Results 26 to 50 of 96
-
10-06-2009, 03:24 PM #26Disabled
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 443
Whether automatic bandwidth-related emails were sent to the unmanaged customer or not is completely irrelevant. The issue is also not about keeping scripts updated, or who's responsibility that is. Managing a server means handling and dealing with issues, and $1,600 of wasted bandwidth is an indication that an issue was not dealt with in a timely manner. That doesn't even remotely qualify as "managed", in my opinion.
0
-
10-06-2009, 03:41 PM #27Disabled
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 443
er, "whose responsibility"
0
-
10-06-2009, 07:09 PM #28Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- Sacramento CA
- Posts
- 3,513
I'm sorry Daku but while I do see where you are coming from most of your arguments just don't add up (especially the one about "simple users"). As an adult you have to do your own research and decisions. Just b/c your a simple person doesn't mean that somebody is going to stop you from buying that motorcycle and creaming yourself all over the street.
It is your responsibility to to understand the expectations for yourself and your host. FH is offering a service and you need to educate yourself about what they (or any other host offers) and understand your liabilities.
Your one solid point is about the bandwidth monitoring. It does make sense to have a hard cap which would stop your bandwidth abuse (or any other resource really). I've always found it to be very funny how SOME hosts will monitor the heck out of your CPU and RAM. They have clear rules about when they will shut you down if you are abusing the nodes CPU/RAM. Bandwidth....errr... not so much and of course that's the one that you can get get charged with.
Use this as a learning opportunity, make sure you know what your hosts policy are for overages (and of course keep your scripts updated). I wish more people would take this type of policy into their decision making process. Unfortunately most people just look for the cheapest price (and I'm not saying you did, just in general). Anyway /rant off.0
-
10-06-2009, 08:18 PM #29Temporarily Suspended
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- NL
- Posts
- 35
I agree with Daku, i would not pay for the bill. I think that if you used the bandwidth then sure pay it, but i do not think it is your fault. If someone uses your credit card without your permission, your credit card company protects you. I think this is the same thing. If someone abused his bandwidth (or credit card) then he should be exempt of all costs associated with it.
0
-
10-06-2009, 08:36 PM #30Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 282
I was charged once by theplanet, overused 1700 gigs, and paid $425.
0
-
10-06-2009, 11:10 PM #31Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Posts
- 42
Just what I was thinking. Sure they don't manage the scripts that he has on the server, but on the other hand, if you see that this server is pushing 10+ mbits of data (outbound, not in!) I would expect a managed provider to at least run a netstat and find out if the traffic coming out of the VPS is legit. A simple command such as "netstat | grep :" would have shown what I'm sure would be more than 150+ connections to a server on port 80, which is DEFINITELY not right.
Now I'm not saying they should have fixed the issue (hacked script) for him, but as a managed provider you're expected to be proactive, especially since your customers may not be that good with Linux / VPS in general. Part of me thinks that Daku shouldn't pay the bill because they should have caught something like this if they actually had admins watching their servers, but on the other hand, if you had used up to date scripts, this wouldn't have been an issue in the first place. I would say you go ahead and pay the invoice since they have given a discount, and just let this be a lesson learned.0
-
10-07-2009, 05:57 AM #32WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 131
Future hosting are telling me that there was an account using outdated script. I dont even know if there was a script running on that site or how true is that?
Not even a single time have I said that if there was an outdated script, they should have updated it. My point is that if they noticed something so unusual, why didnt they just shut it down and let me investigate? Letting it go and then trying to charge me, this just sounds con to me or money making scheme!
They stop the VPS immediately where is a slight increase in CPU or ram then why not on bandwidth? I am sure that the bandwidth wasn't used in just one single day, so what sort of monitoring are they doing to their servers?
Lesson learnt for me surely but it should be a lesson for them as well. I've offered them to pay something but it appears they have made up their mind!0
-
10-07-2009, 07:23 AM #33Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 201
This is not how managed services work. If *you* install software that gets compromised, it is *your* responsibility. You can't do whatever you want on a system and then expect someone else to clean up the mess. I think the post above was clear, they manage what was installed on the system when it was delivered, and then any changes you make are your responsibility.
If you're looking for them to be responsible for everything, then you're also looking for a system where you have zero access (so you can't screw it up). These exist, I have a couple clients on them. The client has no access to anything, I manage everything for them. In this case, I can understand if something goes wrong, it is *my* responsibility alone.
Does not sound like your system was set up this way.██ Garry Dolley @ ARP Networks | gdolley _at_ arpnetworks . com | #arpnetworks on Freenode | @arpnetworks, @bsdvps
██ State of the art services, strong community and friendly support
██ FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Linux VPS • ARP Metal™ Dedicated Servers • Colocation • IP Transit
██ Native IPv6 • VNC Console • Tunnel VNC over SSH • Serial Console over SSH • DNS Manager0
-
10-07-2009, 07:44 AM #34Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 201
Are you serious? Most hosts are not huge companies like banks and can't afford to just "eat the bandwidth" cost of an irresponsible customer / script / whatever. If Daku had not been a customer, his script(s) would not have been compromised, and the bandwidth would not have been used. It's his responsibility to pay for the bandwidth used by his scripts, not the host just to eat it.
██ Garry Dolley @ ARP Networks | gdolley _at_ arpnetworks . com | #arpnetworks on Freenode | @arpnetworks, @bsdvps
██ State of the art services, strong community and friendly support
██ FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Linux VPS • ARP Metal™ Dedicated Servers • Colocation • IP Transit
██ Native IPv6 • VNC Console • Tunnel VNC over SSH • Serial Console over SSH • DNS Manager0
-
10-07-2009, 09:25 AM #35Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Posts
- 665
1. We did notify the customer there was outbound traffic via a ticket when he was pushing 80mbps outbound - we DO monitor traffic spikes and we do notify customers. There are times we have customers who legitimately are using a large amount of bandwidth. It is particularly common for our customers running services like shoutcast.
2. Our systems send automated e-mails notifying customers they are approaching their bandwidth limit (at 80%) and when they have reached their limit (100%). We verified these messages were sent to the customer.
3. Upon him telling us the traffic was not legitimate, we began assisting him with the problem. We found the issue and notified him of what it was and what needed to be done to correct it.
4. As far as fraudulent charges on a credit card vs. bandwidth usage. There is a fundamental difference. With a credit card, your card holder agreement (contract) affords you the protection of not being held liable for the bandwidth fees. With virtually all hosting provider terms of service, you are liable for your bandwidth usage.
4. We have several customers who use their allocated bandwidth every month and they turn off their VPS upon reaching that limit so they aren't billed overage. Some buy more bandwidth and some simply upgrade their package.
Let's keep in mind, we offered the client a heavily discounted rate for the bandwidth overage as a goodwill gesture. Our cost for the bandwidth overage is significantly higher than the discounted price we were offering.http://www.futurehosting.com
Managed, Unmanaged VPS, Dedicated Servers, CDN
Available locations: Australia, Amsterdam, Detroit, London, Santa Clara, Miami0
-
10-07-2009, 10:15 AM #36Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Posts
- 42
Well with all of that said, Daku SHOULD pay the bill. Thanks Futurehost, it's always good to hear both sides of the story. I'm sure if he mentioned you guys tried to contact him about the overages / excessive usage he wouldn't have a case.
0
-
10-07-2009, 12:47 PM #37Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- India
- Posts
- 1,104
In a customer view its extremely a dreadful situation to pay for the traffic that Daku has not used for his personal/business purposes.
I knew some server resellers who reached to an extent of shutting down their business because of the bandwidth usage caused by their customers.
FH offered discount as much as they could to retain the customer. I feel sad for Daku's situation.AssistanZ - Beyond Boundaries...
Cloudstack Consultancy / 24x7 Web Hosting Support / 24x7 Server Management / Infrastructure Management Services
Web & Mobile Apps Development / Web Designing Services / Php, Grails, Java Development0
-
10-08-2009, 06:51 AM #38WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 131
Thanks for everyone who have given their comments.
I dont agree with certain people but then everyone is free to express their opinion.
I consider this to be totally illegitimate charges and wont pay any of those. This is just totally unacceptable to me that they let the bandwidth flow without shutting the system down when anyone working in this industry would have easily noticed something wrong.
I've offered them what I can afford but they think they going through the legal route will cost them less money! I don't have any problem with that.0
-
10-08-2009, 06:57 AM #39WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 131
Easy to say this but consider if someone is on holiday? Are you just going to sit and think "oh lord, what should I do, let the server do whatever it's doing as I've tried contacting the guy without a response or shall I shut the thing down before it does more damage to all of us?"
0
-
10-08-2009, 07:11 AM #40WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 131
0
-
10-08-2009, 11:49 AM #41Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 31
Sounds like a no-win for either side. There's no clear cut answer to it, however my best suggestion is to kill daku's server, and make him pay back in payments, with interest, for what he owes. If you do choose to arbitrate in court, I have the feeling that this is the sort of thing they might agree to.
Still not going to help EITHER side too well but if the man doesn't have the $1600 then suing him won't get it out of him either.
I think this is a good example of how shutting off a server when it exceeds bandwidth helps both client and hoster. Yes it is tempting for the hoster to NOT offer this so they can charge customers extra when they go a little over, thus more profits. However, you get the occasional situation like this where they get a LOT of extra bandwidth and can't pay. If the overage was like $25-30 I doubt this post would have made it here. However, daku is being asked to pay out more than a lot of people make in a month's salary.
I'm no lawyer, but no one is winning this one. It's either waste more money on lawyer fees and cause daku to have to pay money to his attorney in addition to the $1600.
Payments are my only suggestion as a sort of a compromise, but definitely cancel this guys account.
My best wishes go out to all involved.George
WPDaredevils.com - Not your momma's web experts!! Managed WP Hosting, SEO, development and more!
HostNewt - World-Class Business Web Hosting. The way it should be. (Coming soon!)
I'm always out to help anyone improve their site. Best way to start is at wpdd.xyz!0
-
10-09-2009, 02:25 AM #42Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 790
Catch a 10mbps spike? Come on, that's normal traffic for many people. Yes, even a big spike... advertising, new content put on a website, etc. It's pretty normal. Should FH have shut his VPS off and cost him potential sales or ad revenue? Lost him precious ad dollars?
0
-
10-09-2009, 03:10 AM #43Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 1,265
0
-
10-09-2009, 07:30 AM #44Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 31
George
WPDaredevils.com - Not your momma's web experts!! Managed WP Hosting, SEO, development and more!
HostNewt - World-Class Business Web Hosting. The way it should be. (Coming soon!)
I'm always out to help anyone improve their site. Best way to start is at wpdd.xyz!0
-
10-09-2009, 12:02 PM #45Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Posts
- 1,708
FH posted and said notices were sent to you and then they informed you of your server performing a DOS attack. I do not see how you weren't notified with what they posted and what you posted.
0
-
10-09-2009, 05:38 PM #46Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 1,182
We always turn of the VPS's when they are using more bandwidth than what was allocated to them. This way the client cannot say they didn't get an "email" about the bandwidth abuse and have to actually tell us they want to go over for the VPS to be put back online.
I don't think it's right for FH to allow this client to use so much bandwidth and then slap him with the fee. It was an oversight on FH, and the client. Customer Service should would waive this fee to keep the client. If this client was spiking the load of the vps server up to 50+ loads, his VPS would of been shut down by FH staff. Should of been the same way with his bandwidth...
I just think it's a little of both to blame. Yes the client 'should' have to pay something, but if FH wants to keep him they should waive it. If he goes over again the second month then I would start imposing fees. This was simply just a innocent mistake that the client wishes it never happened. No client wants to pay $1500 for a $50/mo VPS...
It's hard for a business to take losses like this for a client, but it only improves their appearance for other potential clients. That's if the FH did waive it and the client posted here how great they are...which never happens.www.opticip.com - Optic IP LLC
0
-
10-09-2009, 06:00 PM #47Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 790
Is that policy of shutting clients off in your terms of service?
If not, I could really easily see you getting sued.
If I signed up for hosting and I bought some advertising/whatever and my site got extremely popular and then my provider shut down my account without notice or warning. You can bet I would be extremely displeased and looking for recourse.0
-
10-09-2009, 06:21 PM #48Junior Guru
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Hull, UK
- Posts
- 222
That's a reasonable assumption to make in my view and I'm more or less certain most customers we have would take that line, but most hosts will however state in their ToS that they either shut down the account/VPS upon bandwidth being expended or they charge X per GB over and slap you with a nice bill; which can be met with equally as much disdain... The best thing to do would be to contact the host before you launched such a campaign in order to ensure that everyone is on the same page. Granted it doesn't always work that way, but a positive host/client relationship goes one heck of a long way in this day and age and it could just well save on a massive bill or account being suspended etc
With regards to this thread and what has happened, it seems a classic case of misunderstanding exactly what 'Fully Managed' means. Costly, frustrating but should be chalked up as experience. In the mean time I'd like to think that the host involved would recognise that the client appears unable to make such a large payment, even at a discounted rate, and would arrange an alternate deal in which all parties are satisfied. /ideal world speechLast edited by hertzwebsolutions; 10-09-2009 at 06:22 PM. Reason: couldn't spell properly
UK Based Hosting Company
HWS Hosting
http://www.hwshosting.net
We aim to please, open a ticket at sales@hwshosting.net0
-
10-09-2009, 06:28 PM #49Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 790
0
-
10-09-2009, 06:31 PM #50Junior Guru
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Hull, UK
- Posts
- 222
UK Based Hosting Company
HWS Hosting
http://www.hwshosting.net
We aim to please, open a ticket at sales@hwshosting.net0
Similar Threads
-
My Review of Futurehosting (futurehosting.biz)
By p00kster in forum VPS HostingReplies: 16Last Post: 08-05-2008, 08:04 AM -
Changing what apache tells in HEAD
By MattMans in forum Hosting Security and TechnologyReplies: 2Last Post: 07-10-2003, 03:08 PM -
Ababa tells you to review!!
By YUPAPA in forum Web Site ReviewsReplies: 13Last Post: 12-17-2002, 01:48 PM -
Dig tells me I have Bad Server
By freakysid in forum Hosting Security and TechnologyReplies: 1Last Post: 01-23-2002, 01:27 AM