Results 1 to 25 of 57
Thread: Best control panel for IIS 5.0?
-
08-05-2002, 04:21 AM #1Newbie
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 5
Best control panel for IIS 5.0?
I'm new to the hosting world. I got a nice server, and it's all configured, but now for a control panel. I've been looking around, one that seems to be used by alot of hosters is the "administrative suite", but I don't know who it's made by, or if it's actually any good. I was also considering H-Sphere or CPanel, but cost is a big issue, because we're only considering hosting about 50-100 websites. (Unless buisness becomes very good). It's just a side venture, we run a complete technical computer shop, with networking and computer repair, so we know the technical aspect. Just finding a way to automate things a little bit.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Thomas Lasswell
Computers NLA
Websites NLA
-
08-05-2002, 04:30 AM #2Newbie
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 5
Actually, i think i may go for command matrix. I like the way the layout is, and it seems to be very straight forward.
Thanks though,
Thomas
-
08-05-2002, 04:57 AM #3Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Jun 2002
- Location
- Karachi, Pakistan
- Posts
- 332
Originally posted by websitesnla
Actually, i think i may go for command matrix. I like the way the layout is, and it seems to be very straight forward.
Thanks though,
Thomas
plus you won't have to pay anything extra for a pop+webmail solution
-
08-05-2002, 05:27 AM #4Temporarily Suspended
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 318
Looks like you made up your mind before you posted the question
Most CPs you don't have to pay anything for the mail server. Ones that support mailenable you don't have to pay anything, and ones that support mail services on linux you don't either.
-
08-05-2002, 06:19 AM #5Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Belfast
- Posts
- 315
Originally posted by Adam_S
Most CPs you don't have to pay anything for the mail server. Ones that support mailenable you don't have to pay anything, and ones that support mail services on linux you don't either.
Cheers,Jonny b
http://www.vibus.net
UK Reseller, Dedicated & Collocation Accounts
-
08-05-2002, 07:20 AM #6Temporarily Suspended
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 318
They missed out vacation messages. Looks like its in the next release in a week or two. Funny thing to miss out since it does some other really funky stuff which most others don't have
Imail missed out email domain aliasing. For 1000s of dollars you wouldn't think they'd miss things like that.
The webmail isn't in the free version, but at $170 (ish) its far better priced than the others. Their accidental stress test was funny. They sent 4 million mails to the server. But it still remained standing.. must be a good thing
-
08-05-2002, 07:26 AM #7Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Belfast
- Posts
- 315
Originally posted by Adam_S
They missed out vacation messages. Looks like its in the next release in a week or two. Funny thing to miss out since it does some other really funky stuff which most others don't have
Imail missed out email domain aliasing. For 1000s of dollars you wouldn't think they'd miss things like that.
The webmail isn't in the free version, but at $170 (ish) its far better priced than the others. Their accidental stress test was funny. They sent 4 million mails to the server. But it still remained standing.. must be a good thing
Cheers,Jonny b
http://www.vibus.net
UK Reseller, Dedicated & Collocation Accounts
-
08-05-2002, 12:53 PM #8Newbie
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 17
Originally posted by websitesnla
Actually, i think i may go for command matrix. I like the way the layout is, and it seems to be very straight forward.
Thanks though,
Thomas
yes, etrinix command matrix is really straight forward and
got more features/functionalities then any other, with user friendly interface.
-
08-05-2002, 12:58 PM #9Temporarily Suspended
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 318
What features does it have that others don't? It looks to have the same offerings as most other CPs.
-
08-05-2002, 01:27 PM #10Newbie
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 17
well, in command matrix,
obviously, integrated "webmail and pop server" is also an excellent feature, as it does not require one to look around for some free unsupported email software and then confiugure it properly , so, feel out of a big headache.
+ it includes a fileuploading component additionally, means i wont need to buy it separately, like i used "soft artisans fileuploading component, n y do i need it ? obviously bcoz most of the clients ask for such components ...
+ iis application mappings", "custom errors", zone file editing, Dot Net support ...etc.
+ resellers can manage client site without logging into control panel using client's userid/password.
+ its strong content security, in which one client can not access other client's website contents ... while this vulnerability does exist in approx. all the existing hosting control panels.
+ btw, "good price" is a feature too ...
FYI: i know some features are already present in exisiting control panels, but most of them does not cantain all these collectively in one.
-
08-05-2002, 01:29 PM #11Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Kansas City, Missouri
- Posts
- 265
Where is the CP command matrix located?
ICQ:176143736
-
08-05-2002, 02:29 PM #12Temporarily Suspended
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 318
The mail+webmail isn't an excellent feature. Its a stronghold. Some people like to choose which mail server software they want for various reasons. Having to have to use a single one is a lack of flexibility. Most hosting businesses can easily justify looking at various software vendors that makes the quality of their services more appealing or fit their goals. Its not a good thing, it can be quite the opposite.
Experience shows that clients ask for many components. Uploading components are the most critical because of the security implications that they have. Most hosts are very cautious about what they install often leave this type of component at least a few months to ensure it is not going to compromise their servers. Even with experienced component developers such as Soft Artisan as you mentioned, the rule still applies. Also many internet users borrow or purchase scripts and applications that use common upload components. This means that the host will have to purchase the SAUpload, ASPUpload etc anyway for better support of their client base.
Allowing a user or reseller to change an application mapping is something that can be a serious risk of security. Say that I change the mapping .asp to run the copy, move, del or format command or even an uploaded executable? (Which I think is possible). I wouldn't like to be the person that has to clear up the mess. Admins would very rarely have to change them. Most product installs update these themselves. What would a CP be required to change them for?
Custom error messages isn't new. There isn't many CPs that don't offer this these days. Zone editing isn't as common but its not exactly rare either, even for the reseller and customer levels.
Older CPs have been noted on the lack of access to lower levels. The ability to step through the system is getting more common and it won't be long before pretty much all in not most offer this. I haven't seen many new ones that don't so far. I can't see in the CM demo where it allows this?
There is just one may be two current CPs that have poor site to site security. Not quite "all"
This means that the differences you have actually mentioned act, in many cases, against the CP rather than for.
"good price" is a feature. But cheap doesn't make up for a CP that doesn't work for the business.Last edited by Adam_S; 08-05-2002 at 02:41 PM.
-
08-05-2002, 02:50 PM #13Newbie
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 17
oh! u mean i buy *everything* separately, n make/develop a CP myself ? huh!
dont u ever feel relief when u see that IIS is coming with Windows ??? hope u'll get the idea ...
n btw, m neither a millionair nor i can spend openly without a valid reason !!!
actually what i felt i wrote, i didnt know that u r doing ur hosting bussiness(if any) somewhere else, not at "planet earth" ...
coz the points i wrote above were exactly the demanding and apealing things for planet earth bussiness...
anyways,
no hard feelings, n pls keep up ur "discussion" for "discussion" ...
m outta it now ... !
-
08-05-2002, 03:00 PM #14Temporarily Suspended
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 318
I never mentioned buying everything separately, nor developing a CP yourself. IIS does come with Windows, but you don't have to have it installed and you can use an alternative instead. Do you see what I mean?
I'm wondering if I said something confusing.Last edited by Adam_S; 08-05-2002 at 03:07 PM.
-
08-05-2002, 05:57 PM #15Newbie
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 26
Originally posted by Adam_S
The mail+webmail isn't an excellent feature. Its a stronghold. Some people like to choose which mail server software they want for various reasons. Having to have to use a single one is a lack of flexibility. Most hosting businesses can easily justify looking at various software vendors that makes the quality of their services more appealing or fit their goals. Its not a good thing, it can be quite the opposite.
However, you are right, it would be more flexible to allow users a choice between the many options for mail servers out there.
Which would you recommend?
Experience shows that clients ask for many components.
Uploading components are the most critical because of the security implications that they have. Most hosts are very cautious about what they install often leave this type of component at least a few months to ensure it is not going to compromise their servers. Even with experienced component developers such as Soft Artisan as you mentioned, the rule still applies.
The etrFileUP has been tested for every vulnerability known to have ailed such components, EVER! Not saying that it is perfect and cannot break or anything, but we have tested to make sure it's pretty sturdy.
Also many internet users borrow or purchase scripts and applications that use common upload components. This means that the host will have to purchase the SAUpload, ASPUpload etc anyway for better support of their client base.
However, the CM in no way restricts the server admins to use only the etrFileUp. They can always register as many similar COMs as suits their fancy
Allowing a user or reseller to change an application mapping is something that can be a serious risk of security. Say that I change the mapping .asp to run the copy, move, del or format command or even an uploaded executable? (Which I think is possible). I wouldn't like to be the person that has to clear up the mess. Admins would very rarely have to change them. Most product installs update these themselves. What would a CP be required to change them for?
The CM allows users to change the Application Mapping Extensions. Example map .xyz to be interpreted as ASP.
The "Verbs" for these maps cannot be changed and stay as default. Example "GET,HEAD,POST,TRACE" etc. So, I believe no security risk there?
BTW, this option was added upon a request from one of our testers, since they thought it somehow a neat feature to offer client 'x' who would like to run his ASP apps with the ".companyname" extension (looks 'cool' dun it?)
Custom error messages isn't new. There isn't many CPs that don't offer this these days. Zone editing isn't as common but its not exactly rare either, even for the reseller and customer levels.
Agreed. So add one more to the 'evergrowing' list?
BTW, lets count the number of CP's for win2k currently on the market? (I mean, actually launched?)
Older CPs have been noted on the lack of access to lower levels. The ability to step through the system is getting more common and it won't be long before pretty much all in not most offer this. I haven't seen many new ones that don't so far. I can't see in the CM demo where it allows this?
All admins can access reseller panels using the server admin passes. Same is true for resellers.
Example:
Admin logs in to a reseller's panel using:
username: reseller
password: serveradminpass
Reseller logs in to an enduser's panel using:
username: enduser
password: resellerspass
A bit hard to display on the current demo, but you are right, we should have made this feature more prominent somewhere.
Thank you for the excellent suggestion
There is just one may be two current CPs that have poor site to site security. Not quite "all"
Like I said above, "lets count the number of CP's for win2k currently on the market? (I mean, actually launched?)"
This means that the differences you have actually mentioned act, in many cases, against the CP rather than for.
How?
"good price" is a feature. But cheap doesn't make up for a CP that doesn't work for the business.Etrinix Corporation
http://www.etrinix.com
-
08-05-2002, 06:19 PM #16Newbie
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 5
Thanks alot, you guys just confirmed all the things i've heard about command matrix. I posted the first reponse, thinking i wanted to know what would work well, then i went browsing. I found command matrix, and liked it from the get go. I'm gonna put the order through today probably, and tell yah how the install goes.
Thanks again,
Thomas Lasswell
Websites NLA
-
08-05-2002, 08:57 PM #17Temporarily Suspended
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 318
Which would you recommend?
One thing to note is that there is no info about it on your site.
How?
However, you are right, it would be more flexible to allow users a choice between the many options for mail servers out there.
The CM allows users to change the Application Mapping Extensions. Example map .xyz to be interpreted as ASP.
All admins can access reseller panels using the server admin passes. Same is true for resellers.
Example:
Admin logs in to a reseller's panel using:
username: reseller
password: serveradminpass
Reseller logs in to an enduser's panel using:
username: enduser
password: resellerspass
+ resellers can manage client site without logging into control panel using client's userid/password.
-
08-05-2002, 09:30 PM #18Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- London, England
- Posts
- 335
Originally posted by Adam_S
They missed out vacation messages. Looks like its in the next release in a week or two. Funny thing to miss out since it does some other really funky stuff which most others don't have
Imail missed out email domain aliasing. For 1000s of dollars you wouldn't think they'd miss things like that.
The webmail isn't in the free version, but at $170 (ish) its far better priced than the others. Their accidental stress test was funny. They sent 4 million mails to the server. But it still remained standing.. must be a good thing
Pretty darn scaleable (and stable) too - one of our clients runs somewhere between 250k to 300k accounts on a single quad Xeon dedicated.••• Mark Castle •••
••• www.captivereality.com •••
••• domainlabs.uk •••
My views are my own and not those of my company.
-
08-05-2002, 09:36 PM #19Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Sep 2000
- Posts
- 242
I would just like to add my 2 cents here. Based on my experience of rolling out control panels, I must say that one of the most important feature is flexibility. People are unique and almost never is 2 installations the same. Everyone does things a little different.
I have found that the best way to provide a panel is to go with the flow and provide as much flexibility as possible (as long as it does not interefere with the functionality and stability). Enforcing best practice standards does not work always work out well with a client who has been doing things his/her own way. Neither is it fair for a client to change their existing processes to work around a panel (instead of the other way around)
While I agree having a free mail/pop solution that, stats or DNS is definitely a plus point, its equally important to allow the client to also use the panel with other 3rd party packages. That is what normally makes or breaks a CP. And this is also the trickiest part.
:-)WebserverCP.NET
- A Full Featured Windows 2000 Server Hosting Control Panel... "simple but effective"
-
08-06-2002, 02:40 AM #20Newbie
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 26
Originally posted by Adam_S
I find it odd that there are other IIS settings missed that are more commonly requested to be changed but you decided to implement this one.
I'd be extremely obliged if you could point out the most commonly requested IIS settings missed out?
There is some confusion here. It was said that ...
Where??
The solution you have doesn't match what was described.Etrinix Corporation
http://www.etrinix.com
-
08-06-2002, 02:42 AM #21Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Kansas City, Missouri
- Posts
- 265
one of our clients runs somewhere between 250k to 300k accounts on a single quad Xeon dedicated.
Better be careful though, IMAIL might want that statement to promote thier product...
ICQ:176143736
-
08-06-2002, 04:29 AM #22Temporarily Suspended
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 318
Imail can handle a lot of sites. I haven't seen someone run that many before, but I suppose with a beefy server like that it shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Impressive non-the-less
The domain aliasing I can't seem to find? Is it in v6 and 7? Just in case we are talking about different things. Domain aliasing is where i can have two domains for the same mailbox. So if I set up domain1.com and a pop3 account (say mail@), then setup domain2.com as an alias of domain1.com. Any mail to mail@domain1.com and mail@domain2.com are picked up by the mail@ account. There is only one POP3 account.
If this is what you also had in mind please let me know where this is set up. I've been looking all over the app.
Granted that imail comes with webmail, but since you are paying quite a lot for the product I'd assume the cost is within the overall system price.
-
08-06-2002, 04:35 AM #23Temporarily Suspended
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 318
Originally posted by mattan
I would just like to add my 2 cents here. Based on my experience of rolling out control panels, I must say that one of the most important feature is flexibility. People are unique and almost never is 2 installations the same. Everyone does things a little different.
I have found that the best way to provide a panel is to go with the flow and provide as much flexibility as possible (as long as it does not interefere with the functionality and stability). Enforcing best practice standards does not work always work out well with a client who has been doing things his/her own way. Neither is it fair for a client to change their existing processes to work around a panel (instead of the other way around)
:-)
Either that or we are both...
doing ur hosting bussiness(if any) somewhere else, not at "planet earth"
-
08-06-2002, 05:08 AM #24Temporarily Suspended
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 318
Originally posted by Adam_S
If this is what you also had in mind please let me know where this is set up. I've been looking all over the app.
-
08-06-2002, 06:48 AM #25Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- London, England
- Posts
- 335
Originally posted by NodeHost
WHOA!!! That is a good server then. IMAIL (we use) is very low on processes, but that is a kickin' mail server.
Better be careful though, IMAIL might want that statement to promote thier product...
Cheers••• Mark Castle •••
••• www.captivereality.com •••
••• domainlabs.uk •••
My views are my own and not those of my company.