hosted by liquidweb


Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : Colocation and Data Centers : How good is Internap Bandwidth?
Reply

Colocation and Data Centers Find data centers, server hardware, bandwidth providers, and techniques for colocation purposes. Get advice on colocation web hosting, review providers and offer suggestions on choosing colocation hosting services and the right datacenter. If your service is unavailable, please click here.
Forum Jump

How good is Internap Bandwidth?

Reply Post New Thread In Colocation and Data Centers Subscription
 
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-24-2008, 06:46 PM
RackZen RackZen is offline
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 319

How good is Internap Bandwidth?


We are in the process of starting a new project for a client and we are trying to decide which network to place it on.

We have a choice of a Level3/Time Warner mix or pure Internap. Obviously the Internap bandwidth is a bit more expensive, but since this customers website serves an international community we are thinking that Internap bandwidth would be well worth the cost.

What are the advantages of using Internap? How is the network performance? We've setup a machine on the Internap network and have begun running tests, but I would like to hear from people who have direct experience with Internap bandwidth.

__________________
I post on WHT strictly for sig views

Reply With Quote


Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 03-24-2008, 06:48 PM
layer0 layer0 is offline
Performance Specialist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 10,341
Is this in Denver?

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-24-2008, 06:51 PM
RackZen RackZen is offline
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 319
Yes, it is in Denver.

__________________
I post on WHT strictly for sig views

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #4  
Old 03-25-2008, 02:44 PM
RackZen RackZen is offline
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 319
Anybody...?

__________________
I post on WHT strictly for sig views

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-25-2008, 05:26 PM
scooby2 scooby2 is offline
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 276
Advantages are you are "directly" connected to all the networks that they offer. Their routing helps to try and route the fastest way possible.

We moved from pure Level3/Broadwing to Internap here in Chicago and really love it. Their NOC has been top notch.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-25-2008, 05:54 PM
Apolo Apolo is offline
Community Liaison
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,597
If I'm given the option to have 2 connectivity providers instead of a single one, I'd choose the 2 providers. I believe multi-homed is always better than a single line, but that's just my opinion.

__________________
ComunidadHosting · The Largest Web Hosting Forum In Spanish!

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-25-2008, 05:57 PM
jhadley jhadley is offline
SSD Powered
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,726
Internap is about as good as it gets. That said, Time Warner and Level3 are two great providers - I think either option will be great, but perhaps Internap slightly better.

__________________
JHWC - Host / Sysadmin / Developer

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:02 PM
layer0 layer0 is offline
Performance Specialist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 10,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apolo View Post
If I'm given the option to have 2 connectivity providers instead of a single one, I'd choose the 2 providers. I believe multi-homed is always better than a single line, but that's just my opinion.
I don't necessarily consider multi-homing better than "single-homing" in the case of Internap - although it depends on each individual situation.

There was a long discussion about this in the past, and another member on this forum summed this up better than I could ever do so myself.

See their post here:

http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpo...5&postcount=37

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:02 PM
scooby2 scooby2 is offline
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apolo View Post
If I'm given the option to have 2 connectivity providers instead of a single one, I'd choose the 2 providers. I believe multi-homed is always better than a single line, but that's just my opinion.
Thats the thing. Internap is not just one provider. Here in Chicago they buy transit from seven providers. AT&T, MCI/UUnet/Verizon Business, Sprint, Level 3, NTT/Verio, Savvis and Global Crossing. Thats like having seven providers while only dealing with one.

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:15 PM
keywolf keywolf is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,078
You cant really get any better bandwidth than Internap, Its high quality and definetly worth the extra $$ per mbit. Level3 is also a good choice for bandwidth but nothing can beat internap for its speeds and low latency. Perhaps try mix Internap and Level3 that would work nicely im sure.

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:51 PM
RackZen RackZen is offline
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 319
Quote:
Originally Posted by layer0 View Post
I don't necessarily consider multi-homing better than "single-homing" in the case of Internap - although it depends on each individual situation.

There was a long discussion about this in the past, and another member on this forum summed this up better than I could ever do so myself.

See their post here:

http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpo...5&postcount=37
Thank you for that link, it was really useful. Our tests on the Internap network are performing greatly! Way better than our Level3/Time Warner mix. I am wondering if we should switch over everything to Internap. Their pricing isn't all that bad for as many providers as they purchase transit from.

__________________
I post on WHT strictly for sig views

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-25-2008, 07:18 PM
bummer6666 bummer6666 is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: chicago
Posts: 676
Quote:
Originally Posted by RackZen View Post
Thank you for that link, it was really useful. Our tests on the Internap network are performing greatly! Way better than our Level3/Time Warner mix. I am wondering if we should switch over everything to Internap. Their pricing isn't all that bad for as many providers as they purchase transit from.

We`ve had Internap for almost a year and our customers that are using it couldn`t be happier.
We`ve never had any network issues with them (hopefully I didn`t jinx myself :-)) and their sales and NOC team have been great as well.
We were trying to decide between getting Internap or multiple tier1 carriers last summer. We picked Internap because of their performance based routing opposed to BGP and also the fact we didn`t have to negotiate with several carriers and sign bunch of contracts (lowers your risk factors) was very helpful too

Feel free to use our LG site to test the performance of Internap and even compare it to our other carriers http://lg.fdcservers.net/

__________________
Petr Kral - FDCServers.net LLC
petr@fdcservers.net
Los Angeles - Seattle - Denver - Chicago - Miami- New York - Amsterdam - Prague - Zlin - Vienna - DATACENTERS

10/100/1000Mbps and 10Gbps UNMETERED SERVERS and COLOCATION in US and EU

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-25-2008, 08:27 PM
KarlZimmer KarlZimmer is offline
THE Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,542
There are many other Tier 2 networks and various data centers that can provide a roughly equivalent network product and can generally provide it at a lower price point. Some of these include Voxel, GNAX, etc.

__________________
Karl Zimmerman - Steadfast Networks: Dedicated Servers and Premium Colocation
karl @ steadfast.net - AIM: KarlAZimmerman - Sales/Support: 312-602-2689
2 Data Centers and 20,000+ sqft. in Chicago (350 E Cermak) + Manhattan Data Center
Cloud Hosting, Managed Dedicated Servers, Chicago Colocation, and New York Colocation

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-25-2008, 08:58 PM
bummer6666 bummer6666 is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: chicago
Posts: 676
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlZimmer View Post
There are many other Tier 2 networks and various data centers that can provide a roughly equivalent network product
that is true...you can also Yipes, WVFiber, XEEX, PCCW and many others.
However with Internap you get bandwidth that is much more marketable than the ones listed above and not every tier2 provide is able to provide performance based routing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlZimmer View Post
and can generally provide it at a lower price point. Some of these include Voxel, GNAX, etc.
I`d have to disagree on that but won`t comment because of NDA

__________________
Petr Kral - FDCServers.net LLC
petr@fdcservers.net
Los Angeles - Seattle - Denver - Chicago - Miami- New York - Amsterdam - Prague - Zlin - Vienna - DATACENTERS

10/100/1000Mbps and 10Gbps UNMETERED SERVERS and COLOCATION in US and EU

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-26-2008, 12:08 AM
layer0 layer0 is offline
Performance Specialist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 10,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlZimmer View Post
There are many other Tier 2 networks and various data centers that can provide a roughly equivalent network product and can generally provide it at a lower price point. Some of these include Voxel, GNAX, etc.
For the purposes of this thread, we are discussing the quality of Internap transit in Denver, CO; Voxel or GNAX doesn't apply there.

I'll refrain from sharing my opinion on whether either of these can stand up to Internap's product, as it depends on many factors (customer's target market, etc.). That said, I will say that Voxel has a very nice network. I simply cannot say they are better or worse than Internap as I don't have the data to back that up (not to mention that it'll vary).

Quote:
Originally Posted by RackZen View Post
Thank you for that link, it was really useful. Our tests on the Internap network are performing greatly! Way better than our Level3/Time Warner mix. I am wondering if we should switch over everything to Internap. Their pricing isn't all that bad for as many providers as they purchase transit from.
Go for it - I don't think you can go wrong.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Related posts from TheWhir.com
Title Type Date Posted
Internap Gives Colocation Customers Cloud-like Control with New Unified Portal Web Hosting News 2013-04-24 15:16:26
Internap Survey Finds Organizations Want Cloud-like Control in Colo Environments Web Hosting News 2013-02-14 09:34:25
Colocation Firm Internap Opens 55,000-Square-Foot Data Center in Texas Web Hosting News 2011-12-14 21:43:35
Colocation Firm Internap Expands Atlanta Data Center Web Hosting News 2011-07-27 17:02:55
Internap to Provide Data Center Services for AudienceScience at Frankfurt Site Web Hosting News 2011-07-13 20:39:05


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Login:
Log in with your username and password
Username:
Password:



Forgot Password?
Advertisement:
Web Hosting News:



 

X

Welcome to WebHostingTalk.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

WebHostingTalk.com is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?