hosted by liquidweb


Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : VPS Hosting : VPS with proactive monitoring
Reply

Forum Jump

VPS with proactive monitoring

Reply Post New Thread In VPS Hosting Subscription
 
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 3,117

VPS with proactive monitoring


Hello,

I'm currently gathering a list of all VPS providers that offer proactive VPS (services etc...) monitoring. So far I know that Wiredtree and Liquidweb include it and Zone.net and Futurehosting (to a limited extent) offers it as an add-on. Anyone else have any that they know of?



Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 371
Nnyan,

There are plenty of 'monitoring' services out there, which you can contract independent of the provider you choose.

Do you "have" to get your provider to monitor it?

  #3  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 3,117
I would prefer proactive monitoring done by the provider, one less entity I need to keep track of, but its not absolutely required.

Sponsored Links
  #4  
Old
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 371
Nnyan,

I would suggest getting your VPS and monitoring separate, it would be very bad if both were kept on the same DC and the VPS' network went down, and there goes your monitoring as well.

I found these 2 interesting.
http://www.siteuptime.com/
http://www.uptrends.com/ <- Looks nice but more expensive

Best of luck!

  #5  
Old
Aspiring Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 444
Hi,

What is your budget for this vps?

Thanks
Bobby

__________________
WebbyCart.com - Pushing Onwards
Server Management | Outsourced Hosting Support | Remote / Offsite Rsync Backup | Fully Managed Servers & Cloud VPS
sales@webbycart.com

  #6  
Old
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 322
There is a certain argument to be made for keeping them separate, although most providers are honest and won't alter the monitoring results to avoid SLA problems even if they could. If you go with your hosting provider's monitoring service, the most important thing is to make sure that they are monitoring from at least one, if not multiple, remote locations. Otherwise a power or network outage will take down the monitoring system as well and you won't get any notices of the outage.

It is more work to maintain independent services, but if you really want to ensure availability of your site, you should do this (not only for your hosting provider and monitoring service, but also DNS, backup hosting provider, etc.) Ultimately it comes down to how expensive an outage is - the more of an impact it has, the more you want to invest up front to ensure that you can handle them cleanly.

__________________
Panopta | Never Blinks
Advanced Server Monitoring and Outage Management Solutions

http://www.panopta.com | sales@panopta.com

  #7  
Old
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panopta View Post
There is a certain argument to be made for keeping them separate, although most providers are honest and won't alter the monitoring results to avoid SLA problems even if they could. If you go with your hosting provider's monitoring service, the most important thing is to make sure that they are monitoring from at least one, if not multiple, remote locations. Otherwise a power or network outage will take down the monitoring system as well and you won't get any notices of the outage.

It is more work to maintain independent services, but if you really want to ensure availability of your site, you should do this (not only for your hosting provider and monitoring service, but also DNS, backup hosting provider, etc.) Ultimately it comes down to how expensive an outage is - the more of an impact it has, the more you want to invest up front to ensure that you can handle them cleanly.
Agree completely.


  #8  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,751
I would recommend Liquidweb if you're looking for something like this since their monitoring is very reliable and extensive, and they do react very quickly.

__________________
Loading Deck - Turning sharp ideas into reality
Systems Management - Custom Development - Web Consultancy
100% UK-based and reachable by telephone

  #9  
Old
Aspiring Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Scranton, PA
Posts: 360
Hello, I think he wants the provider to monitor his server, and if a service is down, a tech would restart it and have a look to the issue. So far, the list he provided is correct.

Greetings.

__________________
Need Further Assistance ? Here you go !

  #10  
Old
Temporarily Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hanoi
Posts: 4,306
That can be done with a fully managed VPS. Do you have any preferred location?

  #11  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,361
I believe, he like me, wants the host to troubleshoot when the server is down. And the host should have a solid reputation.

At present, Liquid Web is under my radar.

  #12  
Old
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 263
I've been playing around with the za300 at zone.net (their monitoring) for free this month, it was a promotion they gave to existing customers. I haven't had any services go down so I'm not sure how the response time is, but if it's anything like their other tickets I'm assuming they'll answer it within a few minutes (emergency ticket). I'll probably drop it since I don't need monitoring (the server isn't really live/production yet), but for what it's worth it seems like a nice system. It's built into their existing billing panel. I like the fact that it's an add-on at zone and not included. I hate paying for things included in a package when I'm not using it.

  #13  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 3,117
Just to be clear, I'm not looking for uptime/ping remote monitoring. I'm looking for monitoring of key VPS processes (DNS, mail, FTP, etc...) and prefer the ability of auto-restarting/escalation if they don't come up/keep going down.

I really like the pro-active way Wiredtree does this and Zone.net's offering is really nice but just a bit costly if you want to monitor the same number of services offered by (for example) wiredtree. It's just really nice knowing that if any of these key services go down you don't have to wait until you notice it (or a customer), it's just taken care of it.

I'll be taking a look at Liquidweb soon but I'm also trying to find someone that offers this on the west coast.

Reply

Related posts from TheWhir.com
Title Type Date Posted
Codero Hosting Launches Proactive Managed Hosting Service Web Hosting News 2014-07-29 15:10:13
WiredTree Listing 2014-10-22 09:46:17
WiredTree Listing 2014-10-22 09:46:12
CA Technologies Launches Free Monitoring Tool Web Hosting News 2013-10-10 14:27:42
Data Center Provider Equinix Deploys ScienceLogic for Global Infrastructure Management Web Hosting News 2013-02-05 09:00:23


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Login:
Log in with your username and password
Username:
Password:



Forgot Password?
WHT Host Brief Email:

We respect your privacy. We will never sell, rent, or give away your address to any outside party, ever.

Advertisement:
Web Hosting News:
WHT Membership
WHT Membership



 

X

Welcome to WebHostingTalk.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

WebHostingTalk.com is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?