Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2001

    What's best for a file server

    My Network is expanding to include a dedicated site to serve files, to do this I am prepeared to shell out on a new server just for serving files. But I am un-sure on what's more important when serving files (mainly .zip's). What would be best?

    1) 800Mhz CPU, 2GB RAM
    2) 1.8Ghz CPU, 512MB RAM
    3) Or just an all round meaty server?

    I don't have a great amount of money to spend so I need to maximise the amount of files this server can serve.
    [SIZE=1]Main Rig: Leadtek nForce2 Ultra Delux | [email protected] | 512MB Corsair XMS3200 | GeForce Ti4200 [email protected]/610 | 2*120GB WD SE HD
    Shuttle Rig: Shuttle SN41G2B Black | [email protected] | 512MB Samsung PC2700 | ATi Radeon 8500 64MB | 120GB Seagate Barracuda V HD
    Total Gamer Network Network Founder

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    An all round meaty server would be good on file serving just depends on how many your intending to serve. You would be best trying to serve files over ftp to instead of http and this will cut down on alot of problems and let you serve more files.
    When you handle the server right you can handle a huge amount of files on a small servers.

    Just my 2c

  3. #3
    get freebsd OS

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Well, I don't know what you'll need for CPU power, but especially in a fileserver, you'll really want to load it up with RAM. Linux "caches" things in RAM, so for at least some files, you'll never even have to read from the disk, resulting in major speed increases. I've always advocated stuffing boxes with lots of RAM. (By the way, I'm not sure about other operating systems -- I know that Linux caches things. I'd guess that FreeBSD does the same thing, though I haven't used it.)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts