Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Here @ WHT
    Posts
    1,354

    Which is Better? - Lower Pings or Less No. of Traceroute Hops?

    Hello Guys!

    I'm currently in the process of ordering another VPS. I tested to two IPs of different DCs of a Provider.

    IP #1 - The ping times are lower by 20 ms than IP # 2 however, the Traceroute Hops are 19

    IP #2 - Ping times are higher by 20 ms than IP # 1 but, no. of traceroute hops are 14 as compared to IP #1

    So, which is better for me? I will be running a Joomla+vBulletin Forum on the VPS.

    Thanks in Advance and Happy Holidays!
    One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them

  2. #2
    I would say #1, you should consider the ping response. You can also try something like just-ping.com to see response from other geographic locations too, which may be helpful.

    Good luck!
    Exceptional VPS Hosting. With love, 6sync.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    1,895
    Well considering what you are running, either one would probably suffice. That being said I'd go for the lower latency (as such would potentially implicate that the network transit being used is a bit better).

    Amount of Hops/routers you run across isn't really a big deal either way unless it is a substantial amount - to where the latency would possibly spike more often. The issue is certain applications are more latency aware/affected. Being that you're running a forum application latency of only 20ms difference shouldn't cause much of a problem.
    Justin Schurawlow :: Technology Enthusiast
    Schurawlow PC Repair
    Computer Services for the Lehigh Valley area
    Blog :: The Justin Schurawlow Blog

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Here @ WHT
    Posts
    1,354
    Thank you RavC and Justin for your quick responses. Your inputs are highly appreciated.

    OK - I'll go for IP #1.

    Thanks and Happy Holidays!
    One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them

  5. #5
    The number of hops shown in a tracert can be very misleading, because most NSPs hide large chunks of their network through MPLS. You should always look at these three metrics in preference to the number of hops:

    - RTT time ("ping time" or "latency" to the endpoint)
    - Jitter (fluctuations in RTT across multiple test runs)
    - Packet loss (as seen across multiple test runs)

    Traceroutes can also be misleading because oftentimes a hop in the middle will show a high latency that does not affect later hops, simply because the corresponding router was performing a BGP update or other activity that required core CPU and caused it to delay its ICMP TTL-expired replies -- which would not affect traffic flowing through the router.
    John
    President, NFOservers (Nuclearfallout Enterprises, Inc.)
    High-performance (Xen) VPS hosting, game servers, Ventrilo/Murmur/Mumble/TS3 servers, and dedicated servers

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Here @ WHT
    Posts
    1,354
    Quote Originally Posted by edge100x View Post
    The number of hops shown in a tracert can be very misleading, because most NSPs hide large chunks of their network through MPLS. You should always look at these three metrics in preference to the number of hops:

    - RTT time ("ping time" or "latency" to the endpoint)
    - Jitter (fluctuations in RTT across multiple test runs)
    - Packet loss (as seen across multiple test runs)

    Traceroutes can also be misleading because oftentimes a hop in the middle will show a high latency that does not affect later hops, simply because the corresponding router was performing a BGP update or other activity that required core CPU and caused it to delay its ICMP TTL-expired replies -- which would not affect traffic flowing through the router.
    Thanks for the detailed explanation. Much appreciated.
    One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them

  7. #7
    Also, please note that routers on the way seem to lose packets at traceroutes, because most providers have CoPP (control plane policy) set up. Basically you should care only about what edge100x said, and not care at all about what's on the way there.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    London
    Posts
    227
    The number of hops in a traceroute is largely irrelevant, in fact sometimes multiple hops within a hosters own network is a good thing because equipment has been arranged in a redundant manner.
    Andrew Ogilvie | Xtraordinary Hosting | AS30827 | Member of LINX
    Dedicated Servers in Central London | Xen VPS Linux & Windows | Complex Hosting | London BGP4 Bandwidth

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Here @ WHT
    Posts
    1,354
    Thanks. I've ordered my VPS which has lower ping timings.
    One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    9
    Ping lower is better for you.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Here @ WHT
    Posts
    1,354
    MOD please close this thread. My Query has been resolved. Thanks. Happy Holidays.
    One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them

  12. Newsletters

    Subscribe Now & Get The WHT Quick Start Guide!

Similar Threads

  1. Number of hops in traceroute
    By kafloofen in forum Dedicated Server
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-04-2008, 11:50 PM
  2. less hops or less ms?
    By surfmanjoe in forum Dedicated Server
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-18-2005, 01:06 PM
  3. Less hops, better performance?
    By muggle75 in forum Web Hosting
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-24-2003, 04:56 PM
  4. pings and hops
    By cornnuts in forum Web Hosting
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-05-2002, 01:15 PM
  5. Tracert (hops)
    By greatgraddage in forum Web Hosting
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-25-2001, 08:18 AM

Related Posts from theWHIR.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •