Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
10-15-2009, 08:43 PM #1WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 106
SQL Server 2008 Web vs Standard performance-wise
Hello, I recently got a Windows VPS 2008 server running on Hyper-V. We need to set up SQL Server 2008 on this machine and we have two options to choose from: Web or Standard Edition. Feature-wise I know Standard has its advantages over Web but we are concerned about performance impact on our server since we don't have that much spare RAM to use.
I am wondering if these two SQL Editions will consume more or less resources than the other (especially RAM) or will they require the same amount?
We are also considering SQL Express but we wanna offer hosting services and someone might require features found in these other two editions.
We currently host 2 small websites with very low database usage.
Please clarify thanks.Last edited by earthdance; 10-15-2009 at 08:47 PM. Reason: typo
-
10-15-2009, 09:13 PM #2Disabled
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Cochin
- Posts
- 2,452
performance wise they are more or less the same. Its the features that differs. Obviously when there are lesser features, the sql ought to run faster ;, but the data access and stuff like that will be the same across the versions.
Similar Threads
-
What Do I Need Server Wise?
By TheDrunkenGamer in forum Dedicated ServerReplies: 8Last Post: 03-28-2009, 06:20 PM -
new server management from Wise
By wise in forum Systems Management OffersReplies: 0Last Post: 01-09-2009, 07:54 PM -
Wise to run Apache and Lighttpd on the same server?
By rob5 in forum Dedicated ServerReplies: 6Last Post: 02-25-2007, 05:07 PM -
performance wise: php or ruby on rails faster?
By grabmail in forum Programming DiscussionReplies: 28Last Post: 05-29-2006, 08:36 PM -
2x P4 2.4GHz 1GB vs. 1x DualXeon 2.8GHz 2GB, performance wise?
By FrzzMan in forum Dedicated ServerReplies: 9Last Post: 10-14-2004, 06:19 PM