
02-01-2010, 02:18 AM
|
|
Junior Guru Wannabe
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 83
|
|
Windows Server 2003 R2, 2008 or 2008 R2 for my GSP ?
Hello people!
well, im starting a new GSP company and im wondering wich will be the best OS for my servers:
1) Windows server 2003 R2
2) Windows Server 2008
3) Windows Server 2008 R2
The OS MUST be windows because im going to use TCADMIN as the panel.
The Dedicated servers that i bought have this specs:
*Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 (overclocked to 3.2ghz)
*8gb ram
*2x320gb sata2 raid0 128k stripe
*Nvidia 9300 chipset motherboard.
I know that windows server 2003 eats a LOT less RAM that 2008, but i heard that it has a bad memory management so its necesary to restart the server very frequently to unload the RAM, and that 2008 doesnt has that problem.
So, what do you think? 2003 R2, 2008 or 2008 R2 ?????
Thankyou very much in advance    
|

02-01-2010, 02:44 AM
|
|
Temporarily Suspended
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 8
|
|
Win 2008 R2 can use max to 256 CPU (~64 Physical CPU)
With your server, I think you can use Win2008
|

02-01-2010, 04:42 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 682
|
|
__________________
Helm 3 - 4 Control Panel Setup / WebSitePanel / Hosting Controller / Installation / Configuration / Troubleshooting / Migrations
Windows Server Management / Security / Hardening
I speak English and Spanish
|

02-01-2010, 04:43 AM
|
|
MMO Infrastructure Guru
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 940
|
|
__________________
█ Charles W. @ Nexeon Technologies, Inc. - www.nexeontech.com - USA, Europe
█ Global provider of web solutions, dedicated servers, cloud hosting, billing systems, and more.
█ ServerDEALS.org - Affordable VPS and Dedicated Server Solutions with Quality Support
█ StratusVPS.com - Journey to the cloud - Pre-register for the private beta today! Code: wht2010
|

02-01-2010, 09:12 AM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,333
|
|
Windows 2008 & R2 is not fully supported by TCAdmin and has a few issues. I suggest going with Windows 2003 until it's fully supported.
|

02-01-2010, 09:14 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Evangelist
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Riverview/Tampa, FL, US
Posts: 533
|
|
2003 R2 Enterprise x64 for the game server
|

02-01-2010, 09:18 AM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,333
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by [Enotch] Mike
2003 R2 Enterprise x64 for the game server
|
No need for enterprise it's a waste of money. Standard is just fine.
|

02-01-2010, 09:24 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Evangelist
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Riverview/Tampa, FL, US
Posts: 533
|
|
But Enterprise is cooler! lol, but seriously, Standard is fine, Just get 64 bit.
|

02-01-2010, 10:14 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States, MI
Posts: 561
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by XFactorServers
Windows 2008 & R2 is not fully supported by TCAdmin and has a few issues. I suggest going with Windows 2003 until it's fully supported.
|
You make it sound like TCAdmin is actually doing something behind the scenes. That software is stalled, theres been nothing new and exciting from them since they launched.
However I agree, 2003 if you with TCAdmin, less bugs like that notorious resource graph bug *cough* lol.
__________________
Steven Crothers
No BS cloud engineer and Red Hat architect.
|

02-01-2010, 10:21 AM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,333
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crothers
You make it sound like TCAdmin is actually doing something behind the scenes. That software is stalled, theres been nothing new and exciting from them since they launched.
However I agree, 2003 if you with TCAdmin, less bugs like that notorious resource graph bug *cough* lol.
|
lol, Crothers. I will not deny your first or second sentence. 
|

02-01-2010, 11:44 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States, MI
Posts: 561
|
|
Except my last sentence was poorly formed  ha
__________________
Steven Crothers
No BS cloud engineer and Red Hat architect.
|

02-01-2010, 12:25 PM
|
|
Junior Guru Wannabe
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 83
|
|
hi again!!!
thanks everybody for your answers, i really appreciate it.
now, suppose that im NOT going to use TCadmin, the difference between Windows server 2003r2 and windows server 2008/r2 is really notorious?
because if it is, i can change the panel for other, i prefer better performance and more game servers in my dedicateds than a panel.
And another question... is there any panel that fully supports ws2008 ?
thankyou very much again!
|

02-01-2010, 02:06 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States, MI
Posts: 561
|
|
Rams cheap, go 2008 x64. Some people like R2, some don't. Its up to you from there.
__________________
Steven Crothers
No BS cloud engineer and Red Hat architect.
|

02-01-2010, 03:56 PM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: USA, EU, UK, CA, AUS
Posts: 1,798
|
|
Windows 2008 R2 is 64 bit so it will take 1 GB from your system. Still the best option. Just make sure you buy 4 GB RAM sticks.
|

02-01-2010, 04:39 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: United States, MI
Posts: 561
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultima VPS
Windows 2008 R2 is 64 bit so it will take 1 GB from your system. Still the best option. Just make sure you buy 4 GB RAM sticks.
|
Out of curiosity, why do you recommend 4gig sticks? I've heard that from a few people now, something about the density provides higher utilization of the ram speed or something, though I've ever seen any proof or papers on that.
__________________
Steven Crothers
No BS cloud engineer and Red Hat architect.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
| Postbit Selector |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Login: |
|
|
| Advertisement: |
|
|
| Web Hosting News: |
|
|
|