Results 26 to 50 of 54
-
10-02-2002, 02:37 AM #26Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- Dallas, TX
- Posts
- 205
With pings like that I think it's unlikely he'll see much packet loss using any number.
justin 'at' abrogo.com
http://www.abrogo.com
Shared Unix Hosting
-
10-02-2002, 03:27 PM #27Newbie
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- MN
- Posts
- 27
This is what I love about WebReseller, they do try their best to resolve issues.
Though, this is out of their hands, I'm sure all of you understand how fustrating it is, especially if you run a game server company with 3/4 AT&TBroadband customers.
p.s. make sure you check out the new WebReseller.net website, it's hotRoss Sherman
ENVISION7.com
-
10-02-2002, 06:00 PM #28Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Posts
- 234
It seems like pings are starting to spike again tonight... Another harsh night, wonder how many clients i'll loose today...
-
10-02-2002, 08:14 PM #29Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Posts
- 521
ATT = crap
I've been having ping issues on the west coast on my UnitedColo boxes with ATT and Internap. Even though many of us on the west coast use Time Warner Cable rather than ATT Broadband Internet, our packets are still being routed through ATT. Pings have been crap for the past few days, with 200ms pings when it's normally 19ms due to ATT. UnitedColo was informed and I assume they informed Internap because the pings are better for some, but still crap for many others.
-
10-02-2002, 10:04 PM #30Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Westbury, LI NY
- Posts
- 1,705
Originally posted by SynHost
It seems like pings are starting to spike again tonight... Another harsh night, wonder how many clients i'll loose today...
My ISP + level3 = fine
ATT + level3 = bad
Seems like someone doesnt like ATT and since webreseller doesnt have any agreements with sprint, they really cant be held accountable.
(And I checked packetloss as well (400) and no, I am not losing any packets)
-
10-03-2002, 03:41 AM #31Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2001
- Posts
- 960
Well, I guess it's time for Webreseller to add another lines and get multihomed with BGP so if the ATT+Level3 route's slow, it can take the other faster route and the problem should never or rarely happen again in the future. So is everyone here agree???
-
10-03-2002, 09:36 AM #32Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 852
no absoutely they should not go with bgp because it will slow down their network. Also bgp doesnt kick in unless a line goes down, am i wrong?
I have several servers there and i have never seen a network issue or performance issue.
-
10-03-2002, 09:44 AM #33Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- Vienna, Austria
- Posts
- 1,074
usually yipes or level3 support are pretty good at resolving problems such as that. i had 2 experiences kind of like that with yipes and 3 with level3 in the past and i just emailed directly to support@yipes or support@level3 with my traceroutes showing the problems. they responded everytime within a day and it was usually cleared up in 1 - 3 days.
-
10-03-2002, 11:05 AM #34Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- Silver Spring, Maryland
- Posts
- 256
Looks like it's fixed
-
10-03-2002, 12:36 PM #35Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Posts
- 848
no absoutely they should not go with bgp because it will slow down their networkDedicated Servers at Steadfast Networks and Softlayer : Virutal Hosting at FutureQuest : VPS at FutureHosting
-
10-03-2002, 04:09 PM #36Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 1,262
Originally posted by panopticon
can someone expand on this? how bgp/multihoming could/would slow down their network?
and if one went down it would pickup so there would be more redundancy and faster speeds i wish they would
-
10-03-2002, 04:45 PM #37Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Posts
- 234
goodness, I think we've already established that this is out of webreseller's control.. So in that case I've never had a network issue with webreseller either. We are just hoping because Level3 is their direct provider, they can help speed the process of getting it fixed.
-
10-03-2002, 06:30 PM #38Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- Silver Spring, Maryland
- Posts
- 256
SynHost, their "direct provider" is Yipes.
-
10-03-2002, 07:02 PM #39Eternal Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- Chicago
- Posts
- 1,249
BGP4 does not make anything faster.
Actually in most cases it will slow things down.---------------------
"In the end you start thinking about the beginning"
"You shouldn't take life to seriously, you will never get out alive"
"Every Passing Minute is another chance to turn it all around"
-
10-03-2002, 09:02 PM #40Disabled
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 248
NO1,
Yipes is not truly a provider... Level 3, Genuity, and a third (coming soon) are the providers, Yipes only provides the ring and the guarantees to us..
-
10-04-2002, 06:15 AM #41Newbie
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- MN
- Posts
- 27
Still slow :(
no1v2,
The problem is not fixed yet, it still is very spiky, and high pings from 2pm-*. These problems do resolve themselves at night, and go away for around an hour, then they are back again.
Though, in the morning, I will ping a constant 50.Ross Sherman
ENVISION7.com
-
10-04-2002, 07:04 AM #42Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 1,262
i would'nt know but it sounds like an overloaded somthing or another for level3 or att
-
10-04-2002, 10:55 AM #43Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 852
Originally posted by JBIZ718
BGP4 does not make anything faster.
Actually in most cases it will slow things down.
Finally someone backed me up.
-
10-04-2002, 11:22 AM #44Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Posts
- 522
Would you rather have a blazing fast network that's not multihomed, or a slightly slower network that has true back up?
I'm curious as to what customers want as well. As an end user I would rather have a network with consistent 75ms pings over a network that has 40ms pings MOST of the time.Lowest priced electronics and game systems on the web. PS3, Wii, Xbox 360, iPhone, and more.
Contact freegamesystem@yahoo.com for details.
-
10-05-2002, 03:33 PM #45Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- Silver Spring, Maryland
- Posts
- 256
Sorry, by provider I meant that you buy from Yipes (Right? Or am I wrong about that too? )
7out, you might want to go with actual examples instead of theoretical hosts. In my experience, WebReseller's network stability has been much better than every single one of the multi-homed hosts with comparable prices I've heard about, and almost or just as good as most of the much more expensive ones. I know I sound like a WebReseller fanatic here, but I hate to see one of my hosts unfairly put down.
Besides, who offers a speed/price/reliability ratio comparable to Yipes? Maybe someone does, but I can't think of them...help me out if you know anyone though I rent servers from WebReseller because of their great speed/price/reliability ratio, and I'll be very suprised if Yipes doesn't play a big part in that (again, correct me if I'm wrong).
Don't get me wrong, WebReseller isn't perfect. I've had some "bumps" them, but their value is great. (One of those bumps was partially my fault too).Last edited by no1v2; 10-05-2002 at 03:49 PM.
-
10-05-2002, 03:42 PM #46Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2001
- Location
- St. Louis, MO
- Posts
- 2,508
BGP4 does not make anything faster. Actually in most cases it will slow things down.Mike @ Xiolink.com
http://www.xiolink.com 1-877-4-XIOLINK
Advanced Managed Microsoft Hosting
"Your data... always within reach"
-
10-05-2002, 04:54 PM #47Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Posts
- 37
Originally posted by goodness0001
no absoutely they should not go with bgp because it will slow down their network. Also bgp doesnt kick in unless a line goes down, am i wrong?
Grant (BGP engineer)
-
10-05-2002, 04:56 PM #48Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Posts
- 1,593
Care to elaborate a bit, Grant?
Peter
-
10-05-2002, 04:59 PM #49Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Posts
- 37
Originally posted by zdwebhosting
it does'nt slow it down it makes it faster in most cases since it takes the quickest route or the one with least asn's or whatever so therefore instead of taking a path all around the us then back to you it may take 3 hops you see?
This is Cisco-only, but since that's the majority of routers out there, you can read all about Cisco's BGP best-path decision-making process here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk64...80094431.shtml
Grant
-
10-05-2002, 05:03 PM #50Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Posts
- 37
Originally posted by ckpeter
Care to elaborate a bit, Grant?
Peter
A router has a BGP4 session active with neighbors (peers/providers that you are connected with). The router uses a certain pre-set algorithm to determine the best path, taking into account manually-set metrics (such as AS-path prepending, MEDs, weights, and local-prefs). When a neighbor's session dies (ie; the circuit stops passing traffic) the router removes that neighbor's routes from it's list of available routes, re-calculating the best path using aforementioned path selection criteria.
Grant