hosted by liquidweb


Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : VPS Hosting : Does Your VPS Need A Dedicated IP Address? No!
Reply

Forum Jump

Does Your VPS Need A Dedicated IP Address? No!

Reply Post New Thread In VPS Hosting Subscription
 
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old
WHT Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 106

Does Your VPS Need A Dedicated IP Address? No!


I believed dedicated server / VPS (Virtual Private Server) always requires dedicated IP adress. Until today.

I found (thanks, LowEndBox) interesting option where you can build your VPS totally custom parameters including shared IP address.How can it work? With shared IP? Youre joking! – you may ask. It works.

TOCICI offers “Nginx Accelerated Shared IP” wchich mean:
  • Your VPS will be hidden behind NAT like typical workstation
  • External Ngnix HTTP server will redirect HTTP traffic to your box based on URL domain
  • You can define custom ports to be forwarded to your box (SSH incoming traffic)
Pros:
  • Very cheap option (no cost of dedicated IP required, you can start VPS below 1 USD!
  • Security (by default no ports visible to external world)
Cons:
  • Standard ports except 80 (HTTP) unavailable: no DNS services
  • No HTTPS available (requires separate IP)
  • SSH login requires custom port (your local network may block high ports to prevent P2P)
  • Sending e-mails may require "smarthost" with public IP
The service fills gap between shared hosting and classic VPS. I hope to prepare a review soon.

The only problem from my point of view is the distance between Europe and Portland, Oregon in the USA. 220 ms from Warsaw. Are there any similar (highly customisable) services in Europe?

__________________
Homer knows about his website downtime, what about you?
site-uptime.net site uptime monitor



Last edited by cieslakd; 01-31-2010 at 08:53 AM.


Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Manila
Posts: 958
so if you use that option above. It's like shared hosting.
What's the point of having a vps with that kind of setup?

  #3  
Old
Quant Trader
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: HK
Posts: 3,027
*

Not suprising or interesting.

Even though not everyone would requires a public IP address, having 1 IP shared among with a few people would not be a good idea. One guy spams can get the IP blacklisted. Having services running on a non-standard ports sounds strange in a production environment. You also might have to do/fix something to have your app running behind NAT.

If you use their web to build yourself a VPS with their "shared IP", example, 10G drive, 10G bandwidth, 128MB RAM, the cost come down to about $6 USD. You probably can find a VPS with a static IP at that price in the offers forum (no idea how the services is though).


Last edited by YUPAPA; 01-31-2010 at 10:03 AM.
Sponsored Links
  #4  
Old
WHT Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyah View Post
so if you use that option above. It's like shared hosting.
What's the point of having a vps with that kind of setup?
Data separation. Customisation of any part of the system (excluding kernel that is shared in OpenVZ). This cannot be achieved on shared hosting.

__________________
Homer knows about his website downtime, what about you?
site-uptime.net site uptime monitor


  #5  
Old
WHT Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by YUPAPA View Post
Even though not everyone would requires a public IP address, having 1 IP shared among with a few people would not be a good idea. One guy spams can get the IP blacklisted.
Indeed. It's a shared IP risk.

Quote:
Having services running on a non-standard ports sounds strange in a production environment. You also might have to do/fix something to have your app running behind NAT.
Most software will work as usual (maybe except REMOTE_HOST variable that may be "unusual").

__________________
Homer knows about his website downtime, what about you?
site-uptime.net site uptime monitor


  #6  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Manila
Posts: 958
Quote:
Originally Posted by cieslakd View Post
Data separation. Customisation of any part of the system (excluding kernel that is shared in OpenVZ). This cannot be achieved on shared hosting.
Okay. still, you get a "shared" IP. so what's the point of having such vps? you cant even set ports on it ryt?

  #7  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 846
Maybe my VPS does not need a dedicated IP, but I prefer to have a dedicated IP for my VPS.

I am no security expert, but I think VPS with dedicated IP should be more secure.

  #8  
Old
Junior Guru Wannabe
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 87
I built this...

500GByte/month 512MB Burst RAM 40GB disk space CentOS 5 64bit Shared IP No monitoring/management no server redundancy

And it gave me a price of $55. I get the same thing with a dedicated IP through Ramhost for $12.

Pass.

  #9  
Old
WebHosting Master
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,149
Nothing new, has been around for a long time and used to be pulled off by budget windows VPS providers whose users only need RDP.

As already mentioned above, blacklisted, lack of a HTTP/DNS port, unable to offer services on standard ports, etc. are all major setbacks that makes it not very attractive except to a very niche audience.

The rest of us will be willing to pay that extra buck for that IP for much less trouble.

  #10  
Old
Virtually Flawless ;)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA / UK
Posts: 4,539
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesGT View Post
I built this...

500GByte/month 512MB Burst RAM 40GB disk space CentOS 5 64bit Shared IP No monitoring/management no server redundancy

And it gave me a price of $55.
Wow that is high - that price is in fully managed vps territory - for non-managed on a shared IP it's insane IMO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesGT View Post
I get the same thing with a dedicated IP through Ramhost for $12.


=====

It is an interesting idea - might be a good way to offer shell accounts with root access

With IPv4 addresses due to run out in a couple years I suspect we'll be seeing more providers offering shared IP services like that.

__________________
RAM Host -- Premium & Budget Linux Hosting From The USA & EU
█ Featuring Powerful cPanel CloudLinux Shared Hosting
█ & Cheap Premium Virtual Dedicated Servers
Follow us on Twitter

  #11  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 632
well, this is nothing new, typical NAT setup which existed for years.
whether its viable solution for servers, purely depends on what you are trying to accomplish.

  #12  
Old
WHT Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 136
This isn't a new concept, I believe Virtuozzo has supported Name Based Hosting for a very long time now.

  #13  
Old
[ VPS Enthusiast ]
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cheltenham, UK
Posts: 1,323
While yes, you could class this as interesting... I would rather pay the extra $1 for a private IP and be able to use the VPS normally
A shared IP would be a quick way to get yourself into all kinds of problems - though if you were trying to run a cheap personal website, then it would likely work for that.

__________________
Ben Thomas, Director - BTCentral Web Development Services
http://www.btcentral.org.uk - Need a custom Web App? Visit us online.

  #14  
Old
WHT Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyah View Post
Okay. still, you get a "shared" IP. so what's the point of having such vps? you cant even set ports on it ryt?
You can only set high (>1024) ports (they will be redirected to your box). No well known services on low ports (22, 25 etc.) of course.

__________________
Homer knows about his website downtime, what about you?
site-uptime.net site uptime monitor


  #15  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 3,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by cieslakd View Post
The service fills gap between shared hosting and classic VPS. I hope to prepare a review soon
Even if you ignore all the limitations and issues with doing this how exactly does this bridge the gap between shared and a VPS (classic or not)? There already are products out there that are heavy duty shared accounts (fewer accounts per server more resources then your typical shared) that bridge that gap very nicely at much much better prices.

I don't see the use for this product if it was cheap and at those prices forget about it. Right I can see the selling point:

Do less and Pay More.

Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VPS - problem with ip address SomeOne666 VPS Hosting 6 08-02-2008 09:49 AM
Need many ip address VPS silybh VPS Hosting 6 01-03-2008 03:15 PM
What's the difference between name based address and a dedicated IP address? HostQuest Web Hosting 10 02-13-2004 10:07 PM

Related posts from TheWhir.com
Title Type Date Posted
HostXNow Listing 2014-10-20 03:44:35
Codero Hosting Listing 2014-10-20 03:42:37
Astutium Ltd Listing 2014-01-07 02:25:41
Astutium Ltd Listing 2014-01-07 02:25:41
Dedicated Gaming Listing 2014-10-20 03:44:16


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Login:
Log in with your username and password
Username:
Password:



Forgot Password?
WHT Host Brief Email:

We respect your privacy. We will never sell, rent, or give away your address to any outside party, ever.

Advertisement:
Web Hosting News:
WHT Membership
WHT Membership



 

X

Welcome to WebHostingTalk.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

WebHostingTalk.com is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?