
09-03-2008, 12:38 PM
|
|
|
Interesting article, thanks.
|

09-03-2008, 01:08 PM
|
|
|
22% downtime is very excessive, even in the worst conditions. I would have to call that blatant negligence. For the price they were paying, they should expect great service, to say the least.
|

09-03-2008, 01:19 PM
|
|
View Beta Profile
THE Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,687
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan Kinney
22% downtime is very excessive, even in the worst conditions. I would have to call that blatant negligence. For the price they were paying, they should expect great service, to say the least.
|
Though the downtime was largely caused by a disk failure:
Rahman told El Reg today that the worst problems occurred between October 2007 and January 2008 when a repeated hard disk failure caused periods of up to 72 hours offline for some of UK Mobile Media's clients. "It was something you would ordinarily expect to take 15 minutes to replace... we lost significant custom through it," he said.
It then depends on what exactly happened. How much of that 72 hours was waiting on the customer for a response? Where they doing a full drive copy for them as well/working to recover the data? If so, that would take much more than 15 minutes and I could see with certain issues it taking 72 hours.
|

09-03-2008, 01:38 PM
|
|
View Beta Profile
WHT Addict
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 159
|
|
I'm sure there's more to the story, but unfortunately the hosting company failed to comment on the issue when given the chance by The Register. 
|

09-03-2008, 02:04 PM
|
|
View Beta Profile
Currently in Beta
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 1,756
|
|
its hardly a huge shock that fasthosts have had problems, especially now they have been bought and are just another brand.
__________________
♣ udedi.com - UK unmetered server, VPS & CDN specialists
♣ 10,000gb.com - High bandwidth US servers comming soon!
|

09-03-2008, 04:10 PM
|
|
|
Fasthosts aka 1and1
says it all really
|

09-03-2008, 09:54 PM
|
|
|
Wow had no idea you could get into legal trouble for being a crappy host. Guess someone has to police the quality of services out there. 
|

09-03-2008, 11:50 PM
|
|
|
if the legal jurisdiction of the user and the company are the same, certainly you could file a lawsuit in small claims, and if the company doesn't show up, they're going to lose. seems like that was the case here.
__________________
===================
Vtunnel.com will get you past blocks at work or school, evading ip and url filters.
====================
|

09-04-2008, 12:27 PM
|
|
|
22% downtime wow thats pretty bad even if there is only a dew instances like this that is still unacceptable for that price or any price for that matter
|

09-04-2008, 01:27 PM
|
|
|
*gulp* One of my servers is with Fasthosts :-O That news article doesn't make me feel too good, I should probably search for a new provider...
|

09-04-2008, 05:03 PM
|
|
|
Haha yeah I probably would, or at least have a backup plan so you can instantly switch to a new provider the instant your server goes down. Kinda like a disk/array failure disaster plan.
|

09-04-2008, 05:57 PM
|
|
View Beta Profile
Randy
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ashburn VA, San Diego CA
Posts: 1,890
|
|
Some companies should be slapped for not properly researching companies they do business with...
__________________
Managed Hosting
San Diego CA and Ashburn VA Dedicated Servers and Colocation since 2003
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
| Postbit Selector |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|