Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : Dedicated Server : Need server PNAP, NY

[sailorfx]

I need a Windows dedicated server very close (2-3 hops maybe?) to this IP 209.191.128.96. This is a PNAP router in NY.

Thanks.

[CGotzmann]

try and see what voxrox.com or voxel.net route to that ip

[jayglate]

Hops don't mean anything are you sure you don't mean low latency?

[sailorfx]

I do not have access to that IP address so I cannot traceroute to any suggested network.

By hops I definitely mean low latency.

I was hopping that somebody will come up with a company that uses the same datacenter and offers dedicated servers.

btw, thats an vibrant community, in a matter of minutes i got replies!!! well done.

[jayglate]

Most anyone in the NYC/NNJ Metro area would be under 1ms to that IP.

[The Broadband Man]

Email reyner@globalcon.net - he has a server in NY there

[Xandrios]

May I ask why you need such low latency? I cant think of anything that would require such. For Gaming 1 or 5ms surely doesnt matter much

I get:
~3.0ms from olm.net in CT
~3.2ms from Level3 in Philly (razorservers)

Both very affordable if budget is an issue

Its usually bad practice to ping a router though, cause with heavy traffic ping (echo) replies are the first that it will drop (That is why some routers show massive packetloss, but traffic flowing through it still runs fine)

[Jdubz31]

Originally Posted by Xandrios

May I ask why you need such low latency? I cant think of anything that would require such. For Gaming 1 or 5ms surely doesnt matter much

Though I would tend to agree, some gamers can be quite the pain over 1-2 ms. I would assume he's either looking for more affordable alternatives to the network behind the PNAP router, or he's looking to do some file transfers across networks?

Either way, Voxel is a solid option for NYC connectivity.

[IPv6]

Voxel is your best choice.

[snickn]

FortressITX is pretty close to that IP

[root@server1 istim]# ping 209.191.128.96
PING 209.191.128.96 (209.191.128.96) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 209.191.128.96: icmp_seq=0 ttl=248 time=2.38 ms
64 bytes from 209.191.128.96: icmp_seq=1 ttl=248 time=2.29 ms

[bqinternet]

I'll second the Voxel recommendation:

PING 209.191.128.96 (209.191.128.96): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 209.191.128.96: icmp_seq=0 ttl=248 time=0.759 ms
64 bytes from 209.191.128.96: icmp_seq=1 ttl=248 time=0.830 ms

[layer0]

I'll third Voxel.

But, if you really do want Internap, you can contact www.thorn.net.

[THill]

My server at thenynoc.com

ping 209.191.128.96
PING 209.191.128.96 (209.191.128.96) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 209.191.128.96: icmp_seq=0 ttl=250 time=1.60 ms
64 bytes from 209.191.128.96: icmp_seq=1 ttl=250 time=1.56 ms
64 bytes from 209.191.128.96: icmp_seq=2 ttl=250 time=1.56 ms
64 bytes from 209.191.128.96: icmp_seq=3 ttl=250 time=2.36 ms
64 bytes from 209.191.128.96: icmp_seq=4 ttl=250 time=1.53 ms

--- 209.191.128.96 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.536/1.725/2.361/0.321 ms, pipe 2

--------------------

traceroute 209.191.128.96
traceroute to 209.191.128.96 (209.191.128.96), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 206.71.148.236 (206.71.148.236) 0.067 ms 0.042 ms 0.028 ms
2 pos-4-4.br1.nyc1.cns-ny.net (206.71.144.177) 19.035 ms 1.493 ms 1.530 ms
3 207.136.177.241 (207.136.177.241) 1.606 ms 1.973 ms 1.557 ms
4 InterNAP-Ken-Schmid-GigE.ge-2-1-0.ar1.JFK1.gblx.net (64.208.26.126) 3.596 ms 2.664 ms *
5 border27.po1-bbnet1.nyc.pnap.net (209.191.128.96) 1.732 ms * 1.692 ms