Results 1 to 18 of 18
-
05-28-2008, 02:06 AM #1Mr. Awesome
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Posts
- 6,347
Frontpage replacement? What do you recommend for complete newbies?
Hello,
I used to recommend Microsoft frontpage for any customers that wanted to create their own simple website.
It was a decent tool that allowed them to create a basic website, etc...
What do you recommend now that Frontpage is no longer available? Are there any SIMPLE do-it-yourself website creators around?
Note - Simple is better. The customer is not interested to create a fancy website with "web 2.0" features or look and feel. This is just so they can create something basic themselves and put it up very simply on their website. So it is critical that the tool be SUPER EASY to set up and actually use. It should be designed for idiots.
(Free, if possible, is also better.)
Thanks!We are eNom PLATINUM PLUS resellers!
Sign up today for an eNom.com reseller account with lowest possible pricing.
* We provide support and service to over 4275 happy eNom domain name and SSL certificate resellers!
-
05-31-2008, 06:04 PM #2Disabled
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Fiber Paradise
- Posts
- 56
Why not a free open source CMS, you can offer free installation and a couple of free templates.
-
06-01-2008, 10:05 PM #3Newbie
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 11
CMSs are a good option. Or if you'd prefer a desktop app Dreamweaver's good.
-
06-02-2008, 06:56 AM #4Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Internet
- Posts
- 457
Publisher os good. Webexpression 2008 is also good.
www.xpindia.com hosting.
-
06-02-2008, 08:47 AM #5Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- New Zealand
- Posts
- 222
I used to be a Frontpage user with little web knowledge, moved to Dreamweaver and never looked back...
-
06-02-2008, 01:18 PM #6Newbie
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Posts
- 18
There are some free WYSIWYG(What You See Is What You get) editors like NVU that are fairly simple to use. I think most people would be able master it in fairly short time.
Dreamweaver is good, and probably overkill if you want to set up a quick site. It is also expensive unless you obtain it from less legal sources.The shortest answer is doing the thing.
-Ernest Hemingway
-
06-02-2008, 03:09 PM #7Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- Calgary, Alberta
- Posts
- 531
I use Dreamweaver and Expression for quick and easy sites...
I prefer to code by hand is it keeps the site cleaner without inserting garbage into your code, also easier to categorize sections of the page so it's easier to edit if needed.
Cheers!
/bin/falseJason (JC) Morris, Vice President - Technology
TechWest Hosting - Enterprise Plesk & cPanel Hosting Since 2003!
Shared & Reseller Hosting on Dell Quad Core 5420 Servers w/ RAID 10 in Multiple Datacenters!
Ruby on Rails, FFMPEG, Fantastico, RVSiteBuilder, RVSkins, Nightly Off-site Backups, Clustered DNS!
-
06-03-2008, 03:30 PM #8Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 181
Yes, it's 100% free. Your own hand coded sites are the best. Using a program that generates the code for you is wrong, is coded horribly and teaches you NOTHING about actually writing the code. I suggest you go read up at www.w3schools.com and www.pixel2life.com. Also, while you're out reading those sites grab Notepad++, it's a lifesaver for hand coders.
-
06-03-2008, 04:21 PM #9Newbie
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Posts
- 18
I agree my preference is to hand code, and I use PSPad. W3schools.com is a fantastic reference. My experience with WYSIWYG editors is that they add unnecessary code.
The OP was asking for software that was simple, and inexpensive to create a basic website. Hand coding takes time to master. Some people just want to throw a site together, without having to learn CSS, HTML, or whatever. This was how I interpreted the original question.
As for Dreamweaver I don't see how you can recommend it. I've had beginners try my copy, and they found it overwhelming, and cumbersome. It also costs $300+. Dreamweaver is great if you need to control revisions, site management, and much more of the nuances.The shortest answer is doing the thing.
-Ernest Hemingway
-
06-03-2008, 05:11 PM #10
NVU gets my vote. I've had several clients that wanted something to replace FP, and they learned this one in a matter of an hour or so.
Why is it every time someone asks for a simple WYSIWYG web editor, someone has to start up with the hand edit vs automated argument? Is it so hard to give the OP what they asked for?
Your one stop shop for decentralization
-
06-03-2008, 05:53 PM #11Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- St. John's, NL
- Posts
- 2,201
Cpanel/WHM • PHP • Perl • Ruby • Full Time Support
LCWSoft - Canada web hosting (based in Newfoundland) since 2007
Servers based in the US and Canada (Uptime Report)
-
06-03-2008, 05:59 PM #12Mr. Awesome
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Posts
- 6,347
bear, I agree. My request was for a simple program for newbies to create a website.
Those people who recommended hand-coding, or a text editor may as well have not bothered to reply at all. Can you imagine giving your grandmother a copy of Dreamweaver and telling them to design a site? Good luck.
The NVU software looks pretty good. I am trying to find out if there are any read-made templates that can be used with it. If so, then it would be the *perfect* tool for newbie customers who just want to create a simple site and have never heard (nor care to know) about "HTML".We are eNom PLATINUM PLUS resellers!
Sign up today for an eNom.com reseller account with lowest possible pricing.
* We provide support and service to over 4275 happy eNom domain name and SSL certificate resellers!
-
06-03-2008, 08:06 PM #13Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 181
Clearly this is my opinion.
I just think if someone is going to spend time to make a website, why not use about an hour or two learning (X)HTML, I get tired of people just referring to HTML Hell, I picked up XHTML and CSS in a matter of hours just with the basics and just a couple of days to really master it. It's not as hard as people think and using a program like Nvu, Dreamweaver is just an excuse to not learn it, that is use the WYSIWYG part of the programs.
If you must give them a copy of a open-source (free) program, go with Nvu, <<snipped>>Last edited by bear; 06-03-2008 at 08:35 PM.
-
06-03-2008, 08:26 PM #14Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- St. John's, NL
- Posts
- 2,201
Cpanel/WHM • PHP • Perl • Ruby • Full Time Support
LCWSoft - Canada web hosting (based in Newfoundland) since 2007
Servers based in the US and Canada (Uptime Report)
-
06-03-2008, 08:38 PM #15
"An unofficial bugfix/update called "KompoZer"
More of a forked, fixed version?Your one stop shop for decentralization
-
06-04-2008, 12:01 AM #16Eternal Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2002
- Location
- Lakeport CA, Clear Lake
- Posts
- 1,856
I use Kompozer because it's the only thing I could find that's similar to Front Page but doesn't cost an arm and a leg but I hate it. It causes me more grief than you could imagine. For example, I have to do all kinds of extra work just to create a simple table that I could create in FP with no problems.
-
06-04-2008, 01:04 AM #17Always Learning...
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Bharat
- Posts
- 4,808
Also have a look at Aptana the free equivalent of Adobe Dreamweaver. Very powerful and very stable.
And for templates you can have a look at http://www.oswd.org http://www.openwebdesign.org http://www.opendesigns.org http://www.freecsstemplates.orgVinsar.Net - Quality Web Hosting at Economical Price on USA & European Servers
Offering domains, shared, reseller & VPS hosting.
Reliable Domain Reseller Account Resell Domains with Confidence
-
06-04-2008, 03:45 AM #18Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Scotland
- Posts
- 177
I'd vote for NVU too.
It might take only an hour or two to learn/create a basic (x)html page but it'll take several days if you want to learn how to add tables, layout your design and also - no beginner is going to want to do that.
GUI all the way for grandmothers/girlfriends/complete beginners!