View Poll Results: Your Opinion of DV2? (after they turned up Williams & Verio)

Voters
29. You may not vote on this poll
  • Much better now!

    14 48.28%
  • Equal

    12 41.38%
  • They wouldn't have need the new carriers

    3 10.34%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 38 of 38
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    3,734
    Originally posted by rochen
    Since the instillation of the new Verio and Williams lines we have had 100% uptime (so far) from DV2. It would be even better if Cogent was replaced with the likes of AT&T and pulled completely
    Why would they want to lower their current quality by doing that???

  2. #27
    sailor :Are you a customer or competitor of ours btw?
    I am a customer but we should all follow rules, Without the rules this forum would be shambles and not as popular as it is today.

    I remember when i first got my servers at dv2 i was promised a few different bandwidth providers and it seemed to be switched off over time when all the Chapter 11 stuff started to accure with dv2.

    The network has improved and so did the speeds but to be honest i got sic of waiting for the so called Williams Lines and Verio Lines etc and i did not believe like many others they would come.

    I have now stepped away from dv2 and moving customers over to a new facility were we have our own equipment etc. Our server will expire at the end of the month.

    Eservers.biz have been magic through the whole time i was a customer, a few times that we were not informed about things but to be honest i believe its bescause they were not informed etc.

    Anyway bottom line dv2 has improved alittle even with the new connections but i would still recommend going through eservers.biz first.

    Kind regards
    Phillip
    www.SURRENDERONLINE.com.au
    Perfect Solutions Every Time! Sydney Based :: Dedicated Servers :: Colocation :: Superior Support::Reseller Solutions

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    4,420

    thanks

    thanks for your business while you were with us. I hope your new endeavor as a server owner works out for you. I believe I have followed the rules and am a productive member of the forum and I hope you stay one too - best of luck. sailor
    Dedicated Servers
    WWW.NETDEPOT.COM
    Since 2000

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    4,420

    thanks

    thanks for your business while you were with us. I hope your new endeavor as a server owner works out for you. I believe I have followed the rules and am a productive member of the forum and I hope you stay one too - best of luck. sailor
    Dedicated Servers
    WWW.NETDEPOT.COM
    Since 2000

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,963
    Originally posted by clocker1996
    dv2 had just cogent before, right?

    So did they like get rid of cogent and get williams and verio? or ?
    did they set it up so its williams and verio in, and cogent out? or how is it setup? anyone know

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    4,420

    network

    Originally posted by clocker1996
    no - we had aleron, cogent and netrail before - three distinct different networks and 3 distinct different 100 meg connections.

    we how have a gig to verio, a gig to williams, and a 100 meg to cogent and 100 meg to aleron.
    Dedicated Servers
    WWW.NETDEPOT.COM
    Since 2000

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,963
    hm ok. Care to traceroute these 3 hosts/ips ?

    yahoo.com

    mnsi.net

    205.177.13.2

  8. #33
    Clocker, you're off topic man.
    dotGig
    <:<: [Fruit eating linux administrator]

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Nr Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    525
    Yahoo.com
    root@server [~]# traceroute yahoo.com
    traceroute: Warning: yahoo.com has multiple addresses; using 66.218.71.198
    traceroute to yahoo.com (66.218.71.198), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
    1 209.51.131.241 (209.51.131.241) 0.555 ms 0.332 ms 0.322 ms
    2 f13.ba01.b000173-0.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.28.253) 0.626 ms 0.644 ms 0.624 ms
    3 g9-2.core01.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.5.245) 0.425 ms 0.437 ms 0.314 ms
    4 p14-0.core02.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.126) 12.503 ms 12.571 ms 12.366 ms
    5 p14-0.pr01.iad01.atlas.psi.net (154.54.2.202) 15.869 ms 13.631 ms 13.315 ms
    6 yahoo.iad01.atlas.psi.net (154.54.10.2) 13.333 ms 13.215 ms 14.010 ms
    7 ge-2-2-0-p805.pat2.pao.yahoo.com (216.115.98.45) 80.165 ms 102.107 ms 80.156 ms
    8 vl11.bas2.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.64.138) 80.683 ms 80.415 ms 80.875 ms
    9 alteon3.68.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.68.12) 81.192 ms 80.581 ms 80.830 ms
    mnsi.net
    root@server [~]# traceroute mnsi.net
    traceroute to mnsi.net (206.48.122.4), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
    1 209.51.131.241 (209.51.131.241) 0.718 ms 0.384 ms 0.357 ms
    2 f13.ba01.b000173-0.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.28.253) 1.037 ms 0.753 ms 0.706 ms
    3 g9-2.core01.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.5.245) 0.650 ms 0.335 ms 0.436 ms
    4 g3-0.pr1.atl01.netrail.net (66.28.28.202) 0.516 ms 0.643 ms 0.459 ms
    5 205.215.2.54 (205.215.2.54) 0.717 ms 0.462 ms 0.364 ms
    6 atl-core-03.inet.qwest.net (205.171.21.105) 0.991 ms 1.265 ms 1.296 ms
    7 kcm-core-02.inet.qwest.net (205.171.205.57) 41.598 ms 41.553 ms 55.383 ms
    8 kcm-core-01.inet.qwest.net (205.171.29.125) 41.487 ms 41.591 ms 41.474 ms
    9 chi-core-03.inet.qwest.net (205.171.5.209) 46.486 ms 46.335 ms 46.031 ms
    10 chi-edge-09.inet.qwest.net (205.171.20.126) 45.977 ms 46.198 ms 46.739 ms
    11 63.236.236.118 (63.236.236.118) 53.640 ms 52.829 ms 52.950 ms
    12 lithium.mnsi.net (206.48.122.4) 53.517 ms * 53.308 ms
    205.177.13.2
    root@server [~]# traceroute 205.177.13.2
    traceroute to 205.177.13.2 (205.177.13.2), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
    1 209.51.131.241 (209.51.131.241) 0.604 ms 0.371 ms 0.303 ms
    2 f13.ba01.b000173-0.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.28.253) 0.657 ms 0.530 ms 0.643 ms
    3 g9-2.core01.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.5.245) 0.367 ms 0.340 ms 0.289 ms
    4 p14-0.core02.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.126) 12.495 ms 12.592 ms 12.265 ms
    5 p15-0.core01.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.21) 12.817 ms 12.509 ms 12.267 ms
    6 mae-east.cais.net (198.32.187.147) 17.863 ms 15.151 ms 15.449 ms
    7 pos5-2.core1.mcl.cais.net (63.216.0.33) 16.836 ms 15.937 ms 16.169 ms
    8 * * *
    9 * * *
    etc
    That should keep u amused
    And that was from my server @ eServers (dv2) to those addresses.

    James

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    4,420

    and your point is?

    Originally posted by clocker1996
    hm ok. Care to traceroute these 3 hosts/ips ?

    yahoo.com

    mnsi.net

    205.177.13.2
    why these 3?
    what is your goal you are looking to accomplish?
    Dedicated Servers
    WWW.NETDEPOT.COM
    Since 2000

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,963

    Re: and your point is?

    Originally posted by sailor


    why these 3?
    what is your goal you are looking to accomplish?
    if you must know.... i was interested in buying a server from eservers, or a place that sells servers in dv2

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,963
    Originally posted by Samuel
    Clocker, you're off topic man.
    could care less, sorry.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    The South
    Posts
    5,408
    Originally posted by rochen
    Since the instillation of the new Verio and Williams lines we have had 100% uptime (so far) from DV2. It would be even better if Cogent was replaced with the likes of AT&T and pulled completely
    I've gotta say, I have a couple servers, well I had 12 servers, now I have _1_ server and it doesn't have customers on it, colocated on an AT&T link (12.37.166.XX network, I forget offhand which IPs I still have active find one that's alive and try it) and I am TOTALLY unhappy with the uptime of the network that server is on, I've moved allthe others elsewhere and couldn't be more pleased with the results of the move.

    My server (even when it was just cogent) at dv2 had a MUCH MUCH better uptime than the AT&T hosted servers, as did my servers at Rackshack, much better than the AT&T servers.
    Gary Harris - the artist formerly known as Dixiesys
    resident grumpy redneck

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •