Results 1 to 17 of 17
Thread: whmc vs clientexec
-
11-17-2007, 07:55 AM #1Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Orange County, CA, USA
- Posts
- 38
whmc vs clientexec
I've been hearing a lot about these two on this forum. Whmcs seems a bit more popular? which would you guys recommend? ease of use for me and clients, pricing, performance, security and maintenance are some things i'm trying to compare. also, any experiences with freeside, rodopi, or optigold? a lot of questions//thanx in advanced!
-
11-17-2007, 01:39 PM #2Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 96
search is your friend
RestoreMax - The benchmark of PC Remote Backup Software for web hosts
RestoreMax Standard Edition [Available Now]
Distributor License launching in 4 weeks!
-
11-17-2007, 02:41 PM #3Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 893
Both are very good.
They both have demos.
WHMCS is easier to skin, but clientexec has a very stable 'feel' to it.
Just try them both, play around and choose for your self.
Personally, I'd lean towards whmcs.
-
11-17-2007, 03:12 PM #4Newbie
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 16
i use WHMCS and i love it
-
11-17-2007, 05:41 PM #5Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 1,018
I use WHMCS. The main reason I picked WHMCS is because of how easy it was to use. What I felt was difficult to do with clientexec was manage clients domain names. If they wanted to change there nameservers on a domain, they would have to contact me. But with the Domain Management built into WHMCS, the clients can do it themselves.
The support system built into WHMCS is also very helpful. It saves you time and money by not have to install and maintain another support system.
-
11-17-2007, 10:18 PM #6Newbie
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 8
We personally use WHMCS for our hosting company and it is quite a good software... Simple and yet has lots of features
Sincerely,
-
11-17-2007, 11:05 PM #7Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Orange County, CA, USA
- Posts
- 38
Wow. Thanks for all your responses! =) It looks as though I'm going to go with WHCMS
-
11-17-2007, 11:13 PM #8Newbie
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 8
good choice! feel free to repost if you experience any problems...
-
11-18-2007, 03:32 AM #9Disabled
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 238
lol, I use Clientexec, and after reading this, I feel like im going to get WHMCS too.
-
11-18-2007, 04:27 AM #10Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Carolina
- Posts
- 4,988
I use to love WHMCS until I started using ClientExec again. I just found out that it has a TeamSpeak plugin which makes my life easier Also, their interface is much more professional.
-
11-18-2007, 08:18 AM #11Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 1,737
John, how specifically do you find Clientexec's interface more professional than WHMCS? Would be useful information for many of us.
-
11-18-2007, 12:23 PM #12Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 893
-
11-18-2007, 08:34 PM #13Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- NY
- Posts
- 464
WHMCS by far.
I have used both WHMCS and clientexec, and I have found that I like WHMCS and my clients also like it. It has much more features, and its very easy to skin. It is also cheaper to lease monthly.██ HostMonkey | Your kingdom starts here. (tweet us @HostMonkeynet)
██ Affordable and Reliable Shared Hosting, VPS Servers, and Dedicated Servers
██ OpenVZ, SolusVM CP, 99.9% Uptime Guarantee, 24x7x365 Support
██ Server Reseller Program: significant discounts, to increase your profits!
-
11-18-2007, 08:38 PM #14Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Houston, TX USA
- Posts
- 345
Both are quite good, but vote goes toward WHMCS.
Constant updates with new features being added by recommendations from customers that use the software day in and out (which sets WHMCS apart), terrific support...Matt and his team know how to run things, ease of use as well as easy to customize the user experience to fit your business.LaneHost.com | Professional Web Hosting Solutions
Affordable Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting & Dedicated Servers at Great Prices!
Follow us on Twitter!
-
11-18-2007, 08:41 PM #15Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Carolina
- Posts
- 4,988
Everything in ClientExec just feel so much more organized and professional. While when you look at WHMCS the color scheme is pretty much the same... blue.
-
11-18-2007, 08:50 PM #16Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Houston, TX USA
- Posts
- 345
LaneHost.com | Professional Web Hosting Solutions
Affordable Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting & Dedicated Servers at Great Prices!
Follow us on Twitter!
-
11-19-2007, 12:02 PM #17WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 139
WHMCS all the way.
I've used both, and switched to WHMCS after my clients feedbacks.
It was little hard at first sight, they would just search search and search...Universal Hosts - Premium Web Hosting for non premium Prices
Now providing Virtual Private Servers and Managed Dedicated Servers.