Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 43 of 43

Thread: Is burst slow?

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    924
    No problems here ... I go over AT&T
    Unlimited Space & Bandwidth
    http://localhost/
    Providing hosting since 17/99/3003

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Kalamazoo
    Posts
    33,412
    Originally posted by sup?
    . . . . .
    Apparently some good techs have left...is Burst hiring replacements?. . . . . . .
    I'm sorry that you feel that this equates to being a poorly run company. This is something that, IMHO, should be taken up with the company directly.
    My advice to you is; have nothing to do with a company if they do not meet your needs.
    There is no best host. There is only the host that's best for you.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Kalamazoo
    Posts
    33,412
    Originally posted by Get-Hosted.com
    . . . . . . BTW SWR: your getmehosted.com/compare.html took about 2 full minutes to load for me, including some images that just didn't load at all. Also, I pinged your site at over 2000ms average. Is that hosted with Burst?
    Thank you. Could you send a traceroute please?

    That site is hosted at Nocster.
    There is no best host. There is only the host that's best for you.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Downunder..
    Posts
    2,612
    getmehosted.com loads fine for me:

    18 64.191.4.194 (64.191.4.194) 239.897 ms 239.655 ms 413.841 ms


    Don't forget i'm from AU, so thats pretty good latency.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    574
    13 501 ms 500 ms 401 ms 64.191.4.194

    17 64.191.4.194 (64.191.4.194) 116.332 ms 1407.099 ms 444.196 ms

    Two different traceroutes from different networks.

    It's obvious there's an issue at the last hop, everything before it is fine.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Downunder..
    Posts
    2,612
    1 gip-oakh-us-bar-1-fe0-0-0.gip.net (204.59.152.205) 2.15 ms 1.947 ms 1.726 ms
    2 S2-0-0.WASAR1.Washington.opentransit.net (193.251.250.37) 2.979 ms 2.828 ms 2.931 ms
    3 H3-0-0.PENAR3.Pennsauken.opentransit.net (193.251.250.249) 6.241 ms 5.668 ms 6.064 ms
    4 Sr4-0.PENBB1.Pennsauken.opentransit.net (193.251.132.244) 5.641 ms 5.573 ms 5.728 ms
    5 P5-1.NYKBB4.New-york.opentransit.net (193.251.154.121) 7.961 ms 8.154 ms 8.03 ms
    6 P11-0.NYKCR1.New-york.opentransit.net (193.251.241.30) 9.43 ms 9.166 ms 11.42 ms
    7 P5-0.NYKBB1.New-york.opentransit.net (193.251.241.21) 8.044 ms 8.959 ms 7.94 ms
    8 ATT.GW.opentransit.net (193.251.242.154) 9.506 ms 9.004 ms 8.411 ms
    9 tbr1-p014001.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.123.3.1) 14.885 ms 12.933 ms 13.46 ms
    10 gbr6-p30.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.11.14) 10.409 ms 8.671 ms 8.575 ms
    11 gar2-p370.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.123.1.205) 10.328 ms 8.347 ms 8.791 ms
    12 12.124.179.6 (12.124.179.6) 29.758 ms 16.164 ms 15.91 ms
    13 64.191.4.194 (64.191.4.194) 17.424 ms 16.594 ms 84.574 ms

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    95
    Originally posted by SoftWareRevue
    I'm sorry that you feel that this equates to being a poorly run company. This is something that, IMHO, should be taken up with the company directly.
    My advice to you is; have nothing to do with a company if they do not meet your needs.
    I anticipated the advice from the burst cheerleader and addressed it prior so let's all remember that.

    As to addressing them directly, I have mentioned two issues where addressing them directly came out with poor results so I'm mentioning it here where so many others have the same issues.

    Another reason to post here publicly is that I'm with them because of this place..so if they got their business here..they may as well address the clients they got here...only fair...

    P.S.
    Feel free to add some more fuel to the fire...but you fool no one. We all know you have vested interest and no one takes your comments very seriously.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    95
    Burst Down Again.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    567
    yes's Burst down again

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    84
    It seems so.
    http://www.avalancheonline.net

  11. #36
    Burst is down for everyone .

    Please see this thread

    http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showth...threadid=74149
    phantasyworkshosting.com

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    95
    Originally posted by SoftWareRevue
    We are not experiencing any problems. Nor do we have any complaints. We are completely satisfied and highly recommend Burst/Nocster for value and service.
    Thanks for your recommendation...are you up while we are all down? Or downtime just doesn't bother you?? Do you actually have a website? Do any people depend on your service? Do you have to answer to anyone while your site is down? Are they as happy with you as you are with Burst? Just curious.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Kalamazoo
    Posts
    33,412
    Do you actually post anything other than Burst Bashing?
    There is no best host. There is only the host that's best for you.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    95
    Nice comeback...I guess that was the only thing you could say....

    This place is called webhosting Talk Forums. I don't come here to chat about voting for Deb.

    I first came here to find a host. People like you with dubious testimonials made me sign up with the wrong people and I only come back here when my server is down to find out what is REALLY GOING ON w/ Burst because Burst won't tell the straight scoop. I have no other reason to be here.

    Any other comebacks?

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Kalamazoo
    Posts
    33,412
    Why not move, if you are unhappy?
    There is no best host. There is only the host that's best for you.

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    95
    I answered your question above (but you already knew that ) Also, you think you are helping Burst with your comments but pissing off pissed off customers doesn't help them

  17. #42
    Yes, we are talking about a DATA CENTER here, not a server. Data centers shouldn't go down more than the server. Burst.net is down 10 times for each one time my actual server is down.

    So once again I'm kicking myself in the ass for not scheduling 48 hours of straight work to get my sites off their unreliable network.

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Nevada, US
    Posts
    5,550
    See this thread for all updates:

    http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showt...&threadid=74149

    Sean R.
    BurstNET
    SmartHost™ - Intelligent Hosting! - Multiple Locations - US/EU! - Ultra-Fast NVME SSD VPS!
    http://www.smarthost.net - sales@smarthost.net - Resale/Affiliate Programs
    Cloud Hosting - VPS Hosting - Dedicated Servers - Colocation - Flux Capacitors

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •