Results 1 to 14 of 14
Thread: ASP.NET/SQL Server Hosting
-
01-30-2008, 03:10 PM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 3
ASP.NET/SQL Server Hosting
Hi,
I'm looking for opinions on what web hosts you all think I should consider. Technically, I need a host that supports:
1. ASP.NET 2.0
2. SQL Server 2005 (2000 may suffice if necessary)
I need to be able to host initially about 10 websites, but this figure could rise to 100 or eventually a 1000. Each website will needs it's own domain name (which will be purchased externally and pointed to the host), contain the same set of ASP.NET files but will need it's own database. The size of each application will be roughly 30Mb and I don't expect each database to grow to more than 50Mb. I will manage the customers files, so they do not need FTP access to their site.
I'm based in the UK, and so will all of my customers and their users. I don't expect each website to have much traffic (maybe 0-200 visitors a day).
If I had to list an order of what is important to me, I'd probably say:
1. Budget (ideally, this would be around 50-200GBP maximum per year)
2. Reliablility
3. Support
4. Speed
5. Bandwidth
If at all possible, I'd like an account that can "grow" with my business i.e. start off relatively inexpensive with a small number of clients yet allow me to add more and more domains/sites as I get more customers. If the price increases with this then fine, as long as it doesn't create more work to maintain the sites (i.e. I don't have to "move" sites or anything like that).
Are there any hosts that may be suitable based on all of the above, and that anyone would recommend?
Thanks,
Mark
-
01-30-2008, 03:40 PM #2Disabled
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- USA, EU, UK, CA, AUS
- Posts
- 1,804
Hello Mark,
It sounds like reseller plan would suit your needs. Did you require the hosting to be based in the UK?
Cheers,
Mark
-
01-30-2008, 03:44 PM #3New Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 3
Not necessarily, although I don't really understand the implications of it not being hosted in the UK if all my customers and their visitors will be from there. Would this affect performance or SE rankings?
-
01-30-2008, 03:47 PM #4Disabled
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- USA, EU, UK, CA, AUS
- Posts
- 1,804
It would be better if you can get hosting in the UK due to reduced latency, SEO considerations and locally based support.
-
01-30-2008, 04:30 PM #5New Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 3
OK, thanks for the info.
I'd be interested to hear if any UK based companies match my requirements then, but I am prepared to host outside the UK if necessary.
-
01-30-2008, 10:29 PM #6Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- USA, UK, Singapore
- Posts
- 3,481
You can either go for Reseller or Multiple domains hosting shared plans if you do not need the reseller features like private nameservers and individual control panel for each of the domains.
Did you checked the offers section? I'm sure you'll find the right host suiting your needs.
Shared Hosting: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4
Reseller Hosting: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/forumdisplay.php?f=130
Good luck!██ SoftSys Hosting ██ - 14 Years In Business - 24/7 In-House Support - Enterprise Class Replicated Cloud Servers For HA
Cloud Hosting With Anti-Malware, IDS/IPS, WAF & Litespeed - Windows 2019 Shared Hosting w/ Plesk
-
01-31-2008, 06:25 AM #7Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 3,590
hi
your .com/net/org (etc) domains will be ranked on google UK so a UK host is best for you if you want your domains to show on google for UK visitors.█ The Hosting Heroes Ltd - over 20 years in the UK hosting industry.
█ Website Hosting | Reseller Hosting | Cloud VPS Servers | Dedicated Servers | VPS Reseller for WHMCS
www.thehostingheroes.com
-
01-31-2008, 02:26 PM #8Disabled
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- USA, EU, UK, CA, AUS
- Posts
- 1,804
We use UK2.Net and they are offering free SSL's now so it might be worth checking them out.
-
02-14-2008, 03:34 PM #9Newbie
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Posts
- 19
We are using Server Intellect and have found that by far, they are the most friendly, responsive, and knowledgeable support team we've ever dealt with.
-
05-29-2008, 07:15 PM #10Newbie
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Posts
- 6
I use Server Intellect. They seem to really give you a lot for the money and their customer service has been very helpful.
-
05-30-2008, 08:53 AM #11Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 389
I don't understand why a reseller account is needed. A shared account should be more than enough for what the guy is looking for.
Hosted with ReliableSite.Net.
-
05-30-2008, 10:51 AM #12Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 1,027
Its nothing to do with where its hosted in terms of where it appears on google.
I have a US based site, primary target is the UK and we are ranked number two on google. So location has nothing to do with.Damien
-
05-30-2008, 12:30 PM #13Location = SoapBox
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 6,564
if they want to provide control panel access to each of their customers to manage their own emails, etc - then a reseller account makes sense.
it actually does. however, it is more related to the IP ownership as to which regional searches sites will be featured on. the one that really doesnt matter is the US, as there isnt a google.us and google.com is an overall type of representation (I was never clear on this until google explained it to me - lol - still dont think Im 100% clear). After the US, if you want regional searches, google will look at the IP ownership. So, if you search for Canadian results only, the only things google considers as Canadian content (apparently) is .ca`s and domains hosted on Canadian IP`s (now, those physical IPs could be hosted in the US or wherever)...www.cartika.com
www.clusterlogics.com - You simply cannot run a hosting company without this software. Backups, Disaster Recovery, Big Data, Virtualization. 20 years of building software that solves your problems
-
05-30-2008, 12:38 PM #14Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 1,027
The evidence which supports that is very flimsley
On yahoo I tend to agree, it does appear to look at where the IP address is.
But I'd say the domain name has more impact than the IP when it comes to UK search results, but despite saying that my primary domain is a .com and it comes up second despite that and stiff competition for page positionDamien