View Poll Results: Reliable?

Voters
23. You may not vote on this poll
  • Dual Opteron Quad Core 2356

    6 26.09%
  • Dual Xeon E5405

    7 30.43%
  • Intel Core i7 920

    8 34.78%
  • Intel Core i7 860

    4 17.39%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28
  1. #1

    Dual Opteron Quad Core 2356 vs Dual Xeon E5405 vs Intel Core i7 920

    poll:
    what You prefer? Reliable and high powerfull

    Dual Opteron Quad Core 2356 2.3hz
    Dual Xeon E5405 2.0hz
    Intel Core i7 920 2.66ghz
    Intel Core i7 860 2.8ghz

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,173
    Core i7's have been amazing when it comes to virtualization.
    www.DMEHosting.com - DME Hosting LLC | Servers, KVM/OpenVZ VPS's, Email Hosting, Web Hosting

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tech Belt
    Posts
    7,784
    Core i7 920 I'd have to say would be one of my picks, although the Dual Quad Opteron is pretty tempting. I'd say it all comes down to what you're gonna do, if its Virtualization the Core i7 might do a better job than the Dual opterons.
    #---.#---###### | Host Mist LLC - Helping People Say Hello World™
    #---.#---#--#--# || Shared, Reseller, Master Reseller, VPS, Dedicated
    ####---#--#--# }| Featuring multiple locations across the US & Germany.
    #---#---#--#--# #| Connecting the world through web hosting.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    India
    Posts
    843
    i will go with Dual Xeon E5405 it will be good
    HostNotch Hosting Services 99.9% uptime Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting
    yajur | Sales Team
    CPanel Hosting • R1 Soft • Offsite-Backup • Great Uptime
    http://hostnotch.com sales @ hostnotch.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    6,790
    For most server uses the i7 options would be the least powerful, as you'd only have four processing cores, while you have 8 with the dual CPU options. Out of the dual CPU options the AMD should give you better performance as they're clock-for-clock roughly the same as the Intel's, but that one has a higher clock speed.
    Karl Zimmerman - Steadfast: Managed Dedicated Servers and Premium Colocation
    karl @ steadfast.net - Sales/Support: 312-602-2689
    Cloud Hosting, Managed Dedicated Servers, Chicago Colocation, and New Jersey Colocation
    Now Open in New Jersey! - Contact us for New Jersey colocation or dedicated servers

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by KarlZimmer View Post
    For most server uses the i7 options would be the least powerful, as you'd only have four processing cores, while you have 8 with the dual CPU options. Out of the dual CPU options the AMD should give you better performance as they're clock-for-clock roughly the same as the Intel's, but that one has a higher clock speed.
    yes but i7 show 8 CPU

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    6,790
    Quote Originally Posted by Up2vps View Post
    yes but i7 show 8 CPU
    Yes, with Hyperthreading you see 8, it physically has 4 cores. The physical cores is what will get you actual processing power.
    Karl Zimmerman - Steadfast: Managed Dedicated Servers and Premium Colocation
    karl @ steadfast.net - Sales/Support: 312-602-2689
    Cloud Hosting, Managed Dedicated Servers, Chicago Colocation, and New Jersey Colocation
    Now Open in New Jersey! - Contact us for New Jersey colocation or dedicated servers

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C.
    Posts
    2,543
    Quote Originally Posted by KarlZimmer View Post
    Yes, with Hyperthreading you see 8, it physically has 4 cores. The physical cores is what will get you actual processing power.
    At the CPU level, hyperthreading allows two threads running concurrently on the same core at different stages in the pipeline to be presented as two separate processor units to the OS. However, without hyperthreading, you are able to run multiple instructions on the same core at different stages of the pipeline anyway for any x86 cpu since 486. As not all instructions can be pipelined in this manner, hyperthreading will allow for better utilization of each core but nowhere near double.

    With both hyperthreading and architectural improvements, one nehalem core averages around 25% more performance clock per clock in comparison to Core 2 in benchmarks. Real-world performance would depend on your application, but just using benchmarks to formulate a rough estimate using the clockspeeds of the listed CPU's, you would get more processing power out of the dual CPU configurations.

    i.e. some very rough calculations
    Dual Opteron Quad Core 2356 2.3hz - 8 x 2.3GHz = 18.4GHz
    Dual Xeon E5405 2.0hz - 8 x 2.0GHz = 16.0GHz
    Intel Core i7 920 2.66ghz - 1.25 x 4 x 2.66GHz = 13.3GHz
    Intel Core i7 860 2.8ghz - 1.25 x 4 x 2.8GHz = 14.0GHz

    So as Karl said, the Dual Opteron Quad Core 2356 configuration would be expected to have the best performance for most applications.

    Now, if your application sees 31% or more performance increase with Nehalem, you would see better performance with the new single CPU configurations. (8/5 / 2.8/2.3 = 1.31)
    Last edited by hhw; 09-18-2009 at 06:32 PM.
    ASTUTE HOSTING: Advanced, customized, and scalable solutions with AS54527 Premium Canadian Optimized Network
    MicroServers.io: Enterprise Dedicated Hardware with IPMI at VPS-like Prices with AS63213 Affordable Bandwidth in Canada and beyond
    Dedicated Hosting, Colo, Bandwidth, and Fiber out of Vancouver, Seattle, LA, Toronto, NYC, Miami, and London

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    217
    Quote Originally Posted by hhw View Post
    At the CPU level, hyperthreading allows two threads running concurrently on the same core at different stages in the pipeline to be presented as two separate processor units to the OS. However, without hyperthreading, you are able to run multiple instructions on the same core at different stages of the pipeline anyway for any x86 cpu since 486. As not all instructions can be pipelined in this manner, hyperthreading will allow for better utilization of each core but nowhere near double.

    With both hyperthreading and architectural improvements, one nehalem core averages around 25% more performance clock per clock in comparison to Core 2 in benchmarks. Real-world performance would depend on your application, but just using benchmarks to formulate a rough estimate using the clockspeeds of the listed CPU's, you would get more processing power out of the dual CPU configurations.

    i.e. some very rough calculations
    Dual Opteron Quad Core 2356 2.3hz - 8 x 2.3GHz = 18.4GHz
    Dual Xeon E5405 2.0hz - 8 x 2.0GHz = 16.0GHz
    Intel Core i7 920 2.66ghz - 1.25 x 4 x 2.66GHz = 13.3GHz
    Intel Core i7 860 2.8ghz - 1.25 x 4 x 2.8GHz = 14.0GHz

    So as Karl said, the Dual Opteron Quad Core 2356 configuration would be expected to have the best performance.
    Actually the i7 920 would beat the dual Quad 2356 barcelonas by roughly 20% or so. The only reason you should get the Dual quad Opterons is if you need more than 12GB of ram that the i7 920 will give you.

  10. #10
    i already Have Dual Quad Opteron with 32gb Ram I plan to get new another server and I want the option,

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    217
    Quote Originally Posted by Up2vps View Post
    i already Have Dual Quad Opteron with 32gb Ram I plan to get new another server and I want the option,
    i7 920 performance:

    http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/...81024-05720.ps

    Dual 2356 Opteron performance

    http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/...0623-04654.pdf

    So i7 gets 109/102 SpecInt vs Opteron 102/87. 7-15% difference.

    If you need 32GB ram, get Dual E5504s which gives you up to 72GB ram. Benchs around 137 SpecInt.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C.
    Posts
    2,543
    Quote Originally Posted by tshen83 View Post
    i7 920 performance:

    http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/...81024-05720.ps

    Dual 2356 Opteron performance

    http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/...0623-04654.pdf

    So i7 gets 109/102 SpecInt vs Opteron 102/87. 7-15% difference.

    If you need 32GB ram, get Dual E5504s which gives you up to 72GB ram. Benchs around 137 SpecInt.
    SPECint's CINT2006 and benchmarks are more oriented towards scientific computing, which is a much different application than your typical hosting environment. Unfortunately, there aren't any SPECweb results for these CPU's yet.

    That's not to say the benchmarks I looked at to derive my very arbitrary 25% were the best reference either (Anandtech if anybody cares), but are somewhat more balanced workloads than raw integer and floating point performance.
    ASTUTE HOSTING: Advanced, customized, and scalable solutions with AS54527 Premium Canadian Optimized Network
    MicroServers.io: Enterprise Dedicated Hardware with IPMI at VPS-like Prices with AS63213 Affordable Bandwidth in Canada and beyond
    Dedicated Hosting, Colo, Bandwidth, and Fiber out of Vancouver, Seattle, LA, Toronto, NYC, Miami, and London

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    217
    SpecWeb is heavily IO dependent, and favors max memory configs. So dual Socket systems with obscene 8GB DIMM ram win all the time.

    SpecPower2008 is the newest benchmark people look at, which is aggregate performance per watt at different load levels. So I base my decisions on SpecPower2008 ratings per dollar now.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Jose, CA.
    Posts
    1,622
    As a server builder... I'm inclined to say the Dual Opteron boxes...
    However, they real ly would be much better as Shanghai not Barcelona cores.
    Daved @ Lightwave Networking, LLC.
    AS1426 https:/www.lightwave.net
    Primary Bandwidth: EGIHosting (NLayer, NTT, HE, Cogent)
    Xen PV VPS Hosting

  15. #15
    I used both i7 920(HT) and dual e5502(**2.2G), I7 920 with HT tech is obvious faster. about Dual Opteron Quad Core 2356 2.3hz i haven't used amd, however, i don't think it has better performance than top2

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Intel P4 $69,Core2Duos starting $95,Quad Core $139,2x Dual Core AMD Opteron $159
    By B2Netsolutions|Adull in forum Dedicated Hosting Offers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-18-2009, 11:19 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-03-2009, 06:32 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-22-2009, 05:33 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-15-2009, 12:08 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-07-2009, 12:26 PM

Related Posts from theWHIR.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •