Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Orange County, CA, USA
    Posts
    38

    * whmc vs clientexec

    I've been hearing a lot about these two on this forum. Whmcs seems a bit more popular? which would you guys recommend? ease of use for me and clients, pricing, performance, security and maintenance are some things i'm trying to compare. also, any experiences with freeside, rodopi, or optigold? a lot of questions//thanx in advanced!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    96
    search is your friend
    RestoreMax - The benchmark of PC Remote Backup Software for web hosts
    RestoreMax Standard Edition [Available Now]
    Distributor License launching in 4 weeks!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    893
    Both are very good.

    They both have demos.

    WHMCS is easier to skin, but clientexec has a very stable 'feel' to it.

    Just try them both, play around and choose for your self.

    Personally, I'd lean towards whmcs.

  4. #4
    i use WHMCS and i love it

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,018
    I use WHMCS. The main reason I picked WHMCS is because of how easy it was to use. What I felt was difficult to do with clientexec was manage clients domain names. If they wanted to change there nameservers on a domain, they would have to contact me. But with the Domain Management built into WHMCS, the clients can do it themselves.

    The support system built into WHMCS is also very helpful. It saves you time and money by not have to install and maintain another support system.

  6. #6
    We personally use WHMCS for our hosting company and it is quite a good software... Simple and yet has lots of features

    Sincerely,

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Orange County, CA, USA
    Posts
    38
    Wow. Thanks for all your responses! =) It looks as though I'm going to go with WHCMS

  8. #8
    good choice! feel free to repost if you experience any problems...

  9. #9
    lol, I use Clientexec, and after reading this, I feel like im going to get WHMCS too.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,988
    I use to love WHMCS until I started using ClientExec again. I just found out that it has a TeamSpeak plugin which makes my life easier Also, their interface is much more professional.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,737
    John, how specifically do you find Clientexec's interface more professional than WHMCS? Would be useful information for many of us.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    893
    Quote Originally Posted by brianoz View Post
    John, how specifically do you find Clientexec's interface more professional than WHMCS? Would be useful information for many of us.
    It feels 'stable' in my opinion. Effort in the design aspect etc, where as WHMCS I'd say the admin screen is more core / base.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    464
    WHMCS by far.

    I have used both WHMCS and clientexec, and I have found that I like WHMCS and my clients also like it. It has much more features, and its very easy to skin. It is also cheaper to lease monthly.
    HostMonkey | Your kingdom starts here. (tweet us @HostMonkeynet)
    Affordable and Reliable Shared Hosting, VPS Servers, and Dedicated Servers
    OpenVZ, SolusVM CP, 99.9% Uptime Guarantee, 24x7x365 Support
    Server Reseller Program: significant discounts, to increase your profits!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    345
    Both are quite good, but vote goes toward WHMCS.

    Constant updates with new features being added by recommendations from customers that use the software day in and out (which sets WHMCS apart), terrific support...Matt and his team know how to run things, ease of use as well as easy to customize the user experience to fit your business.
    LaneHost.com | Professional Web Hosting Solutions
    Affordable Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting & Dedicated Servers at Great Prices!
    Follow us on Twitter!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,988
    Everything in ClientExec just feel so much more organized and professional. While when you look at WHMCS the color scheme is pretty much the same... blue.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    345
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnJ View Post
    Everything in ClientExec just feel so much more organized and professional. While when you look at WHMCS the color scheme is pretty much the same... blue.
    It really just boils down to personal preference
    LaneHost.com | Professional Web Hosting Solutions
    Affordable Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting & Dedicated Servers at Great Prices!
    Follow us on Twitter!

  17. #17
    WHMCS all the way.

    I've used both, and switched to WHMCS after my clients feedbacks.
    It was little hard at first sight, they would just search search and search...
    Universal Hosts - Premium Web Hosting for non premium Prices
    Now providing Virtual Private Servers and Managed Dedicated Servers.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •