Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Question Is gzip facility not available for shared plans

    Hello friends,

    I just want to know is gzip facility not for those using shard hosting plan or some hosts do offer it?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indiana, USA
    Posts
    15,413
    Quote Originally Posted by sash_007 View Post
    Hello friends,

    I just want to know is gzip facility not for those using shard hosting plan or some hosts do offer it?
    You can enable it on a cPanel host under "Website Optimization" or if you're with a LiteSpeed host chances are it's enabled by default.

    If you're in doubt, ask any provider before you sign up.
    Michael Denney - MDDHosting, LLC - Professional Hosting Solutions
    LiteSpeed Powered - Shared, Premium, Reseller, and VPS
    For high-end shared accounts ideal for business, check out our Premium offerings!
    http://www.mddhosting.com/ - Providing Quality Services since 2007

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    483
    Most cpanel hosts should provide the same by default as its very easy to include while apache is compiled using easyapache.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    11,652
    Apache 2 use mod_deflate instead. Some hosts do not offer because there are some issues of mod_gzip with FF ("The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression" error). Still the save of bandwidth is not that much that should make it a must IMHO.
    Shared Web Hosting - Reseller Hosting - Semi-Dedicated Servers - SolusVM/XEN VPS
    LiteSpeed Powered - R1Soft Continuous Data Protection - 24/7 Chat/Email/Helpdesk Support
    Cpanel/WHM - Softaculous - R1soft Backup - Litespeed - Cloudlinux -Site Builder- SSH support - Account Migration
    DowntownHost LLC - In Business since 2001- West/Center/East USA - Netherlands - Singapore

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indiana, USA
    Posts
    15,413
    Quote Originally Posted by Jedito View Post
    Apache 2 use mod_deflate instead. Some hosts do not offer because there are some issues of mod_gzip with FF ("The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression" error). Still the save of bandwidth is not that much that should make it a must IMHO.
    The error with FF you are mentioning is generally when a page is double-compressed which could be due to compressing it via PHP as well as mod_deflate or several other reasons. This will *never* happen simply due to enabling gzip compression / mod_deflate alone and will always be a result of several factors.

    The way mod_deflate works is that the server only sends gzip'd content if the browser requests it so that it doesn't break support for older browsers that do not support gzip compression.

    There are no negative side-effects to enabling mod_deflate beyond maybe a little additional CPU time on the server to compress the page but that's generally minuscule compared to the bandwidth/time savings transferring less data.
    Michael Denney - MDDHosting, LLC - Professional Hosting Solutions
    LiteSpeed Powered - Shared, Premium, Reseller, and VPS
    For high-end shared accounts ideal for business, check out our Premium offerings!
    http://www.mddhosting.com/ - Providing Quality Services since 2007

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    11,652
    The bandwidth/time saving on this time is almost imperceptible, it was useful some years ago when to open a 300 KB page could take 40 seconds, today it doesn't worth it.

    About the FF error, I saw it on simply PHP files, without being compressed through PHP or in any other way.
    Shared Web Hosting - Reseller Hosting - Semi-Dedicated Servers - SolusVM/XEN VPS
    LiteSpeed Powered - R1Soft Continuous Data Protection - 24/7 Chat/Email/Helpdesk Support
    Cpanel/WHM - Softaculous - R1soft Backup - Litespeed - Cloudlinux -Site Builder- SSH support - Account Migration
    DowntownHost LLC - In Business since 2001- West/Center/East USA - Netherlands - Singapore

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indiana, USA
    Posts
    15,413
    Quote Originally Posted by Jedito View Post
    The bandwidth/time saving on this time is almost imperceptible, it was useful some years ago when to open a 300 KB page could take 40 seconds, today it doesn't worth it.

    About the FF error, I saw it on simply PHP files, without being compressed through PHP or in any other way.
    I guarantee you that if you saved the output of that file in some fashion and ran gunzip on it twice that you'd get the actual content of the page. And no, I'm not talking about the "Friendly Error Message" from FireFox but the actual output from the server that is resulting in the error message.

    That message is always the result of double compression due to two different systems or processes compressing the content.

    If you get that error you can simply disable one of the forms of compression and the error will go away - it's not a mod_deflate issue in and of itself.

    As for it being useless - when you have hundreds of thousands of page views per month a 45%+ savings per page view can be a HUGE amount of bandwidth savings. Maybe it doesn't matter to some, but for me it's worth it.

    Just throwing some rough numbers out there - say your page is 250kb including html, css, js, etc... (excluding images and other files gzip won't compress) and you get 45% bandwidth savings from compression:
    Uncompressed for 100,000 Page Views: 25,000,000 KB Used
    Compressed for 100,000 Page Views: 13,750,000 KB Used

    For a real-world example:
    http://www.whatsmyip.org/http_compre...5ndGFsay5jb20v

    Code:
    http://www.webhostingtalk.com/ is gzipped
    Original Size: 111.5 KB
    Gzipped Size: 20.36 KB
    Data Savings: 81.74%
    WHT's front page over 100,000 page views would save a whopping 9,114,000 KB (8900.390625 MB) with GZIP compression on as apposed to it being off. Now this may not be a "lot" to you - for me that's 81.74% bandwidth saved that I can use for other things like images, etc...
    Last edited by MikeDVB; 06-16-2010 at 02:41 PM.
    Michael Denney - MDDHosting, LLC - Professional Hosting Solutions
    LiteSpeed Powered - Shared, Premium, Reseller, and VPS
    For high-end shared accounts ideal for business, check out our Premium offerings!
    http://www.mddhosting.com/ - Providing Quality Services since 2007

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    48
    I believe GZIP improves page loading time even with today's broadband speeds. I am actually going to move away from a shared plan because they do not support GZIP. I suggest you specifically inquire about this.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indiana, USA
    Posts
    15,413
    Quote Originally Posted by vivalasvegas View Post
    I believe GZIP improves page loading time even with today's broadband speeds. I am actually going to move away from a shared plan because they do not support GZIP. I suggest you specifically inquire about this.
    It's not that shared hosting doesn't support gzip, it's that your current provider doesn't support it.
    Michael Denney - MDDHosting, LLC - Professional Hosting Solutions
    LiteSpeed Powered - Shared, Premium, Reseller, and VPS
    For high-end shared accounts ideal for business, check out our Premium offerings!
    http://www.mddhosting.com/ - Providing Quality Services since 2007

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    48
    It's not that shared hosting doesn't support gzip, it's that your current provider doesn't support it
    Mike,
    This is what I said/meant.

    By the way, a suggestion for the OP: Steadfast.net offers quality shared hosting with GZIP enabled.
    Last edited by vivalasvegas; 06-16-2010 at 03:40 PM.

  11. Newsletters

    Subscribe Now & Get The WHT Quick Start Guide!

Similar Threads

  1. How to create hosting plans without email facility
    By officer in forum Web Hosting
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-20-2005, 04:14 PM
  2. Seeking top-notch RAID facility in US, _not itself offering shared hosting_
    By Organon in forum Hosting Security and Technology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-19-2005, 11:10 AM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-28-2003, 04:31 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-20-2003, 05:06 AM
  5. Quality Ensim Reseller Plans @ UUNet/WorldCom Facility
    By OneOfThem in forum Shared Hosting Offers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-08-2002, 05:25 PM

Related Posts from theWHIR.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •