Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 53

Thread: Dv2

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    3,734

    Re: network

    Originally posted by sailor

    open a ticket with a trace if you have a problem - we will play with the routes to try to get you the best connection.

    I know you will...I'm not loudly complaining. I opened a ticket a while back. I know you take care of us all.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    4,420

    verio

    verio is opening up in the next 5 minutes

    we took prefs off natnet 30 minutes ago
    Dedicated Servers
    WWW.NETDEPOT.COM
    Since 2000

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Darmstadt, Germany
    Posts
    1,096
    saw it ... had a much better route via netnet from my server @servint ... but it's still ok via wcg.
    just my two 0,02$

    best regards,
    In just two days, tomorrow will be yesterday.

  4. #29
    Great now with Williams.. Here in Australia im another 100ms back


    4 days left now.... cant wait.....

    Kind regards
    Phillip
    www.SURRENDERONLINE.com.au
    Perfect Solutions Every Time! Sydney Based :: Dedicated Servers :: Colocation :: Superior Support::Reseller Solutions

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    167
    [209.51.139.242]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
    2 16 ms 15 ms 21 ms ras02-256addr192-0-client.dsl.frii.net [216.17.192.254]
    3 16 ms 16 ms 17 ms gw07-fe0-0-4-core.ftc.frii.net [216.17.128.190]
    4 35 ms * * gw03-atm1-0-32-core.den.frii.com [216.17.129.6]
    5 20 ms * 20 ms gw01-fe0-0-core.den.frii.net [216.17.129.73]
    6 50 ms * 45 ms f29.ba01.b006467-1.den01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.250.5.253]
    7 45 ms * 44 ms g9-2.core01.den01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.5.21]
    8 * * 45 ms p5-0.core01.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.30]
    9 53 ms 58 ms * p5-0.core02.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.37]
    10 59 ms 54 ms 61 ms p15-0.core01.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.25]
    11 63 ms 64 ms 69 ms p13-0.core01.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.98]
    12 * 88 ms 80 ms p15-0.core01.tpa01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.46]
    13 81 ms 85 ms 89 ms p5-0.core01.mco01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.141]
    14 88 ms * 86 ms p14-0.core01.jax01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.154]
    15 77 ms * 77 ms p5-0.core01.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.138]
    16 77 ms 84 ms 78 ms g50.ba01.b000173-0.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.5.246]
    17 * * * Request timed out.
    18 * * * Request timed out.
    19 * * * Request timed out.
    20 * * * Request timed out.
    21 * * * Request timed out.
    22 * * * Request timed out.
    23 * * * Request timed out.
    24 * * * Request timed out.
    25 * * * Request timed out.
    26 * * * Request timed out.
    27 * * * Request timed out.
    28 * * * Request timed out.
    29 * * * Request timed out.
    30 * * * Request timed out.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    3,734
    Yeah, I've just gotten a bunch of reports from customers with very similar tracroutes.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    5,383
    My pings through cogent were 320ms now their 600ms through williams
    Clustered Hosting With Continuous Data Protection (CDP)
    http://www.solidinternet.com
    8 Years of hosting excellence!

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    2,611
    Yeah, im getting about 700 ms here myself through williams. I would like to see more ( if any ) bandwidth pumping through verio rather than cogent and williams, as from what I hear, they perform quite the same. Ill have to submit a ticket to the eservers folks.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    5,383
    Seems to be Aus end.

    traceroute to 202.45.119.210 (202.45.119.210), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
    1 209.51.142.185 (209.51.142.185) 0.603 ms 0.423 ms 0.322 ms
    2 dv2-atl-core-core-b.dv2.net (209.51.131.2) 0.532 ms 0.600 ms 0.502 ms
    3 209.51.130.34 (209.51.130.34) 0.802 ms 0.722 ms 0.446 ms
    4 10.30.30.1 (10.30.30.1) 0.721 ms 0.940 ms 0.870 ms
    5 atlnga6lce1-atm.wcg.net (64.200.126.69) 0.982 ms 0.697 ms 0.823 ms
    6 drvlga1wcx1-pos4-0.wcg.net (64.200.127.81) 1.274 ms 1.619 ms 1.540 ms
    7 dllstx1wcx3-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.240.21) 62.413 ms 62.607 ms 63.262 ms
    8 anhmca1wcx2-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.240.6) 62.940 ms 62.607 ms 62.788 ms
    9 anhmca1wcx3-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.143.78) 62.766 ms 62.744 ms 62.854 ms
    10 snfcca1wcx2-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.240.2) 62.537 ms 62.926 ms 62.635 ms
    11 snfcca1wcx3-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.199.74) 63.059 ms 62.591 ms 62.821 ms
    12 sntcca2lce1-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.210.178) 62.412 ms 62.239 ms 62.386 ms
    13 f0-0.pabr1.netgate.net.nz (198.32.176.97) 62.700 ms 62.422 ms 63.280 ms
    14 g2-0-2.pabr2.global-gateway.net.nz (202.50.245.19) 65.424 ms 64.594 ms 62
    .818 ms
    15 connect.sybr3.global-gateway.net.nz (202.50.119.98) 334.881 ms 340.490 ms
    340.364 ms
    16 atm6-1-0-1.bdr1.per.connect.com.au (203.63.112.66) 390.318 ms 380.347 ms
    359.870 ms
    17 fastethernet0-0.cor2.per.connect.com.au (203.63.113.82) 361.401 ms 352.894
    ms 333.096 ms
    18 DNET3155-9.gw.connect.com.au (210.9.196.129) 327.313 ms 331.741 ms 342.88
    4 ms
    19 * * *
    20 * * *
    21 dsl-202-45-119-210.WA.netspace.net.au (202.45.119.210) 351.153 ms 409.624 ms 324.420 ms
    Clustered Hosting With Continuous Data Protection (CDP)
    http://www.solidinternet.com
    8 Years of hosting excellence!

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    960
    Originally posted by Haze
    Yeah, im getting about 700 ms here myself through williams. I would like to see more ( if any ) bandwidth pumping through verio rather than cogent and williams, as from what I hear, they perform quite the same. Ill have to submit a ticket to the eservers folks.
    Yeah, I'd also like to see more bandwith pumping thru Verio instead of Cogent and Williams. Verio rocks!

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    2,611
    Well, I don't seem to be getting any problems close to home as you are Robert, but I am getting packet loss on the williams and cogent lines ( keeps switching between the 2 ). I'm now being told that its normal traffic congestion.. which I find very wierd myself

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    771
    I am getting 50% packet loss! This is thru the Williams connection.

    Time to ring williams


    *starts Verio chant*

    VERIO, VERIO, VERIO!

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,783
    The slowdown from OZ is Telstra

    From a server in CA.
    [root@ros root]# traceroute techark.com
    traceroute to techark.com (209.51.136.34), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
    1 66.111.35.1 (66.111.35.1) 0.408 ms 0.326 ms 0.308 ms
    2 66.111.47.2 (66.111.47.2) 0.936 ms 0.608 ms 0.551 ms
    3 paix.he.net (198.32.176.20) 1.582 ms 1.417 ms 1.283 ms
    4 f0.pao1.verio.net (198.32.176.14) 2.582 ms 1.724 ms 1.628 ms
    5 ge-6-1-0.r06.plalca01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.3.53) 1.890 ms 1.638 ms 1.671 ms
    6 p16-1-1-0.r20.plalca01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.3.80) 2.073 ms 2.003 ms 1.881 ms
    7 p16-1-1-1.r20.dllstx01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.4.104) 73.079 ms 73.108 ms 72.938 ms
    8 p64-0-0-0.r21.dllstx01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.3.41) 72.972 ms 73.051 ms 72.906 ms
    9 p16-2-0-0.r00.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.5.35) 73.391 ms 73.554 ms 73.043 ms
    10 p16-6-0-0.r01.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.2.75) 73.050 ms 73.246 ms 72.974 ms
    11 p16-7-0-0.r02.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.5.21) 73.319 ms 81.216 ms 73.025 ms
    12 p16-1-1-3.r20.mclnva02.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.2.180) 74.735 ms 74.564 ms 74.533 ms
    13 p16-0-0-0.r00.atlnga03.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.2.49) 90.256 ms 90.004 ms 89.986 ms
    14 ge-1-2-0.r01.atlnga03.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.5.246) 90.196 ms 89.810 ms 89.825 ms
    15 ge-1-0-0.a00.atlnga03.us.ra.verio.net (129.250.25.66) 90.023 ms 89.811 ms 89.899 ms
    16 ge-1-1.a02.atlnga03.us.ra.verio.net (129.250.26.229) 90.291 ms 90.146 ms 89.825 ms
    17 ge-3-3.a02.atlnga03.us.ce.verio.net (157.238.161.42) 76.523 ms 76.343 ms 76.407 ms
    18 10.10.10.2 (10.10.10.2) 76.574 ms 76.659 ms 76.314 ms
    19 . (66.205.208.100) 76.887 ms 76.344 ms 76.236 ms
    20 209.51.130.33 (209.51.130.33) 88.257 ms 87.987 ms 87.932 ms
    21 209.51.136.34 (209.51.136.34) 89.077 ms 88.681 ms 88.740 ms

    From OZ:

    traceroute to CPE-203-45-234-52.qld.bigpond.net.au (203.45.234.52), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
    1 209.51.136.33 (209.51.136.33) 1.658 ms 1.403 ms 1.283 ms
    2 f13.ba01.b000173-0.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.28.253) 1.731 ms 1.511 ms 1.535 ms
    3 g0-2.core01.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.5.241) 1.567 ms 1.507 ms 1.228 ms
    4 g6-1.core03.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.162) 1.244 ms 5.440 ms 1.355 ms
    5 ge4-0.er1.atl4.us.mfnx.net (64.124.51.161) 1.557 ms 1.808 ms 1.407 ms
    6 so-3-0-0.cr2.atl2.us.mfnx.net (208.184.232.17) 1.763 ms 2.087 ms 1.588 ms
    7 so-5-0-0.cr2.dfw2.us.mfnx.net (216.200.127.226) 18.879 ms 18.967 ms 18.593 ms
    8 pos1-0.mpr1.dfw2.us.mfnx.net (216.200.127.218) 18.754 ms 18.683 ms 18.563 ms
    9 pos13-0.cr7.sjc2.us.mfnx.net (208.184.232.82) 73.573 ms 77.957 ms 73.774 ms
    10 so-6-2-0.mpr4.sjc2.us.mfnx.net (64.125.30.14) 73.542 ms 73.842 ms 73.376 ms
    11 pos6-0.mpr2.pao1.us.mfnx.net (208.185.175.162) 73.591 ms 73.410 ms 73.667 ms
    12 * cwhkt-above-100M.above.net (208.185.237.70) 77.081 ms 76.636 ms
    13 202.84.251.69 (202.84.251.69) 64.425 ms * *
    14 i-6-0.sjc-core01.net.reach.com (202.84.251.50) 64.860 ms 65.209 ms 66.121 ms
    15 202.84.143.42 (202.84.143.42) 252.648 ms 253.487 ms *
    16 GigabitEthernet1-1.pad-core4.Sydney.telstra.net (203.50.13.241) 253.571 ms 251.846 ms *
    17 Pos12-0.ken-core4.Sydney.telstra.net (203.50.6.21) 254.137 ms 252.955 ms 253.605 ms
    18 Pos4-0.woo-core1.Brisbane.telstra.net (203.50.6.222) 265.446 ms 264.008 ms 263.003 ms
    19 GigabitEthernet1-2.cha23.Brisbane.telstra.net (203.50.50.33) 265.922 ms 261.787 ms 263.741 ms
    20 tcbroad1.lnk.telstra.net (139.130.193.118) 264.738 ms 264.795 ms 263.557 ms
    21 ubr200-fe1.qld-remote.bigpond.net.au (61.9.209.15) 264.461 ms 265.386 ms 265.272 ms
    22 CPE-203-45-234-52.qld.bigpond.net.au (203.45.234.52) 273.393 ms 285.055 ms *

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    521
    I told ya William sucked =) http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showth...threadid=82805
    I've had some bad experiences with RackShack stopping inbound traffic on their Time Warner connections, causing chaos as everything routes through Williams instead. Doesn't go well for customers needing low pings.

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    771
    yay.. uploading at 51 bytes/sec on a cable 1.5mbps connection!

    Go williams!

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    960
    Sailor, I think it's time to turn off Williams and turn that Verio link up!

    I've never been impressed by Williams myself, but with Verio, I've had a virtual server there for over 3 years and has been 110% satisfied with their network speed.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Auckland - New Zealand
    Posts
    1,575
    I'm getting the best pings and traces ever from NZ at the mo

    #1 Unavailable (192.168.1.254): TTL Exceeded, ttl=255, 9 ms
    #2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (xxxxxxxxxxxx): TTL Exceeded, ttl=63, 50 ms
    #3 Unavailable (192.168.253.193): TTL Exceeded, ttl=253, 49 ms
    #4 p-c1.akbr1.global-gateway.net.nz (202.50.245.237): TTL Exceeded, ttl=251, 60 ms
    #5 g2-0-3.akbr2.global-gateway.net.nz (202.50.116.169): TTL Exceeded, ttl=251, 56 ms
    #6 p1-3.pabr2.global-gateway.net.nz (202.50.116.178): TTL Exceeded, ttl=250, 190 ms
    #7 g0-0-0-0.pabr3.global-gateway.net.nz (202.50.245.24): TTL Exceeded, ttl=249, 190 ms
    #8 sntcca2lce1.wcg.net (198.32.176.139): TTL Exceeded, ttl=249, 192 ms
    #9 sntcca2lce1-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.210.177): TTL Exceeded, ttl=248, 189 ms
    #10 snfcca1wcx2-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.199.73): TTL Exceeded, ttl=237, 253 ms
    #11 anhmca1wcx3-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.240.1): TTL Exceeded, ttl=238, 260 ms
    #12 anhmca1wcx2-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.143.77): TTL Exceeded, ttl=239, 249 ms
    #13 dllstx1wcx3-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.240.5): TTL Exceeded, ttl=240, 255 ms
    #14 drvlga1wcx1-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.240.22): TTL Exceeded, ttl=241, 254 ms
    #15 atlnga6lce1-pos2-0.wcg.net (64.200.127.82): TTL Exceeded, ttl=242, 255 ms
    #16 atlnga6lce1-cuttingedge-atm.wcg.net (64.200.126.70): TTL Exceeded, ttl=241, 252 ms
    #17 (66.205.208.100): TTL Exceeded, ttl=240, 255 ms
    #18 Unavailable (209.51.xxx.xxx): TTL Exceeded, ttl=239, 250 ms
    #19 xxx.xxx.com (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx): Echo Reply, ttl=238, 255 ms

    Statistics: Out 19, in 19, loss 0%, times (min/avg/max) 9/185/260 ms


    Pings are getting as low as 234ms ... never heard of before

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    34
    twrs - That's not a particularly helpful comment.

    You've got a great data centre with great support and two new links. The key word is "new" - instead of suggesting they turn one of them off, why not send specific information to the support guys that explains your problems.

    I have no doubt they'll get it sorted.

    Personally, I’d like to see a performance improvement to/from the UK. I don’t currently have any problems so I’m waiting to see how things settle down before sending trace routes. I wouldn’t, however, ever suggest they turn off a connection that’s been live for a matter of hours!

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Auckland - New Zealand
    Posts
    1,575
    xxx.xxx.xxxx.xxx.xxx (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) 0.307 ms 0.230 ms 0.141 ms
    2 e1-7.cr1.akl.win.co.nz (210.55.105.197) 0.302 ms 0.322 ms 0.264 ms
    3 fa0-0-0-1.br01.akl1.maxnet.net.nz (210.55.230.254) 66.303 ms 3.463 ms 2.776 ms
    4 202.ATM3-0.r4akl2.voyager.co.nz (203.110.31.77) 4.535 ms 21.889 ms 2.185 ms
    5 r0akl2.voyager.co.nz (203.21.24.87) 5.146 ms 3.691 ms 2.060 ms
    6 64.ATM2-0-0.GW2.SYD2.ALTER.NET (203.166.42.237) 29.201 ms 29.302 ms 30.511 ms
    7 422.at-6-0-0.XR1.SYD2.Alter.Net (210.80.3.93) 35.661 ms 34.099 ms 27.620 ms
    8 so-3-0-0.TR2.SYD2.Alter.Net (210.80.48.145) 27.118 ms 27.376 ms 30.950 ms
    9 0.so-5-0-0.IR2.SAC2.Alter.Net (210.80.49.61) 217.710 ms 192.032 ms 188.625 ms
    10 POS3-0.IR2.SAC1.ALTER.NET (137.39.31.210) 186.561 ms 203.279 ms POS3-0.IR1.SAC1.ALTER.NET (137.39.31.194) 204.914 ms
    11 0.so-0-0-0.TL1.SAC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.0.114) 187.956 ms 195.050 ms 189.784 ms
    12 0.so-7-0-0.XL1.SAC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.53.249) 208.772 ms 217.327 ms 216.948 ms
    13 POS6-0.BR6.SAC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.52.249) 196.648 ms 242.879 ms 198.283 ms
    14 p4-5-0-0.r00.plalca01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.9.97) 224.132 ms 219.748 ms 200.961 ms
    15 * * *
    16 * * *
    17 * * *
    18 p16-0-0-0.r00.atlnga03.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.2.49) 299.009 ms 279.156 ms 276.878 ms
    19 ge-0-0-0.a00.atlnga03.us.ra.verio.net (129.250.26.227) 278.371 ms 290.227 ms 284.671 ms
    20 ge-1-1.a02.atlnga03.us.ra.verio.net (129.250.26.229) 276.462 ms 290.572 ms 281.306 ms
    21 ge-3-3.a02.atlnga03.us.ce.verio.net (157.238.161.42) 251.409 ms 253.766 ms 253.550 ms
    22 * * *
    23 . (66.205.208.100) 256.262 ms 257.763 ms 253.142 ms
    24 209.51.xxx.xxx (209.51.xxx.xxx) 273.423 ms 293.277 ms 289.244 ms
    25 xxx.xxx.com (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) 284.971 ms 281.683 ms 280.460 ms

    Bring back wcg JK
    Last edited by StevenG; 10-23-2002 at 08:01 AM.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    924
    Still cogent for me.... although to get to Verio I'd have to go via Level3 as where as with cogent its direct
    Unlimited Space & Bandwidth
    http://localhost/
    Providing hosting since 17/99/3003

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    5,383
    Williams for me, and pings are down 30ms from cogent traces.
    Clustered Hosting With Continuous Data Protection (CDP)
    http://www.solidinternet.com
    8 Years of hosting excellence!

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    4,420

    how about now?

    everything is running very well now.

    how does it look for everyone?
    Dedicated Servers
    WWW.NETDEPOT.COM
    Since 2000

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,802

    Re: how about now?

    Originally posted by sailor
    everything is running very well now.

    how does it look for everyone?
    6 33 ms 21 ms 10 ms 34.atm4-1-0.dnvr-cust1.dnvr.uswest.net [63.225.2
    7.201]
    7 9 ms 7 ms 8 ms den-core-01.tamerica.net [205.171.16.37]
    8 8 ms 6 ms 6 ms den-core-03.tamerica.net [205.171.16.14]
    9 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms p4-2.dnvtco1-cr4.bbnplanet.net [4.25.27.77]
    10 23 ms 15 ms 8 ms so-2-2-0.dnvtco1-br2.bbnplanet.net [4.24.11.45]

    11 15 ms 10 ms 6 ms so-7-0-0.dnvtco1-br1.bbnplanet.net [4.24.11.37]

    12 56 ms 31 ms 30 ms p8-0.crtntx1-br1.bbnplanet.net [4.24.5.133]
    13 31 ms 32 ms 32 ms p15-0.crtntx1-br2.bbnplanet.net [4.24.10.114]
    14 28 ms 27 ms 28 ms p2-0.crtntx1-cr12.bbnplanet.net [4.24.9.254]
    15 268 ms 264 ms 262 ms mae-dallas-atm-gtei.netrail.net [4.24.147.10]
    16 266 ms 261 ms 279 ms g3-9.core02.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.31.8
    9]
    17 261 ms 264 ms 264 ms p15-0.core01.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.2
    5]
    18 285 ms 349 ms 265 ms p13-0.core01.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.9
    8]
    19 306 ms 293 ms 291 ms p15-0.core01.tpa01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.4
    6]
    20 325 ms 302 ms 308 ms p5-0.core01.mco01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.14
    1]
    21 286 ms 303 ms 293 ms p14-0.core01.jax01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.1
    54]
    22 299 ms 295 ms 286 ms p5-0.core01.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.13
    8]
    23 72 ms 67 ms 70 ms g50.ba01.b000173-0.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.
    28.5.246]
    24 79 ms 78 ms 76 ms dv2.demarc.cogentco.com [66.28.28.254]
    25 78 ms 74 ms 80 ms dv2-atl-core-core-a.dv2.net [209.51.131.1]
    26 78 ms 79 ms 95 ms 209.51.157.228

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    924
    tracert dv2.com

    Tracing route to dv2.com [209.51.157.228]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    9 282 ms 250 ms 237 ms CogentTestPeering.atdn.net [66.185.141.242]
    10 262 ms 250 ms 241 ms p13-0.core01.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.250.7.
    21]
    11 253 ms 248 ms 240 ms p15-0.core02.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.2
    2]
    12 273 ms 230 ms 248 ms p14-0.core01.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.1
    25]
    13 283 ms 250 ms 237 ms g49.ba01.b000173-0.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.
    28.5.242]
    14 272 ms 253 ms 257 ms dv2.demarc.cogentco.com [66.28.28.254]
    15 274 ms 257 ms 251 ms dv2-atl-core-core-a.dv2.net [209.51.131.1]
    16 276 ms 266 ms 246 ms 209.51.157.228

    Trace complete.
    Remember I'm using a 56k on AOL uk, very good ping times... Now if Verio could install a line into AOLnetwork it would be better (to get to Verio it goes via Level3).
    Unlimited Space & Bandwidth
    http://localhost/
    Providing hosting since 17/99/3003

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    4,420
    far east - average 180
    austrailia average 250
    europe average 150
    EU countries 115
    west coast us 80
    east coast us 65
    some from dc/ny/ dallas where there are good peering points are returning 25-30 ms times. WOW!!

    these are the averages I have come up with after extensive traces from all over the world.


    I am happy
    Dedicated Servers
    WWW.NETDEPOT.COM
    Since 2000

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •