Results 1 to 23 of 23
Thread: Ubiquity and network to Europe
-
03-15-2010, 10:11 AM #1Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 86
Ubiquity and network to Europe
Since 2 weeks of so, we're having horrible connections between Europe and our servers in the United States (Ubiqiuty).
Our monitoring server is located in Chicago and is constantly sending false alerts that servers are offline.
Even connectivity between their own POPs (Chicago to Los Angeles) fails frequently.
Ticket has been open since the 2nd of March, and each time they are putting the blame on one of their carriers.
Is anyone having the same kind of issues with them?
Here some traceroutes:
Code:traceroute to 217.18.70.7 (217.18.70.7), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 64.120.12.17.novanetworks.net (64.120.12.17) 0.330 ms 0.420 ms 0.549 ms 2 g0-6.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.177) 4.099 ms 4.095 ms 4.096 ms 3 te4-5.cr01.lga01.us.mzima.net (69.174.120.73) 21.936 ms 21.988 ms 21.971 ms 4 gi3-0.nyc-002-inter-1.interoute.net (198.32.160.102) 22.179 ms 22.184 ms * 5 * * * 6 * * * 7 * * * 8 * * * 9 * * * 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * * 23 * * * 24 * * * 25 * * * 26 * * * 27 * * * 28 * * * 29 * * * 30 * * *
Code:traceroute to frog.serverffs.com (94.23.26.143), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 64.120.12.17.novanetworks.net (64.120.12.17) 0.315 ms 0.421 ms 0.537 ms 2 te1-4.ar1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.65) 1.264 ms 1.347 ms 1.452 ms 3 ae1-40g.cr2.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.137) 0.975 ms 0.958 ms 0.988 ms 4 te8-3.ar3.CHI2.gblx.net (69.31.110.225) 1.366 ms 1.410 ms te9-3.ar3.CHI2.gblx.net (69.31.110.233) 1.496 ms 5 * * * 6 * * * 7 * * * 8 * * * 9 * * * 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * * 23 * * * 24 * * * 25 * * * 26 * * * 27 * * * 28 * * * 29 * * * 30 * * *
Code:traceroute to cheetah.serverffs.com (174.34.155.106), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 64.120.12.17.novanetworks.net (64.120.12.17) 3.778 ms 3.902 ms 4.041 ms 2 ip65-47-180-113.z180-47-65.customer.algx.net (65.47.180.113) 0.910 ms 0.911 ms 0.908 ms 3 ge11-1-4d0.mcr2.chicago-il.us.xo.net (207.88.172.13) 1.021 ms 1.014 ms 1.017 ms 4 ae1d0.mcr1.chicago-il.us.xo.net (216.156.1.81) 1.291 ms 1.277 ms 1.242 ms 5 216.156.0.161.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.0.161) 62.548 ms 62.530 ms 62.501 ms 6 te-3-2-0.rar3.dallas-tx.us.xo.net (207.88.12.14) 62.415 ms 62.214 ms 62.200 ms 7 vb12.rar3.la-ca.us.xo.net (207.88.12.46) 62.248 ms 62.392 ms 62.368 ms 8 ae0d0.mcr1.la-ca.us.xo.net (216.156.0.114) 62.084 ms 61.834 ms 61.821 ms 9 ae1d0.mcr1.santaana-ca.us.xo.net (216.156.1.58) 61.779 ms 61.762 ms 61.775 ms 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * * 23 * * * 24 * * * 25 * * * 26 * * * 27 * * * 28 * * * 29 * * * 30 * * *
- Dedicated servers with instant setup - http://www.instantdedi.com
- Gameservers, Webhosting, Domains, IRC Bouncers, Dedicated Servers and more with instant setup - https://www.serverffs.com
All covered by our phone support, low pricing and unique custom control panel.
-
03-15-2010, 10:18 AM #2Custom Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 2,602
Are you sure this issue isn't cause by OVH's terrible network?
Code:traceroute to frog.serverffs.com (94.23.26.143), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 [...] 2 te6-8.dsr02.dllstx2.theplanet.com (70.87.254.253) 0.416 ms 0.458 ms 0.269 ms 3 te9-4.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com (70.87.253.125) 1.244 ms 85.fd.5746.static.theplanet.com (70.87.253.133) 1.138 ms te7-4.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com (70.87.253.121) 1.190 ms 4 et3-2.ibr03.dllstx3.theplanet.com (70.87.253.17) 0.601 ms 0.527 ms 0.429 ms 5 xe-2-4.r01.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (157.238.225.5) 11.694 ms 11.624 ms 11.729 ms 6 xe-1-2.r02.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.4.173) 0.737 ms 0.621 ms 0.652 ms 7 po-1.r03.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.94) 0.837 ms 0.754 ms 0.878 ms 8 xe-0.tata-communications.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.9.14) 5.999 ms * * 9 if-6-0-0-1697.core2.DTX-Dallas.as6453.net (66.198.2.1) 0.740 ms 0.726 ms if-5-0-0-31.core2.DTX-Dallas.as6453.net (66.198.2.37) 1.074 ms 10 if-2-0-705.core1.DTX-Dallas.as6453.net (66.198.2.50) 1.485 ms 1.616 ms 1.491 ms 11 if-0-0-0-931.core3.AEQ-Ashburn.as6453.net (216.6.53.78) 36.460 ms 37.040 ms 36.949 ms 12 if-15-0.core1.PYE-Paris.as6453.net (216.6.51.54) 119.851 ms 119.619 ms 119.513 ms 13 if-11-4.har1.PV0-Paris.as6453.net (195.219.224.77) 121.727 ms 121.693 ms 121.460 ms 14 * * * 15 40g.vss-1-6k.routers.chtix.eu (91.121.131.29) 142.122 ms * * 16 frog.serverffs.com (94.23.26.143) 115.028 ms 114.947 ms 115.035 ms traceroute to cheetah.serverffs.com (174.34.155.106), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 [...] 2 te6-8.dsr02.dllstx2.theplanet.com (70.87.254.253) 0.564 ms 0.495 ms 0.406 ms 3 te9-4.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com (70.87.253.125) 0.639 ms te7-4.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com (70.87.253.121) 0.844 ms 85.fd.5746.static.theplanet.com (70.87.253.133) 1.004 ms 4 et3-1.ibr03.dllstx3.theplanet.com (70.87.253.21) 0.923 ms 0.774 ms 0.447 ms 5 209.66.99.89.available.above.net (209.66.99.89) 0.575 ms 0.795 ms 0.722 ms 6 xe-2-1-0.er1.ord2.us.above.net (64.125.30.62) 28.456 ms 28.356 ms 28.496 ms 7 xe-1-1-0.er1.ord7.above.net (64.125.26.250) 28.623 ms 28.535 ms 28.458 ms 8 xe1-1.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (206.223.119.62) 28.552 ms 28.483 ms 28.376 ms 9 te0-0.cr01.dfw01.us.mzima.net (69.174.120.14) 30.917 ms te0-0.cr02.sjc02.us.mzima.net (69.174.120.9) 66.204 ms 66.139 ms 10 te1-1.cr01.phx01.us.mzima.net (69.174.120.37) 59.581 ms te0-1.cr01.lax02.us.mzima.net (69.174.120.85) 62.210 ms te1-1.cr01.phx01.us.mzima.net (69.174.120.37) 59.826 ms 11 te1-1.cr01.lax02.us.mzima.net (69.174.120.33) 60.376 ms 69.342 ms 69.256 ms 12 edge1.lax.ubiquityservers.com (216.193.192.22) 59.924 ms 60.007 ms cheetah.serverffs.com (174.34.155.106) 62.104 ms
-
03-15-2010, 10:19 AM #3Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 86
No, I'm having the problems with 4 separate networks and datacenters (Germany, France, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom).
'cheetah.serverffs.com' is the server in Los Angeles and '217.18.70.7' is a server in The Netherlands, both have no connections with OVH whatsoever.
Further more, it isn't a permanent problem (it indeed works right now). It happens for about 5 to 10 minutes a few times per day.- Dedicated servers with instant setup - http://www.instantdedi.com
- Gameservers, Webhosting, Domains, IRC Bouncers, Dedicated Servers and more with instant setup - https://www.serverffs.com
All covered by our phone support, low pricing and unique custom control panel.
-
03-15-2010, 10:52 AM #4Marketing Maestro
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Isle of Man
- Posts
- 3,068
Funnily enough I was doing some network testing from here in MANCHESTER (UK) to Ubiquity last night. To my server in New York with them I got 101ms average (which is good) and in comparison I got about 100-102ms to InterServer.
I was doing these tests (per Dougy's request ) and I did to his Ubiquity box in Chicago and I got 141ms - which I think it normal.. ish.
No problems from here in Europe to Ubiquity.
-
03-15-2010, 02:27 PM #5Always there
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Europe
- Posts
- 3,822
Same, no problem from our locations to Ubiquity.
█ Swiftway.net Your Business deserves our Quality - Experts on Hand since 2005. Europe & US locations, we operate our own network AS35017 Support response time <15 minutes 24/7
█ Introducing our new Entry level server line ! Support response time <15 minutes 24/7. Technology Fast 50 & Fast 500 award winning for multiple years, Your Business deserves Swiftway Quality.
-
03-16-2010, 12:04 AM #6Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Posts
- 358
Doesn't seem to be any issue for me. Ubiquity Chicago:
Code:traceroute to 217.18.70.7 (217.18.70.7), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 ungracious.info (64.120.13.33) 0.000 ms 0.000 ms 0.000 ms 2 g0-6.cr01.ord01.mzima.net (72.37.148.177) 8.000 ms 8.000 ms 8.000 ms 3 te4-5.cr01.lga01.us.mzima.net (69.174.120.73) 28.000 ms 28.000 ms 28.000 ms 4 gi3-0.nyc-002-inter-1.interoute.net (198.32.160.102) 24.000 ms 24.000 ms * 5 Gi7-0.nyc-002-access-1.interoute.net (212.23.43.137) 100.000 ms * 100.000 ms 6 PO6-0.lon-001-access-1.interoute.net (212.23.43.150) 100.000 ms 100.000 ms 100.000 ms 7 xe-1-3-0-0.lon-004-score-1-re1.interoute.net (84.233.218.182) 100.000 ms 100.000 ms 100.000 ms 8 dc-server-2.adam.psi.com (195.81.245.2) 100.000 ms 96.000 ms 96.000 ms 9 PO9-0.rtm-vla-access-1.interoute.net (212.23.41.201) 96.000 ms 100.000 ms 100.000 ms 10 217.118.121.134 (217.118.121.134) 100.000 ms 100.000 ms 100.000 ms 11 csw-0.cpl-mkb.grafix.nl (217.67.247.27) 104.000 ms csw-1.cpl-mkb.grafix.nl (217.67.247.26) 104.000 ms csw-0.cpl-mkb.grafix.nl (217.67.247.27) 104.000 ms 12 emu.serverffs.com (217.18.70.7) 104.000 ms 104.000 ms 104.000 ms traceroute to frog.serverffs.com (94.23.26.143), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 ungracious.info (64.120.13.33) 12.000 ms 12.000 ms 12.000 ms 2 ip65-47-180-113.z180-47-65.customer.algx.net (65.47.180.113) 4.000 ms 4.000 ms 4.000 ms 3 ge11-1-4d0.mcr2.chicago-il.us.xo.net (207.88.172.13) 4.000 ms 4.000 ms 4.000 ms 4 ae1d0.mcr1.chicago-il.us.xo.net (216.156.1.81) 4.000 ms 0.000 ms 0.000 ms 5 216.156.0.161.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.0.161) 0.000 ms 0.000 ms 0.000 ms 6 207.88.13.5.ptr.us.xo.net (207.88.13.5) 0.000 ms 0.000 ms 0.000 ms 7 206.111.2.138.ptr.us.xo.net (206.111.2.138) 0.000 ms 0.000 ms 0.000 ms 8 30g.ldn-1-6k.routers.ovh.net (94.23.122.125) 96.000 ms * * 9 20g.vss-1-6k.routers.chtix.eu (94.23.122.66) 100.000 ms * * 10 frog.serverffs.com (94.23.26.143) 100.000 ms 100.000 ms 100.000 ms traceroute to cheetah.serverffs.com (174.34.155.106), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 ungracious.info (64.120.13.33) 8.000 ms 8.000 ms 8.000 ms 2 ip65-47-180-113.z180-47-65.customer.algx.net (65.47.180.113) 4.000 ms 4.000 ms 4.000 ms 3 ge11-1-3d0.mcr2.chicago-il.us.xo.net (207.88.172.9) 4.000 ms 4.000 ms 4.000 ms 4 ae1d0.mcr1.chicago-il.us.xo.net (216.156.1.81) 4.000 ms 4.000 ms 4.000 ms 5 216.156.0.161.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.0.161) 60.000 ms 60.000 ms 60.000 ms 6 te-3-2-0.rar3.dallas-tx.us.xo.net (207.88.12.14) 64.000 ms 60.000 ms 60.000 ms 7 vb12.rar3.la-ca.us.xo.net (207.88.12.46) 60.000 ms 60.000 ms 60.000 ms 8 ae0d0.mcr1.la-ca.us.xo.net (216.156.0.114) 60.000 ms 60.000 ms 60.000 ms 9 216.156.11.66.ptr.us.xo.net (216.156.11.66) 60.000 ms 60.000 ms 60.000 ms 10 ip65-46-14-106.z14-46-65.customer.algx.net (65.46.14.106) 68.000 ms 64.000 ms 64.000 ms 11 cheetah.serverffs.com (174.34.155.106) 64.000 ms 64.000 ms 64.000 ms
-
03-16-2010, 07:00 AM #7Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 86
Like I said, it only happens a few times per day for only a few minutes.
It works fine for me as well, you will only notice this problem if you run something constant (such as monitoring).- Dedicated servers with instant setup - http://www.instantdedi.com
- Gameservers, Webhosting, Domains, IRC Bouncers, Dedicated Servers and more with instant setup - https://www.serverffs.com
All covered by our phone support, low pricing and unique custom control panel.
-
03-16-2010, 07:48 AM #8:]
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Pennsylvania, USA
- Posts
- 686
-
03-16-2010, 07:49 AM #9Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 86
This has never been a problem in the months before this, nothing has changed and there is no such firewall running.
Don't the traceroutes clearly show there is something wrong far before it reaches the server?- Dedicated servers with instant setup - http://www.instantdedi.com
- Gameservers, Webhosting, Domains, IRC Bouncers, Dedicated Servers and more with instant setup - https://www.serverffs.com
All covered by our phone support, low pricing and unique custom control panel.
-
03-16-2010, 12:26 PM #10noobie
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Chicago
- Posts
- 1,000
serverFFS, I'd like to help you with this. I have to say that at this point, we probably have hundreds if not thousands of users that monitor their websites and servers from all over the map, including all sorts of monitoring that we do ourselves. We have not been aware of any recent widespread problems. Like you, we also do all of the monitoring for our NOC from Chicago, which has shown no widespread issues.
I can certainly see how seeing such a trace would be frustrating, however, whatever the real problem might lie. If you could provide me with a ticket ID I'd like to personally assist you in private in troubleshooting further.
-
03-16-2010, 01:07 PM #11Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- Vancouver, B.C.
- Posts
- 2,699
ASTUTE INTERNET: Advanced, customized, and scalable solutions with AS54527 Premium Performance and Canadian Optimized Network (Level3, Shaw, CogecoPeer1, GTT/Tinet),
AS63213 Cost Effective High Performance Network (Cogent, HE, GTT/Tinet)
Dedicated Hosting, Colo, Bandwidth, and Fiber out of Vancouver, Seattle, LA, Toronto, NYC, and Miami
-
03-17-2010, 01:09 PM #12Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 86
It seems to be rock solid again right now (as usual), so I can't provide a meaningful traceroute.
As soon as something goes bad again I'll get a new traceroute from both sides to have a look.- Dedicated servers with instant setup - http://www.instantdedi.com
- Gameservers, Webhosting, Domains, IRC Bouncers, Dedicated Servers and more with instant setup - https://www.serverffs.com
All covered by our phone support, low pricing and unique custom control panel.
-
03-17-2010, 01:37 PM #13Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 64
Perhaps you should contact Ubiquity directly next time rather than making a topic on WHT? It seems their staff is more than willing to help with issues such as this.
-
03-17-2010, 02:16 PM #14Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 86
Perhaps you should read the actual topic before replying?
Ticket has been open since the 2nd of March, and each time they are putting the blame on one of their carriers.- Dedicated servers with instant setup - http://www.instantdedi.com
- Gameservers, Webhosting, Domains, IRC Bouncers, Dedicated Servers and more with instant setup - https://www.serverffs.com
All covered by our phone support, low pricing and unique custom control panel.
-
03-17-2010, 02:24 PM #15Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 64
I did read, but I also read:
serverFFS, I'd like to help you with this. I have to say that at this point, we probably have hundreds if not thousands of users that monitor their websites and servers from all over the map, including all sorts of monitoring that we do ourselves. We have not been aware of any recent widespread problems. Like you, we also do all of the monitoring for our NOC from Chicago, which has shown no widespread issues.
I can certainly see how seeing such a trace would be frustrating, however, whatever the real problem might lie. If you could provide me with a ticket ID I'd like to personally assist you in private in troubleshooting further.
-
03-17-2010, 02:26 PM #16Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 86
I'm definitely not trying to scare away people from Ubiquity, that's why I posted this later on:
It seems to be rock solid again right now (as usual)
I just needed a second opinion on this issue.- Dedicated servers with instant setup - http://www.instantdedi.com
- Gameservers, Webhosting, Domains, IRC Bouncers, Dedicated Servers and more with instant setup - https://www.serverffs.com
All covered by our phone support, low pricing and unique custom control panel.
-
03-17-2010, 02:28 PM #17Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 64
-
03-17-2010, 02:30 PM #18Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 86
Glad we reached an agreement, I'll post back here in a few weeks with the resolution of this issue
- Dedicated servers with instant setup - http://www.instantdedi.com
- Gameservers, Webhosting, Domains, IRC Bouncers, Dedicated Servers and more with instant setup - https://www.serverffs.com
All covered by our phone support, low pricing and unique custom control panel.
-
03-20-2010, 04:53 AM #19Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 61
Rock solid network no questions about that. I have the same problem with two servers in the same data center.
traceroute to ubiquityservers.com (69.147.227.178), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 ungracious.info (64.120.13.33) 1.356 ms 1.312 ms 1.292 ms
2 * * *
3 * * *
4 * * *
5 * * *
6 * * *
7 * * *
8 * * *
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
15 * * *
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
22 * * *
23 * * *
24 * * *
25 * * *
26 * * *
27 * * *
28 * * *
29 * * *
30 * * *
[root@server1 ~]#
traceroute -I ubiquityservers.com
traceroute to ubiquityservers.com (69.147.227.178), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 ungracious.info (64.120.13.33) 12.045 ms 12.031 ms 12.029 ms
2 ubiquityservers.com (69.147.227.178) 12.010 ms 12.011 ms 12.009 ms
[root@server1 ~]#
Do you have your firewall on? even with the firewall down i get the same resoults.
-
03-20-2010, 07:58 AM #20Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 64
That's a strange traceroute, but -I uses ICMP pings and it seems it replied just fine. So what's the problem with that?
-
03-20-2010, 08:06 AM #21Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 61
There is no problem with ping, just the "That's a strange traceroute" part.
-
03-20-2010, 08:13 AM #22Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 64
I get strange traceroutes like that sometimes, I'm actually not 100% sure what the default kind of packet traceroute sends out, but I think it's perfectly fine to ignore. It's only one hop away and such and in the end it actually gets there.
Here is an example:
[brandon@v.exhort.ca:~] traceroute amor.exhort.es
traceroute to amor.exhort.es (82.98.148.112), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 67.212.67.221 (67.212.67.221) 0.912 ms 1.078 ms 1.064 ms
2 64.15.64.62 (64.15.64.62) 0.583 ms 0.702 ms 0.699 ms
3 ge-6-13.car2.Montreal2.Level3.net (4.59.178.5) 0.558 ms 0.674 ms 0.782 ms
4 ae-11-11.car1.Montreal2.Level3.net (4.69.141.2) 0.755 ms 0.754 ms 0.763 ms
5 ae-5-5.ebr4.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.141.6) 13.880 ms 13.853 ms 13.847 ms
6 ae-74-74.csw2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.118) 9.909 ms ae-94-94.csw4.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.126) 8.468 ms ae-64-64.csw1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.114) 13.886 ms
7 ae-71-71.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.69) 8.715 ms ae-81-81.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.73) 8.841 ms ae-91-91.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.77) 8.683 ms
8 ae-43-43.ebr2.London1.Level3.net (4.69.137.73) 77.360 ms ae-44-44.ebr2.London1.Level3.net (4.69.137.77) 77.165 ms ae-41-41.ebr2.London1.Level3.net (4.69.137.65) 77.340 ms
9 ae-21-52.car1.London1.Level3.net (4.69.139.98) 78.955 ms 131.651 ms 131.641 ms
10 212.113.16.110 (212.113.16.110) 77.171 ms 77.231 ms 77.360 ms
11 ae0-0.lon-004-score-1-re1.interoute.net (84.233.218.158) 100.098 ms 100.485 ms 100.466 ms
12 ae1-0.par-gar-score-1-re1.interoute.net (212.23.42.21) 83.599 ms 83.844 ms 83.835 ms
13 ae1-0.mad-001-score-1-re0.interoute.net (89.202.161.21) 100.432 ms 100.409 ms 100.208 ms
14 195.81.198.90 (195.81.198.90) 111.559 ms 111.541 ms 111.317 ms
15 * * *
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
22 * * *
23 * * *
24 * * *
25 * * *
26 * * *
27 * * *
28 * * *
29 * * *
30 * * *
[brandon@v.exhort.ca:~] ping amor.exhort.es
PING amor.exhort.es (82.98.148.112) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from amor.exhort.es (82.98.148.112): icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=111 ms
64 bytes from amor.exhort.es (82.98.148.112): icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=110 ms
64 bytes from amor.exhort.es (82.98.148.112): icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=111 ms
64 bytes from amor.exhort.es (82.98.148.112): icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=111 ms
As you can see the traceroute was messed up, but the traffic reaches its destination perfectly fine.
-
03-20-2010, 08:43 AM #23Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 61
Well the network is solid so I'm not worry about the routes, i newer got a clean route from my servers in the last 2-3 weeks, not even from server to server however ping is fine.
traceroute to exhort.es (82.98.145.14), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 ungracious.info (64.120.13.33) 0.695 ms 0.668 ms 1.603 ms
2 ip65-47-180-113.z180-47-65.customer.algx.net (65.47.180.113) 1.598 ms 1.587 ms *
3 * * *
4 * * *
5 * * *
6 * * *
7 gi2-32.mpd01.ord03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.12.229) 1.748 ms 1.936 ms 1.916 ms
8 te3-4.ccr01.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.25.65) 1.897 ms * *
9 * te0-2-0-3.ccr21.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.29.154) 27.731 ms 27.695 ms
10 te3-2.ccr02.par04.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.1.94) 113.965 ms te7-2.ccr01.par01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.30.90) 107.902 ms 107.870 ms
11 * te0-0-0-7.ccr22.par01.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.49.53) 111.790 ms te4-7.mpd03.par01.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.50.149) 114.773 ms
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
15 * dinahosting.demarc.cogentco.com (149.6.150.70) 141.823 ms *
16 vls13.dinaserver.com (82.98.145.14) 135.882 ms 138.617 ms 136.560 ms
[root@server1 ~]#
traceroute to exhort.es (82.98.145.14), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 64.120.12.17.novanetworks.net (64.120.12.17) 0.389 ms 0.466 ms 0.547 ms
2 ip65-47-180-113.z180-47-65.customer.algx.net (65.47.180.113) 1.010 ms 1.000 ms *
3 * * *
4 ae1d0.mcr1.chicago-il.us.xo.net (216.156.1.81) 1.371 ms * *
5 * * *
6 * * *
7 * * *
8 * vl3489.mpd01.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.5.17) 1.659 ms te1-1.mpd01.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.93) 1.554 ms
9 te0-2-0-3.ccr21.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.29.154) 27.206 ms te0-1-0-2.ccr21.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.29.150) 27.030 ms te0-2-0-3.mpd21.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.29.162) 27.066 ms
10 * te3-7.ccr02.lhr01.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.51.158) 105.844 ms 105.822 ms
11 * * te0-0-0-7.ccr22.par01.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.49.53) 110.836 ms
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * dinahosting.demarc.cogentco.com (149.6.150.70) 137.666 ms *
15 vls13.dinaserver.com (82.98.145.14) 137.734 ms 137.647 ms 137.902 ms
[root@server2 ~]#
Similar Threads
-
Ubiquity Servers Review - Excellent Service, Great Network!
By mdfederici in forum Colocation, Data Centers, IP Space and NetworksReplies: 7Last Post: 05-15-2009, 11:00 AM -
Ubiquity Servers •• Rent one server, get one free •• Quality Network
By zomgmike in forum Dedicated Hosting OffersReplies: 0Last Post: 05-05-2009, 06:00 PM -
Ubiquity Servers •• Rent one server, get one free •• Quality Network
By zomgmike in forum Dedicated Hosting OffersReplies: 0Last Post: 04-27-2009, 04:45 PM -
Ubiquity Servers •• Rent one server, get one free •• Quality Network
By zomgmike in forum Dedicated Hosting OffersReplies: 0Last Post: 04-20-2009, 04:33 PM -
Ubiquity Servers •• Rent one server, get one free •• Quality Network
By zomgmike in forum Dedicated Hosting OffersReplies: 2Last Post: 04-14-2009, 02:29 PM