Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,054

    speed test on fastservers.net server please

    Can I get a speed test
    on this win2k box I just got from
    fastservers.net please thanks

    216.218.211.103

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    3,729
    Tracing route to 216.218.211.103 over a maximum of 30 hops

    1 11 ms 10 ms <10 ms 10.47.96.1
    2 <10 ms 30 ms 11 ms 24-29-100-41.nyc.rr.com [24.29.100.41]
    3 40 ms 10 ms 10 ms pos2-0-nycmnyr-rtr1.nyc.rr.com [24.29.100.90]
    4 <10 ms 51 ms 10 ms pos3-0-nycmnya-rtr1.nyc.rr.com [24.29.97.29]
    5 <10 ms 20 ms 40 ms pop1-nye-P0-2.atdn.net [66.185.137.193]
    6 <10 ms 10 ms 10 ms HE.atdn.net [66.185.149.198]
    7 30 ms 40 ms 40 ms 216.218.255.249
    8 80 ms 90 ms 90 ms 10.201.10.1
    9 * 80 ms * gige-g0-0.gsr12008.fmt.he.net [216.218.130.6]
    10 100 ms 90 ms 100 ms 64.71.131.174
    11 171 ms 140 ms 120 ms 216.218.211.103

    C:\>ping 216.218.211.103

    Pinging 216.218.211.103 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=115
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.

    Ping statistics for 216.218.211.103:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 1, Lost = 3 (75% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 110ms, Maximum = 110ms, Average = 27ms

    C:\>ping 216.218.211.103

    Pinging 216.218.211.103 with 32 bytes of data:

    Request timed out.
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=115
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=115
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=115

    Ping statistics for 216.218.211.103:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 90ms, Maximum = 90ms, Average = 67ms


    Not good....but it's been posted that HE is having some troubles today, so it's most likely caused by that.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    191
    Confirmed-

    Issues are rampant at HE / MAE West as a whole right now, I've been told. Things are nearing a conclusion, I'm told from the network admin at the datacenter @ HE. As of right now, I'm not losing any packets, though it appeared things had stabilized a few times earlier


    At any rate, progress is being made and things should return to normal very shortly. This was an extremely rare occurrence- this is coming from 6+ years of experience at that datacenter.

    Hopefully future stability and efficiency will back me up.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,054
    can someone do these speed test now please, i think fastservers.net is back again....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    542
    Pings arent really a good measure of speed, maybe put a file up for us to download so we can give you a more accurate measure of speed?

    That said,

    ping 216.218.211.103

    Pinging 216.218.211.103 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=121
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=121
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=121
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=121

    Ping statistics for 216.218.211.103:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss)



    Ah, the joys of being 4 hops away from he.net

    Can't wait till it's time for my next server, I'm going to give fastservers a try.
    Jay &#187; [email protected] • AIM &#187; FDrive Support
    Front Drive&trade; &#187; Advanced multi-domain solutions
    http://www.frontdrive.com/

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    New York/USA
    Posts
    1,690
    I agree. Although pings and traceroute are good measures of how well a box is connected, in order to test the true speed of the connections, you will need a test file somewhere on the network. That way, you will get an accurate measure of the throughput. Another good way to test the pings and traceroute yourself is to use a looking glass like www.traceroute.org.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Posts
    2,687
    Pinging 216.218.211.103 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=187ms TTL=113
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=195ms TTL=113
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=187ms TTL=113
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=188ms TTL=113

    Ping statistics for 216.218.211.103:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 187ms, Maximum = 195ms, Average = 189ms

    From a 1Mbit line in the UK. Generally I get between 90ms - 150ms to US based sites.
    Chris Adams - CEO - Rochen Ltd. - chris (at) rochen (dot) com

    Now offering both US & UK premium business hosting, reseller hosting and managed virtualized services.
    rochen.com | rochen.co.uk | blog.rochen.com | forums.rochen.com | Twitter: @rochenhost

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    191
    I would tend to agree- Western Europe is where routes to our network @ MAE West (San Jose) tend to be weakest. Though many are still more than happy with it.

    There are some speed analysis details (especially related to throughput), mentioned in the forum if you do a search.
    specifically here:
    http://webhostingtalk.com/showthread...s&pagenumber=5

    I'm not attempting to get this thread locked for morphing into an ad- just attempting to provide some examples of the network.


    So be careful, and keep the questions geared towards the purpose of the thread or Chicken will chomp us.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    365

    Ping Test

    Pinging 216.218.211.103 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=115
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=115
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=115
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=115
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=115
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=115
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=115
    Reply from 216.218.211.103: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=115

    Very stable pings.

  10. #10
    PING 216.218.211.103 (216.218.211.103) from 64.246.16.91 : 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 216.218.211.103: icmp_seq=0 ttl=119 time=48.918 msec
    64 bytes from 216.218.211.103: icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=48.994 msec
    64 bytes from 216.218.211.103: icmp_seq=2 ttl=119 time=48.652 msec
    64 bytes from 216.218.211.103: icmp_seq=3 ttl=119 time=49.137 msec
    64 bytes from 216.218.211.103: icmp_seq=4 ttl=119 time=49.328 msec
    64 bytes from 216.218.211.103: icmp_seq=5 ttl=119 time=48.667 msec
    64 bytes from 216.218.211.103: icmp_seq=6 ttl=119 time=49.050 msec
    64 bytes from 216.218.211.103: icmp_seq=7 ttl=119 time=49.710 msec

    --- 216.218.211.103 ping statistics ---
    8 packets transmitted, 8 packets received, 0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 48.652/49.057/49.710/0.325 ms
    http://www.sonichost.net
    Hosting Solutions That Won't Break Your Budget!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    PA, USA
    Posts
    5,137
    funny how people keeps giving ping result for a speed test. A T1 may still give you the same ping time as an OC12. As some have already mentioned, to do speed test, then try downloading some Mega bytes of file from a server inside fastserver.net network.

    Ping does not tell anything in this case. Please ... no more ping results.
    Fluid Hosting, LLC - HSphere Shared and Reseller hosting - Now with HIGH AVAILABILITY
    Fluid VPS - Linux and Windows Virtuozzo VPS - Enterprise VPS with up to 2 GB guaranteed memory!
    Get your N+1 High Availability Enterprise Cloud
    Equinix Secaucus NY2 (NYC Metro)

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,298
    Tracing route to 216.218.211.103 over a maximum of 30 hops



    1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms Cisco [192.168.1.1]
    2 20 ms 10 ms 20 ms fe2-0.cr0.vlb.worldonline.dk [213.237.5.49]
    3 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms cr0.boet.worldonline.dk [213.237.127.6]
    4 20 ms 30 ms 40 ms cr0.hvi.worldonline.dk [213.237.127.26]
    5 71 ms 30 ms 30 ms cr0.vby.worldonline.dk [213.237.127.60]
    6 20 ms 100 ms 100 ms cr0.pbv.worldonline.dk [213.237.127.254]
    7 20 ms 40 ms 60 ms so-4-2-0.cph10.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.73.5]
    8 40 ms 100 ms 80 ms so-5-0-0.ams20.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.81.41]
    9 40 ms 40 ms 60 ms so-2-0-0.ams10.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.81.54]
    10 70 ms 40 ms 50 ms so-2-0-0.lon12.ip.tiscali.net [213.200.81.149]
    11 60 ms 70 ms 50 ms 213.200.77.5
    12 50 ms 80 ms 60 ms so-4-1-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.mfnx.net [208.185.156.2]
    13 60 ms 51 ms 50 ms so-0-0-0.cr1.lhr3.uk.mfnx.net [208.184.231.145]
    14 130 ms 121 ms 130 ms so-7-0-0.cr1.dca2.us.mfnx.net [64.125.31.186]
    15 200 ms 211 ms 200 ms so-3-0-0.mpr3.sjc2.us.mfnx.net [208.184.233.133]
    16 180 ms 201 ms 200 ms pos5-0.mpr1.pao1.us.mfnx.net [208.184.233.142]
    17 191 ms 190 ms 190 ms 209.249.24.136.he.net [209.249.24.136]
    18 191 ms 200 ms 190 ms gige-g0-0.gsr12008.fmt.he.net [216.218.130.6]
    19 190 ms 190 ms 200 ms 64.71.131.174
    20 190 ms 220 ms 210 ms 216.218.211.103

    From Denmark

  13. #13
    FastServers.Net
    More than a Server, It's a Solution
    Dedicated Servers | Colocation

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    32
    07:45:53 (566.23 KB/s) - `http.139m.sav' saved [146043732/146043732] from nocster.com

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,298
    139mb download --> http://65.19.139.18/test/http.139m.sav

    78KB/sec with a 1MBit ADSL connection from Denmark

    John

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    892
    100%[====================================>] 52,428,800 7.26M/s ETA 00:00

    11:11:23 (7.26 MB/s) - `http.50m.sav' saved [52428800/52428800]

    between 7 and 8.5 Mbps from my server in the San Francisco Bay Area

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,621
    I will think your server is inside HE too, inside the same data center as fastserver's. So it's internal transfer probably just between switches (if not through the same switch) and hence you are getting that high number.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    124
    *****
    Ping wird ausgeführt für 216.218.211.103 mit 32 Bytes Daten:

    Antwort von 216.218.211.103: Bytes=32 Zeit=172ms TTL=111
    Antwort von 216.218.211.103: Bytes=32 Zeit=172ms TTL=111
    Antwort von 216.218.211.103: Bytes=32 Zeit=172ms TTL=111
    Antwort von 216.218.211.103: Bytes=32 Zeit=172ms TTL=111

    Ping-Statistik für 216.218.211.103:
    Pakete: Gesendet = 4, Empfangen = 4, Verloren = 0 (0% Verlust),
    Ca. Zeitangaben in Millisek.:
    Minimum = 172ms, Maximum = 172ms, Mittelwert = 172ms
    *****
    Routenverfolgung zu 216.218.211.103 über maximal 30 Abschnitte

    1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.1.1
    2 <10 ms 15 ms 16 ms 212.53.104.xxx
    3 <10 ms 15 ms 16 ms ec-zrh-bor01.net.econophone.ch [212.53.96.xxx]
    4 <10 ms 16 ms 15 ms Loopback0.GW2.ZUR4.Alter.Net [146.188.0.68]
    5 16 ms <10 ms 16 ms 422.at-2-0-0.XR2.ZUR4.Alter.Net [146.188.9.225]

    6 <10 ms 16 ms 15 ms so-1-0-0.TR1.ZUR3.Alter.Net [146.188.3.77]
    7 94 ms 94 ms 109 ms so-4-0-0.IR1.NYC12.Alter.Net [146.188.3.201]
    8 94 ms 94 ms 109 ms 0.so-1-0-0.IL1.NYC9.ALTER.NET [152.63.23.61]
    9 93 ms 94 ms 109 ms 0.so-3-0-0.TL1.NYC9.ALTER.NET [152.63.9.246]
    10 93 ms 110 ms 94 ms 0.so-2-1-0.XL1.NYC8.ALTER.NET [152.63.1.41]
    11 94 ms 109 ms 94 ms 0.so-3-0-0.XR1.NYC8.ALTER.NET [152.63.19.30]
    12 94 ms 93 ms 110 ms 183.ATM4-0.BR1.NYC8.ALTER.NET [152.63.23.73]
    13 94 ms 110 ms 93 ms 200.atm6-0.pr1.lga2.us.mfnx.net [208.184.231.245
    ]
    14 94 ms 109 ms 94 ms so-2-2-0.cr2.lga2.us.mfnx.net [216.200.127.169]

    15 94 ms 109 ms 94 ms so-0-0-0.cr2.lga1.us.mfnx.net [208.184.232.197]

    16 94 ms 110 ms 109 ms so-1-0-0.cr2.iad1.us.mfnx.net [208.184.233.65]
    17 94 ms 109 ms 110 ms pos8-0.mpr1.iad1.us.mfnx.net [208.185.0.145]
    18 156 ms 172 ms 172 ms so-6-1-0.mpr4.sjc2.us.mfnx.net [216.200.127.26]

    19 172 ms 172 ms 172 ms pos6-0.mpr2.pao1.us.mfnx.net [208.185.175.162]
    20 172 ms 157 ms 187 ms 209.249.24.136.he.net [209.249.24.136]
    21 172 ms 172 ms 171 ms gige-g0-0.gsr12008.fmt.he.net [216.218.130.6]
    22 172 ms 172 ms 172 ms 64.71.131.174
    23 172 ms 172 ms 171 ms 216.218.211.103

    Ablaufverfolgung beendet.
    *****
    From a aDSL-Line (2MBit down/376KBit up) in Switzerland who uses uunet.
    **** Greetings from Switzerland:: Marco ****
    *** little Info: I'm from a NonEnglish-Country so hope you understand what I mean ***

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    1,017
    12:49:10 (273.31 KB/s) - `http.03m.sav' saved [2908160/2908160] (39ms ping) from telus 8mbps down/1mbps up dsl... bloody fast if u ask me... !

    14:38:00 (440.24 KB/s) - `http.03m.sav' saved [2908160/2908160] (82ms ping) from fdcservers

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1,262
    Originally posted by ap_surge
    Enjoy!

    3mb download --> http://65.19.139.18/test/http.03m.sav
    10mb download --> http://65.19.139.18/test/http.10m.sav
    50mb download --> http://65.19.139.18/test/http.50m.sav
    139mb download --> http://65.19.139.18/test/http.139m.sav
    Atrivo in CA -- cogent
    --------
    100%[====================================>] 52,428,800 5.45M/s ETA 00:00

    13:28:35 (5.45 MB/s) - `http.50m.sav' saved [52428800/52428800]
    -------

    Webreseller in PA -- Yipes
    -------
    16:33:32 (495.90 KB/s) - `http.50m.sav' saved [52428800/52428800]

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •