Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 33
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Toronto Canada
    Posts
    347

    Thumbs up This is good turn your sound up lol

    For a great new forum please click on my weblink.
    ALLWAYS LOOKING FOR MEMBERS
    VISIT ME AT
    http://www.jmdsforum.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,598
    That's .... disturbing.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Chandler, Arizona
    Posts
    2,564
    lamo funny very funny
    -Robert Norton
    www.SophMedia.com

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Downunder..
    Posts
    2,612
    Right very funny..

    I don't see how you can see this as very funny, bombing another country killing innocent people..




    Two words..


    "Typical Americans".

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Chandler, Arizona
    Posts
    2,564
    killing inocent people? haha your funny..
    -Robert Norton
    www.SophMedia.com

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Downunder..
    Posts
    2,612
    Oh, so they are not innocent? is that what your saying?

    How would you like it if i posted some flash with bin laden, "lets bomb bush & the U.S"?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Chandler, Arizona
    Posts
    2,564
    I'd say "your an idiot" plain and simple...btw i don't know if you noticed this or maybe I wasn't the only one? but it said "its time to bomb saddam" last time i checked saddam is only one person, and we by now should know he's not innocent...
    -Robert Norton
    www.SophMedia.com

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Downunder..
    Posts
    2,612
    Hmm, bombing saddam would mean bombing the country hes based in, wouldnt it? You can't exactly bomb one person, now can you?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Chandler, Arizona
    Posts
    2,564
    sure you can...its called strategic bombing..
    -Robert Norton
    www.SophMedia.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Downunder..
    Posts
    2,612
    Right..

    Like the bombing in afghanistan? Blew a wedding apart, killed a few hundred.. right strategic bombing..

    want me to go on?

    Blah, bunch of war mongers.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,026

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Downunder..
    Posts
    2,612
    Hahaha, i wouldnt be surprised at saddam laughing at these, he wants attention and you sure are giving it to him..

    and what makes it more funny, is your so desperate to get back at him you need these "flash" movies, oh please.. how sad

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Downunder..
    Posts
    2,612
    Since everyone is sharing images, flash ect, i might aswell
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails iraqinvasionchecklist.jpg  

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Chandler, Arizona
    Posts
    2,564
    we have a reason...
    -Robert Norton
    www.SophMedia.com

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Downunder..
    Posts
    2,612
    And enlighten me what that may be?

  16. #16
    Originally posted by edude
    And enlighten me what that may be?
    To ensure that Iraq is not violating the 1991 cease treaty in which they agreed to disarm. Since they kicked out UN inspectors, the United States had to get on their case because of the possibility that they are harboring chemical, biological and/or nuclear weapons/materials.

    The point of war would be to secure any weapons they have. Since they have agreed to let UN inspectors back in, we do not have to go to war. If we did nothing about it and they launched attacks on other nations (with the small possibility of the United States as a target) the results would be many more casualties than would be if we fought them and took the weapons ourselves. The United States does not go in and completely blow up Iraq or even bomb civilian structures, bombs would only be directed at military installations.
    Last edited by mindboggle; 11-19-2002 at 04:05 PM.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Westbury, LI NY
    Posts
    1,705
    Originally posted by edude
    And enlighten me what that may be?
    If you don't think the US has a reason, why don't you ask the UN:

    http://www.daily-journal.com/content/?id=16332

    which intrestingly enough says:

    The administration gamely answers that the United States always reserves the right to make its own judgment and act in its own defense.
    http://www.nypost.com/news/worldnews/62492.htm

    as Iraq upped the ante by firing once again on U.S. and British warplanes over a "no-fly" zone.

    The White House says the Iraqis are in "material breach" of U.N. resolutions simply by firing on the planes - in other words, that Iraq is already asking for war.
    Lets see, they wiolate the rules and provsions of the UN, is that reason enough for you?

    Europeans are tons of fun. Lets take a look at your history for a minute.

    First there is the fact that at a conference in Munich in 1938 the leaders of Italy, France, and England agreed to give land to Hitler as long as he promises not to attack other areas. That was a real smart move. What did Hitler do shortly there after? He attacked other areas.

    Proof that Europe has been slow to act in the face of a clear and repesent danger to the world and would rather just sign treaties saying please don't hurt us, just go bother anyone else, we won't defend them. Way to go Europe!

    What happpens a year later? Britain and France declare war as Hitler walks into Paris. Some good that little treaty did.

    Europe has always been slow to act on such things like this. They were with Hitler they are with Saddam.

    US: This guy has nukes and is trying to use them on us, we decalre war!

    EU: No you don't, not so fast, lets sit and argue about it for a few years, draw up resoltuions, and complain how you are barbarians.

    US: But he forgot to fill out the UN approval form for nukes.

    EU: Where's our army?!? Their all dead men!


    When will Europe learn, after Hitler Jr has taken half the continent and is bombing England? Than the barbarian Americans and their uncivilized manners will be put up with, right?

    please

    Way to take two jokes of political staire and turn it into a political debate, but now you got it.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Alabama of course
    Posts
    1,537
    Edude is it just me or do you just stick your foot in the door everywhere you can to stirr up things?
    KnownHost Managed VPS Specialists
    Fully Managed VPS, Hybrid,and Dedicated Servers
    RocketVPS.com - Premium Unmanaged VPS Hosting
    KnownHost is hiring! Click here for more information!

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Westbury, LI NY
    Posts
    1,705
    Originally posted by DanielP
    Edude is it just me or do you just stick your foot in the door everywhere you can to stirr up things?
    No, some people just don't know what is going on outside their little bubble and that there is a world out there.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Chandler, Arizona
    Posts
    2,564
    Originally posted by DanielP
    Edude is it just me or do you just stick your foot in the door everywhere you can to stirr up things?
    I agree one one thread he said he was from iraq then today from australia..he must move alot
    -Robert Norton
    www.SophMedia.com

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,991
    Originally posted by mindboggle

    To ensure that Iraq is not violating the 1991 cease treaty in which they agreed to disarm. Since they kicked out UN inspectors, the United States had to get on their case because of the possibility that they are harboring chemical, biological and/or nuclear weapons/materials.

    The point of war would be to secure any weapons they have. Since they have agreed to let UN inspectors back in, we do not have to go to war. If we did nothing about it and they launched attacks on other nations (with the small possibility of the United States as a target) the results would be many more casualties than would be if we fought them and took the weapons ourselves. The United States does not go in and completely blow up Iraq or even bomb civilian structures, bombs would only be directed at military installations.
    I agree with edude. How can you bomb Sadaam without injuring innocent people. Even with "strategic bombing" is it possible to just kill one person?

    Hmmh, I guess only Iraq has these weapons? If the US has the right, and other US allies have the right to house weapons of mass destruction, why shouldn't Iraq have this same right?

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    12,185
    Here's what the president has to say about this thread....
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails gwbush.jpg  

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Chandler, Arizona
    Posts
    2,564
    Originally posted by iamdave
    I agree with edude. How can you bomb Sadaam without injuring innocent people. Even with "strategic bombing" is it possible to just kill one person?

    Hmmh, I guess only Iraq has these weapons? If the US has the right, and other US allies have the right to house weapons of mass destruction, why shouldn't Iraq have this same right?

    Our good friend Clinton did us a favor back in 92, hah right. The CIA had a operative in Iraq, how was about to assignate Saddam. Well our good o' boy, decided that he thought this wasn't right. He canceled the operation, and then nailed him for "murder for hire". Saddam would be six feet under if it wasn't for Clinton. Now the reason the USA doesn't want the Iraqi's (Specifically Saddam) to have biological/chemical/nuclear warfare is because of the fact that he has threatined his neighboring countries, he's made threats against the USA. I'm assuming that EDude and IAmDave believe that we're not aloud to protect ourselves. I don't want to get into an argument about the whole 9/11 thing and the FBI/CIA knowing about WTC. But by now don't you think we've learned to be prepared?
    -Robert Norton
    www.SophMedia.com

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    363


    oh dear god...this is just too much


  25. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,991
    Originally posted by interactive



    Our good friend Clinton did us a favor back in 92, hah right. The CIA had a operative in Iraq, how was about to assignate Saddam. Well our good o' boy, decided that he thought this wasn't right. He canceled the operation, and then nailed him for "murder for hire". Saddam would be six feet under if it wasn't for Clinton. Now the reason the USA doesn't want the Iraqi's (Specifically Saddam) to have biological/chemical/nuclear warfare is because of the fact that he has threatined his neighboring countries, he's made threats against the USA. I'm assuming that EDude and IAmDave believe that we're not aloud to protect ourselves. I don't want to get into an argument about the whole 9/11 thing and the FBI/CIA knowing about WTC. But by now don't you think we've learned to be prepared?
    It's on the thing do be prepared, and to protect yourself, but why bomb a country, when you are going to kill innocent people?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Related Posts from theWHIR.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •