Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1

    Wink Hi anyone who has used both linux and windows host explain the pros and cons

    Hi all. I currently use linux hosting. I am considering windows hosting.

    Am one with unbiased opinion. I.E. maybe has used both.

    What are the real differences as far as ease of use and power.

    Any advice greatly appreciated.

  2. #2 may want to try a search of Google for this subject...sure I've seen it argued elsewhere...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Its the difference of applications mostly.......

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    you should only choose one over the other for programing reasons really. alot of people will talk about security, tho a properly maintained windows machine is just as secure
    l • 201TB bandwidth as standard in three USA DC’s. KVMoIP, auto reboot & OS install all included - Now available in the Netherlands!
    l • UK, USA & NL unmetered 100mb & 1GB 100TB premium bandwidth servers
    l Assiva Ltd • UK Shared & Reseller LiteSpeed • 10 years of hosting • R1Soft

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Bay Area, California
    If you've primarily used Linux/Unix based hosting, many of the control panels styles you have gotten used to will not be the same on a windows based host.

    The most notable difference will be with your sites dynamic content and database activity.

    If you're doing a lot of MySQL, PHP, or CGI scripting on your Unix/Linux host and you switch to a windows based host, you may have to do review on all of your software in order to migrate things. You'll also probably need to switch from MySQL databases to MSSQL databases. This in itself would keep me from making the switch.

    If you just run a simple site with no dynamic content, then you probably won't notice much difference.

    From personal experience, I have found a well managed Linux/Unix server is considerably more stable than a windows server. Anyone who claims otherwise simply doesn't know how to use the tools available to them in order to keep their server stable.

    Performance comparisons is a sticky area to get into. Unless you're running a high-profile site you won't notice much.

    Hope this helps,


  6. #6
    Security and programming issues aside, the most notable difference is PRICE.

    Linux hosting is almost cheaper 99.9% of the time than the next comparable Windows type hosting. - Low cost multi domain hosting solutions. [Legal adult content friendly]
    Reliable web site hosting is our motto. We have Alertra stats to back that up.
    Proven provider of high quality shared and reseller accounts since 2002.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Ive used both. (Caldera eserver, redhat 7.X, windows 2000 server) platforms.

    I find linux to be nice in many of the command line functions that are do-able.

    Windows is far easier in many ways for the basic configuration(s). (Though both OS's get complex when complex things are done)

    I only have a year or so of experience in Linux, so I am nowhere near as comfortable as I am with windows, having used it for the past 5 or 6 years or so after Amiga went bust.

    Many operations in Linux are somewhat obscure, and documentation is difficult to find at times. Variants of linux are not always completely standard to each other, so it can cause occasional issues.

    Newsgroups and message boards for Linux are populated by a LOT of extremely surly, childish, and arrogent overgrown children. The general attitude seems to be "If you can't fix it, RTFM, if that doesnt help, kill yourself because you are stupid"

    Windows has a few (well known) security flaws and exploits that need to be patched, and software takes somewhat more horsepower, and it costs more money.

    Support for win products (free webpages, newsgroups, etc) is a lot easier to find and people there are generally happier to help.

    some MS software is junk (avoid exchange like the plague--its takes pretty much its own server and tons of resources) but much is excellent from companies other than MS.

    Keep your win server patched and hotfixed, and you should be all set.

    also--make the use of the best of both worlds...install PHP and Perl support on your winserver and use some great things out there.)

    I find MS to just be so much easier to install, uninstall, maintain and deal with than my linux servers were.

    (sendmail configurations can be a nightmare)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    MO, USA
    I've been dealing with the same issues migrating a current site to another host, but some of the following are platform issues you may want to consider:

    ASP: Win - Very Common Full ASP with vbscript, Linux - Uncommon Apache ASP (no vbscript)
    JSP: Win - Very Rare, Linux - Uncommon
    PHP: Win - Very Common, Linux - Very Common
    CGI: Win - Very Common, Linux - Very Common

    MS Access: Win - Very Common, Linux - None
    MSSQL: Win - Common, Linux - None
    mySQL: Win - Rare, Linux - Very Common

    Other Features:
    Multiple FTP: Win - Rare, Linux - Common
    Subdomains: Win - Uncommon, Linux - Common
    Control Panel: Win - Uncommon, Linux - Common

    Price: Win slightly more expensive than Linux
    Stability: Linux tends to be more stable than Win
    Compatibility: Win tends to have more software available, but rare to find everything installed (such as JSP and mySQL).

    Although a majority of these technologies are available on both platforms, they haven't typically been fully implemented across platforms. You'll need to evaluate your personal development needs and may be restricted to a certain platform because of it. Basically if you need something like vbscript, MS Access, or MSSQL, you'll probably need a Win platform, but if you need multiple ftp accounts, subdomains, JSP, or mySQL, it would be easier to find those on a Linux platform although you may find them on Win also.
    Last edited by Alex042; 11-15-2002 at 09:15 AM.

  9. #9

    We manage Windows NT, 2000, Linux, Sun Solaris, and FreeBSD.

    Windows 2000 provides a gigantic improvement over Windows NT in terms of speed and reliaibility.

    However, both are still night and day when it comes to the Unix operating systems. shows 64 security related patches to date to Microsoft Windows.

    I would have to check the patches for RedHat Linux, but I would bet they are around the half or less mark (in terms of quantity) than those released by Microsoft.

    If Sun continues to show their pattern as previous years, then they are about 1/5th to 1/3rd the number of patches as Microsoft.

    There is a lot of free to low cost open source software for Unix operating systems especially Linux.

    As others pointed out, it is usually easier to have higher up time on Unix operating systems than on Windows.

    Thank you.
    Peter M. Abraham
    LinkedIn Profile

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts