Results 1 to 22 of 22
-
09-06-2002, 01:58 PM #1Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 2,014
Please can some people from around the world test the speed of my site?
www.sdsym.com
I'm on Nocster [ www.nocster.net ] and it seems to be running a bit slow recently, like response times seem to be a bit slow, I don't know how to test it out.
I'd appreciate it if people find out some details/test it from around the world, thanks
-
09-06-2002, 02:11 PM #2Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Posts
- 57
from europe:
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=1016ms TTL=239
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=1154ms TTL=239
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=1029ms TTL=239
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=961ms TTL=239
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 961ms, Maximum = 1154ms, Average = 1040ms
-
09-06-2002, 02:12 PM #3WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 106
from Asia
Pinging 64.191.3.99 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=242
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=242
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=242
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=242
Ping statistics for 64.191.3.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 270ms, Maximum = 271ms, Average = 270msRyanMandrake
-
09-06-2002, 02:24 PM #4Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Posts
- 180
Europe:
Pinging sdsym.com [64.191.3.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=238
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=238
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=238
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=238
Ping statistics for 64.191.3.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 94ms, Maximum = 99ms, Average = 95ms
-
09-06-2002, 02:28 PM #5Disabled
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 221
From Dallas, TX:
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=246
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=246
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=246
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=246
From Edinburgh, UK:
PING sdsym.com (64.191.3.99) from x.x.x.x : 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 64.191.3.99: icmp_seq=0 ttl=238 time=112.812 msec
64 bytes from 64.191.3.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=238 time=114.815 msec
64 bytes from 64.191.3.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=238 time=113.781 msec
64 bytes from 64.191.3.99: icmp_seq=3 ttl=238 time=151.912 msec
-
09-06-2002, 02:32 PM #6Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Sep 2000
- Location
- New Jersey, U.S.A.
- Posts
- 354
09/06/02 14:54:41 ping sdsym.com
Ping sdsym.com (64.191.3.99) ...
1 Addr:64.191.3.99, RTT: 71ms, TTL: 249
2 Addr:64.191.3.99, RTT: 71ms, TTL: 249
3 Addr:64.191.3.99, RTT: 72ms, TTL: 249
4 Addr:64.191.3.99, RTT: 74ms, TTL: 249
5 Addr:64.191.3.99, RTT: 71ms, TTL: 249
6 Addr:64.191.3.99, RTT: 72ms, TTL: 249
7 Addr:64.191.3.99, RTT: 71ms, TTL: 249
8 Addr:64.191.3.99, RTT: 72ms, TTL: 249
9 Addr:64.191.3.99, RTT: 70ms, TTL: 249
10 Addr:64.191.3.99, RTT: 71ms, TTL: 249
1 65.173.80.1 48ms 47ms 47ms TTL: 0 (user1.XXXX.nj.sprint-hsd.net ok)
2 207.14.188.2 47ms 48ms 49ms TTL: 0 (user2.XXXX.nj.sprint-hsd.net ok)
3 144.228.181.41 56ms 52ms 53ms TTL: 0 (sl-gw16-pen-10-0.sprintlink.net ok)
4 144.232.5.93 53ms 52ms 52ms TTL: 0 (sl-bb25-pen-0-0.sprintlink.net ok)
5 144.232.5.6 52ms 52ms 52ms TTL: 0 (sl-gw1-pen-10-0.sprintlink.net ok)
6 144.228.171.178 70ms 68ms 70ms TTL: 0 (sl-hostnoc-1-0.sprintlink.net ok)
7 64.191.3.99 74ms 71ms 71ms TTL:249 (sdsym.com ok)Last edited by RotoHost; 09-06-2002 at 02:38 PM.
Jim
RotoHOST.com
webhosting solutions for e-Business
-
09-06-2002, 02:43 PM #7Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- Clifton Park, NY
- Posts
- 925
Im getting about 75% packet loss to it right now.
-Brendan
-
09-06-2002, 02:56 PM #8Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Posts
- 2,120
64 bytes from 64.191.3.99: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=130.999 msec
64 bytes from 64.191.3.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=241 time=131.643 msec
64 bytes from 64.191.3.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=241 time=132.889 msec
--- sdsym.com ping statistics ---
15 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 73% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 129.960/131.372/132.889/1.150 ms
very bad.,....
-
09-06-2002, 03:03 PM #9Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 2,014
So are all the stats bad? I guess it would make sense for the slow loading times?
<?php include_once('signature'); ?>
-
09-11-2002, 03:32 PM #10Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 2,014
Bump, I'm getting these slow loading times again !
What should I say to my host when I Email them?<?php include_once('signature'); ?>
-
09-11-2002, 03:42 PM #11Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Posts
- 176
Ask for Traceroutes - not for Pings. Show your host the traceroutes, they can see the problem that way. Chances are its in one of their upstream providers and you will get a response like this:
"Thanks for your message. We are aware of the problem and are fixing it."
And hopefully, if you are lucky:
"We expect the problem to fixed within xx hours."Last edited by refcom; 09-11-2002 at 03:56 PM.
Travis Doherty
Web Hosting Services
http://www.referable.com/
-
09-11-2002, 03:44 PM #12Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Posts
- 176
BTW - Here is my Traceroute and some pings for reference:
(Hop 1 and 2 deleted so I don't promote myself.)
3 ge6-0-core1.nyc1.globix.net (209.10.1.129) 1.054 ms 1.085 ms 1.093 ms
4 ge4-0-peer3.nyc1.globix.net (209.10.12.114) 1.098 ms 1.124 ms 4.435 ms
5 POS2-2.GW12.NYC4.ALTER.NET (157.130.22.237) 1.435 ms 6.996 ms 8.438 ms
6 505.at-6-1-0.XR4.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.22.78) 1.053 ms 1.414 ms 1.265 ms
7 0.so-4-0-0.TL1.NYC9.ALTER.NET (152.63.0.173) 2.339 ms 3.259 ms 1.444 ms
8 0.so-6-0-0.TL1.DCA8.ALTER.NET (152.63.3.198) 5.054 ms 7.612 ms 6.939 ms
9 0.so-5-0-0.XL1.DCA8.ALTER.NET (152.63.25.38) 6.380 ms 7.711 ms 6.330 ms
10 289.at-6-1-0.XR1.TCO1.ALTER.NET (152.63.39.246) 9.786 ms 7.810 ms 8.112 ms
11 193.ATM5-0.GW8.PHL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.39.201) 9.653 ms 12.863 ms 11.722 ms
12 * * *
13 64.191.3.99 (64.191.3.99) 14.198 ms 5.686 ms 14.068 ms
--- sdsym.com ping statistics ---
43 packets transmitted, 43 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 9.711/14.685/51.930/6.229 ms
That's not bad if you ask me - but I could be taking a different route than you are to the servers.Travis Doherty
Web Hosting Services
http://www.referable.com/
-
09-11-2002, 04:03 PM #13Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 2,014
Well my site's currently down, I emailed my host...
<?php include_once('signature'); ?>
-
09-11-2002, 04:05 PM #14Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- South Dakota
- Posts
- 59
looks okay
Last edited by RichTek; 09-11-2002 at 04:31 PM.
Rich D.
EBS
-
09-11-2002, 04:34 PM #15Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 852
Loads good for me
-
09-11-2002, 04:36 PM #16Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Posts
- 3,729
From Singapore:
Pinging sdsym.com [64.191.3.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=392ms TTL=234
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=391ms TTL=234
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=391ms TTL=234
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=391ms TTL=234
Ping statistics for 64.191.3.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 391ms, Maximum = 392ms, Average = 391ms• Have • you • Floble'd • today? •
-
09-11-2002, 04:43 PM #17Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Posts
- 383
Pinging sdsym.com [64.191.3.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=240
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=240
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=240
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=240
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=240
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=240
Ping Statistic :
Packet Sent = 6
Packet Received = 6
Lost = 0 <0% loss>
Approximate round trip times
in milli-seconds :
Minimum = 31
Maximum = 46
Average = 34www.rackfive.com
Aquired by Data Provider LLC.
-
09-11-2002, 04:48 PM #18Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Posts
- 176
N9ne:
Do yourself a favour and set yourself up with some monitoring services. I won't list any here, they are easy enough to find online. You should be able to find a decent free one that checks every few hours and reports downtime.
Make sure you find one that checks from multiple locations.
This will help you to establish trust in your hosting company, you will know that when things do go wrong they will fix them. If you can't start to trust them based on watching their average downtime frequency and the average window length, use the same process to monitor other hosts and decide which one you would like to transfer too (and of course your normal process of checking support, etc..)Travis Doherty
Web Hosting Services
http://www.referable.com/
-
09-11-2002, 07:50 PM #19Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- perl -le '$_=`man perlfaq1`;print/"(j.*)"/'
- Posts
- 280
AlterNet hasn't exactly been "OK" in the past 2 years. If Nocster is relying solely on their AlterNet cage, I feel sorry for them.
100mbps from CommuniTech, MO, U.S.:
12 64.191.3.99 (64.191.3.99) 45.144 ms 44.738 ms 44.797 ms
100mbps from Cogent, TX, U.S.:
15 64.191.3.99 (64.191.3.99) 50.875 ms 50.516 ms 50.128 ms
I expected Cogent to do better.Richard Ward
1 NET LANE, LLC.
http://www.1NL.net
The low cost data center.
-
09-11-2002, 07:55 PM #20Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- The Netherlands
- Posts
- 393
From the Netherlands - Amsterdam:
Pinging 64.191.3.99 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=241
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=241
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=241
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=241
Ping statistics for 64.191.3.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 95ms, Maximum = 107ms, Average = 98ms
Looks good to meAlexander
-
09-11-2002, 07:57 PM #21Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- England, UK
- Posts
- 734
From the UK
Pinging sdsym.com [64.191.3.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=242
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=242
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=242
Reply from 64.191.3.99: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=242
Ping statistics for 64.191.3.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 107ms, Maximum = 109ms, Average = 107ms
-
09-11-2002, 09:04 PM #22Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 83
You can use www.traceroute.org for selfserve pings from around the world.