hosted by liquidweb


Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : Specialty Hosting and Markets : Game Servers : Best Processor For Running CS 1.6 GameServers?
Reply

Forum Jump

Best Processor For Running CS 1.6 GameServers?

Reply Post New Thread In Game Servers Subscription
 
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-01-2009, 11:21 PM
7773737 7773737 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 101
Hi, i talked to a guy who owns a GSP on msn and he told me that xeons werent good for CS 1.6 server hosting and thats why he removed all his offered dedicated servers that had xeon chips and now he only offers C2Q 9300. Is C2Q 9300 really better than 5430? According to benchmark results, 9300 is close to Xeon 5430 2.66 ghz. Would getting two 9300 servers 4-8 gb of ram each at an average of $175 each better than getting Dual Quad Core Xeon 5430 with 8 gb of ram?
Whats your opinion?
Xeons or C2Q for Game servers?
Also, i would probably be getting more total bandwidth, hd and ram with the C2Q 9300s



Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:00 AM
Creed3020 Creed3020 is offline
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 260
Interesting question and I am glad you brought it to WHT.
It has been awhile since I've hosted many CS1.6 servers as the majority are CSS now, but your arguments sakes CSS is more a showstopper than CS1.6 so it still works out experience wise. My first question is: At what tickrate and FPS will these servers be running at? I think that will have a greater impact on my suggestion that anything else.
The Xeon based system will cost more overall but I am pretty sure the CPUs will outperform the Core2Quads, the reason being:
-The E5430 is a server based processor and its equivalent desktop CPU, the Q9450, is not the CPU you would be receiving if you went the two server route
-The E5430 has double the L2 Cache as the Q9300 (12MB per CPU for the E5430 vs. 6MB per CPU for the Q9300)
-The E5430 operates at a slightly faster clock speed. Gong with the Dual Xeon setup would leave you with 1.328GHz more overall speed spread across your 8 cores.
Passmark Benchmarks:
E5430 Dual CPU - 7,684
Q9300 - 3,348 (3,348*2= 6,696)
(Source: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html)
I currently have a Q9400 based server and it does not seem to handle the same way an older server I used to have when it comes to CS and CSS game servers. The old server was a X3220 (2.4GHz 4MB L2 Cache, 1066FSB)
The benefits of having two servers is that you can balance the load over a greater number of physical machines, better redundancy (as in not all your eggs are in one basket), more HDD space, and more bandwidth.

Reply

Related posts from TheWhir.com
Title Type Date Posted
Web Hosting Sales and Promos Roundup - February 14, 2014 Web Hosting News 2014-02-14 16:26:38
actmedia Listing 2014-04-23 02:32:25
Web Hosting Sales and Promos Roundup -- January 18, 2013 Web Hosting News 2013-01-18 16:54:55
Web Host Hivelocity Adds Intel Ivy Bridge, E5 and E7 Servers Web Hosting News 2012-06-04 14:58:06
Web Host Connectria Launches IBM AIX Cloud Hosting Web Hosting News 2012-05-03 13:56:33


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Login:
Log in with your username and password
Username:
Password:



Forgot Password?
Advertisement:
Web Hosting News:



 

X

Welcome to WebHostingTalk.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

WebHostingTalk.com is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?