View Poll Results: As a customer, what network would you most like to see paired with Level(3)?
- Voters
- 76. You may not vote on this poll
-
AT&T
9 11.84% -
Global Crossing
14 18.42% -
NTT/Verio
13 17.11% -
Qwest
3 3.95% -
Savvis
9 11.84% -
Sprint
3 3.95% -
Tata
6 7.89% -
TeliaSonera
10 13.16% -
Verizon Business
9 11.84%
Results 1 to 25 of 59
Thread: Carrier Selection
-
10-01-2009, 08:58 PM #1THE Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 6,957
Carrier Selection
As we have been extending our private peering relationships across the US and Europe we are also looking to consolidate our carriers to simply Tier 1 and/or near Tier 1 providers. One of these providers will certainly be Level(3), but we are still not fully decided on other carriers.
Now, what I am looking for here is, which network combination would most impress you as a customer/potential customer. I am not looking for price based analysis or analysis of dealing with a company's billing or support departments. I already have the data I need for those determinations. The point of this poll is solely to get end-user input as to overall network performance/reliability and how the network would compliment the existing carrier, Level(3). Please elaborate as to your decision in a post to the thread.
Note: We have already done significant research, this poll is simply to help confirm research we have already done or to bring about items/issues we may have overlooked or not considered. Figured we'd take advantage of the knowledge of this community before making a final decision.Karl Zimmerman - Founder & CEO of Steadfast
VMware Virtual Data Center Platform
karl @ steadfast.net - Sales/Support: 312-602-2689
Cloud Hosting, Managed Dedicated Servers, Chicago Colocation, and New Jersey Colocation
-
10-01-2009, 09:07 PM #2Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Dec 2000
- Location
- Sunny Florida (Orlando)
- Posts
- 409
I would personally like to see Level3/ATT/Savvis along with peering. Level3/ATT or Level3/Savvis plus peering would also be acceptable but the tri-bundle would be better
Webby Enterprises LLC - AS63031
Proudly Offering Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, VPS, Dedicated and Colo from Sunny Central Florida
In the business since 1997!
http://www.webbytech.net
-
10-01-2009, 09:09 PM #3THE Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 6,957
Karl Zimmerman - Founder & CEO of Steadfast
VMware Virtual Data Center Platform
karl @ steadfast.net - Sales/Support: 312-602-2689
Cloud Hosting, Managed Dedicated Servers, Chicago Colocation, and New Jersey Colocation
-
10-01-2009, 09:14 PM #4Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Dec 2000
- Location
- Sunny Florida (Orlando)
- Posts
- 409
ATT due to Bellsouth/ATT/SBCGlobal DSL/Uverse users.
I am on ATT DSL and to several Data Centers I take Level3 which ATT has a problem peering with, therefore causing issues.
Savvis due to their presence and usage in the commercial world.
I have always wanted to see what a ATT/Level3/Savvis network in Central US would preform.Webby Enterprises LLC - AS63031
Proudly Offering Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, VPS, Dedicated and Colo from Sunny Central Florida
In the business since 1997!
http://www.webbytech.net
-
10-02-2009, 07:18 AM #5Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 251
I'd like to see Level3, ATT, and Global or Tata. Would give nice coverage in the US, and also excellent coverage in non north american networks via Global or Tata (or both). Unsure what your target market is, but it cant hurt to have good access to the large european, south american and asian markets. You could easily cut out ATT if you feel L3 gives you enough peering in north america.
-
10-02-2009, 12:29 PM #6Randy
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Ashburn VA, San Diego CA
- Posts
- 4,615
My vote is NTT so you have better reach to Asia. Honestly it's a crap shoot; Level3 is so well connected you aren't going to see much difference by adding any single carrier to it.
Fast Serv Networks, LLC | AS29889 | DDOS Protected | Managed Cloud, Streaming, Dedicated Servers, Colo by-the-U
Since 2003 - Ashburn VA + San Diego CA Datacenters
-
10-02-2009, 04:48 PM #7Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2001
- Posts
- 1,045
No price barrier I would go with ATT/Verizon for domestic eyeballs and TATA for Europe/Asia. Tata is doing alot of expansion in the USA also I believe.
-
10-02-2009, 05:20 PM #8Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 1,111
I agree with this statement
We are using Telia specifically for European market, but Level3 has a good presence too anyway (along with Cogent, which recently has expanded to Europe too).
Looking for South American networks - again, Level 3 so far was the best (except NTT I think is providing Caribbean connectivity)
In US, probably Internap will be the best (I don't think you have them on your list)Professional Streaming services - http://www.tulix.com - info at tulix.com
Double optimized - AS36820) network, best for live streaming/VoIP/gaming
The best quality network - AS7219
-
10-02-2009, 05:27 PM #9Master of the Truth
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Reston, VA
- Posts
- 3,131
Yellow Fiber Networks
http://www.yellowfiber.net : Managed Solutions - Colocation - Network Services IPv4/IPv6
Ashburn/Denver/NYC/Dallas/Chicago Markets Served zak@yellowfiber.net
-
10-02-2009, 05:30 PM #10THE Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 6,957
Karl Zimmerman - Founder & CEO of Steadfast
VMware Virtual Data Center Platform
karl @ steadfast.net - Sales/Support: 312-602-2689
Cloud Hosting, Managed Dedicated Servers, Chicago Colocation, and New Jersey Colocation
-
10-02-2009, 05:39 PM #11Master of the Truth
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Reston, VA
- Posts
- 3,131
Yellow Fiber Networks
http://www.yellowfiber.net : Managed Solutions - Colocation - Network Services IPv4/IPv6
Ashburn/Denver/NYC/Dallas/Chicago Markets Served zak@yellowfiber.net
-
10-02-2009, 05:44 PM #12Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Posts
- 1,405
Cogent all the way!
Eleven2 Web Hosting - World-Wide Hosting, Done Right!
Shared Hosting | Reseller Hosting | Dedicated | Virtual Premium Servers
Server Locations in: Dallas | Los Angeles | Singapore | Amsterdam
-
10-02-2009, 05:55 PM #13THE Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 6,957
Karl Zimmerman - Founder & CEO of Steadfast
VMware Virtual Data Center Platform
karl @ steadfast.net - Sales/Support: 312-602-2689
Cloud Hosting, Managed Dedicated Servers, Chicago Colocation, and New Jersey Colocation
-
10-02-2009, 06:25 PM #14Master of the Truth
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Reston, VA
- Posts
- 3,131
Yellow Fiber Networks
http://www.yellowfiber.net : Managed Solutions - Colocation - Network Services IPv4/IPv6
Ashburn/Denver/NYC/Dallas/Chicago Markets Served zak@yellowfiber.net
-
10-04-2009, 09:15 AM #15Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 53
-
10-04-2009, 09:49 AM #16Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Stockholm
- Posts
- 43
I would personally/strongly recommend TeliaSonera and then GBLX for carrier. They are the only ones capable of handling very large amount of data and holding a very good uptime!
But, when it comes to $$$$ they might not be the cheapest solution. Therefore if budget is the issue I would recomment smaller (not fully) Tier1 operators such as Cogent!
But then again the question is in which continent most of your traffic will be coming from, because geographically chosen large operators might be a good solution too.
-
10-04-2009, 10:05 AM #17Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 1,224
I voted for Verizon only because of (a) the reach and peering of 701, even though it's not the venerable titan it once was, (b) the growing FIOS subscriber base, and (c) Verizon's large wireless network and the growth of web-enabled smartphones. VZ has a lot of eyeballs to reach.
Otherwise, I would have chosen SAVVIS because my past experience with them was very good. They have some of the lowest latency in the business, at least for the destinations we were reaching. My primary complaint is a shortage of POPs in our region, and the only way to pick them up (at least in our area) is OCx, no Ethernet.Last edited by Sekweta; 10-04-2009 at 10:16 AM.
-
10-04-2009, 10:38 AM #18Master of the Truth
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Reston, VA
- Posts
- 3,131
true tier1's don't pay for peering. Cogent is not 100% settlement free, or maybe they are but no one can give a definate answer. Ask many network operators on NANOG and they will all contest that they are not.
The wiki on tier1 still states that cogent still possibly pays for transit from L3 and/or sprint still.
Digging into cogents public financials you could probably get the answer if dug deep enough. But cogents CEO is blowing so much smoke up investors asses to save the company its not even funny anymore.Yellow Fiber Networks
http://www.yellowfiber.net : Managed Solutions - Colocation - Network Services IPv4/IPv6
Ashburn/Denver/NYC/Dallas/Chicago Markets Served zak@yellowfiber.net
-
10-04-2009, 12:45 PM #19Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 1,224
Not picking nits with anyone specific, just floating this as a general question: does it really matter if a company is tier 1?
I've had just as good, or better, service from non-tier 1 providers because they aren't dealing with the politics of (often overloaded) SFI peering links or disputes, or any of the number of problems that arise when two networks on equal footing suddenly start arguing which of them is king of the hill.
When network A has paid transit with B, C, and D, then we know B, C, D have a financial interest in making sure A's traffic is delivered. Otherwise A votes with its wallet and buys transit elsewhere. In an SFI peering arrangement, then A, B, C, D have less vested interest in sinking off traffic from the other for free. It's done as a courtesy.
Liken this to the hosting business. Who would get your priority support: a customer who pays $500/mo. for a server, or one who gets it for free under some barter arrangement? The answer is likely the one writing a check each month, even if you feel your barter deal is mutually beneficial.
-
10-05-2009, 11:56 AM #20Junior Guru
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
- Denver, Colorado
- Posts
- 190
This seems like a very odd opinion but I would say TATA (if you can reach a representative, they are hard to track down). TATA is one of the fastest growing backbone providers in the world and thus, has great international connectivity. If you are looking for better connections to say Asia and from what I have seen trend wise, a lot of people are looking for better connectivity to Asia from the US, then they are the way to go.
I know you are out there in Chicago Karl which makes you in the perfect place to reach all of the US and quite frankly, most US providers will be sufficient for that, especially Level(3). But if you want to reach a growing market need which is fast transport to Asia, I would seriously consider TATA. A lot less hops from Chicago to Asia and India, that is for sure.
I know this sounds like an advertisement for TATA and in no way am I or RRDC affiliated with them. Just have a strong opinion on this =D█ Peaktera - Infrastructure as a Service
█ Denver - VPS Virtual Private Servers | Cloud | Dedicated Servers | IP Transit | Enterprise Services | Colocation
█ Peaktera - www.Peaktera.com
-
10-07-2009, 01:45 AM #21Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- TX (home), CO (college)
- Posts
- 385
I put down NTT (a hop away from AT&T/SBCIS IIRC and Qwest and good to Asia) nowever Savvis tends to be good (SBCIS and CenturyTel backbones have a good amount of Savvis). Also TATA seems to be gaining a head of stream on global expansion.
About Verizon, it's probably good to note that the FiOS service isn't pure 701...
http://www.robtex.com/as/as19262.html
http://fixedorbit.com/AS/19/AS19262.htm
All that said, there's something to be said for a network that doesn't have to go to Denver to get to Dallas from Chicago (L3 is a prime example of this). I know GBLX has such a link and they're definitely a solid contender in the name space but I'm sure there are others.I see your bandwidth and raise you a gigabit
Recommendations: MDDHosting shared, Virpus high-BW VPS, 100TB/SoftLayer for awesome servers
-
10-07-2009, 07:06 AM #22Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 1,224
-
10-08-2009, 04:32 AM #23Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- Singapore
- Posts
- 205
what about PCCW, for asia customers?
█ http://www.hostforasia.com
█ Hosting Asia Networks with English & Chinese support
█ Registered in Singapore RCB53117457C
-
10-08-2009, 02:02 PM #24Disabled
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Posts
- 150
If it ain't broke don't fix it?
Level3, Savvis, nLayer, PCCW, Telia--that really sucks
What would be impressive though? Level3, Savvis, ATT, Verizon.
-
10-08-2009, 02:32 PM #25Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 1,224
Impressive. And expensive. Everything I've heard about VZ suggests they are tough to get any decent pricing on, without going to a wholesaler.
If the pricing was right, I can see value in a two-carrier mix of SAVVIS and InterNAP. InterNAP is a great way to get very close to several major carriers with one pipe. (Oddly, that was the business model of SAVVIS back in the 90's, before they got serious about their own backbone.)
And you can probably get better pricing with a higher commit to InterNAP than trying to duplicate the same aggregate bandwidth with several carriers at lower commits.Last edited by Sekweta; 10-08-2009 at 02:37 PM.
Similar Threads
-
VPS Selection
By tera45863 in forum VPS HostingReplies: 6Last Post: 03-25-2009, 11:31 AM -
VPS selection
By treo650 in forum VPS HostingReplies: 7Last Post: 08-16-2007, 11:21 AM -
Which Carrier Should We Add?
By KarlZimmer in forum Other ReviewsReplies: 16Last Post: 06-25-2005, 10:17 AM -
Becoming a Carrier
By Gibraltar in forum Hosting Security and TechnologyReplies: 4Last Post: 04-13-2002, 02:30 PM -
Help with Selection
By ashben in forum Web HostingReplies: 2Last Post: 04-16-2001, 11:49 AM