Results 1 to 25 of 126
-
07-13-2002, 03:49 PM #1Nerf Herder
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Internet / Colorado
- Posts
- 1,660
Anyone still having timeouts with webreseller.net?
Are you guys still having timeouts with your servers? Its much better than yesterday but still dropping a few at times, anyone got an update on how the move is going?
-
07-13-2002, 03:59 PM #2Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Posts
- 41
Yes, I'm still experiencing it here as well. I was going to wait until Monday to post to see if it would be fixed by then.
The packet loss is not at the levels we were seeing yesterday, but it is certainly high and impacting performance compared to the service level before the move. Hopefully this is just a temporary problem that is being worked on as we speak.
I would hate to have these slower speeds as the new Webreseller norm.
-
07-13-2002, 04:06 PM #3Disabled
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 25
The move is still in progress.. i know this because my server hasnt been moved yet, give them a few days till they complete the move and everything should be back to normal. It isnt an easy task to move 600+ servers to another location. We all should be greatful that we get to keep the same IP's and still keep our connection somewhat descent in most cases either we would need to get new ip's or one side shutoff while the other stays up. I still dont see how they are doing it, how are they having routes going to two different locations for the same IP blocks , well that is probably the reason for the packet loss anyhow i am assuming, its goign to one location and timing out and the next packet goes to the other location and is able to connect.. maybe maybe not but we are still lucky.
-
07-13-2002, 05:07 PM #4Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Downunder..
- Posts
- 2,612
Maybe you can wait for Joe to comment again
-
07-13-2002, 06:52 PM #5Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- New York
- Posts
- 285
We currently have 1 server with webreseller planning on getting more as soon as this whole thing is solved. Right now both datacenters are close from each other so what is been done is that both datacenters are networked together until the move is complete that is why we don't need to change IP's. Everything should be solved by this week. About my server we did expecienced heavy packet loss yesterday but after 10pm everything came back to normal as I have been told there should be no packet loss at this time. If I was you I will submit a ticket. With some ping results.
WCSWEB.NETWORKS - 24x7 Support We're here to help anytime, day or night!
WCSHOST.Net <- Call us (800) 590-0017 ->
Linux based Cpanel Shared and Reseller premium Hosting with Fantastico & rvskin
Windows based Helm Shared Premium Hosting / Remote Backup solutions
-
07-13-2002, 08:20 PM #6Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 1,262
they called me and told me tuesday everything will be totally back to normal
i was'nt here when they called so they sent me an email too .
guess they called because i submitted a TT.
but yes my server has almost no PL right now but yesterday there was a ton.
can't wait until it gets back to the norm.
and my server has'nt been moved yet either as its same uptime.
-
07-14-2002, 03:16 AM #7Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Posts
- 2,120
well, looks ok at my end (I tried a couple of times, not monitoring all the time)
-
07-14-2002, 07:48 AM #8Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2001
- Posts
- 960
Could you please try to download from uu.net and post your result?
Here's the result from my server at Webreseller:
wget ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z
11:20:08 (204.52 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]
It was used to be about 4-5 MB/s before and I hope they would fix it by Tuesday.
-
07-14-2002, 08:09 AM #9Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 1,262
Originally posted by twrs
Could you please try to download from uu.net and post your result?
Here's the result from my server at Webreseller:
wget ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z
11:20:08 (204.52 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]
It was used to be about 4-5 MB/s before and I hope they would fix it by Tuesday.
although its not the usual 4-5 its still quick
-
07-14-2002, 08:13 AM #10Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- New York
- Posts
- 285
Its getting there
09:08:27 (3.98 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]WCSWEB.NETWORKS - 24x7 Support We're here to help anytime, day or night!
WCSHOST.Net <- Call us (800) 590-0017 ->
Linux based Cpanel Shared and Reseller premium Hosting with Fantastico & rvskin
Windows based Helm Shared Premium Hosting / Remote Backup solutions
-
07-14-2002, 08:15 AM #11Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 1,262
Originally posted by WCSWEB
Its getting there
09:08:27 (3.98 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]
-
07-14-2002, 11:46 AM #12Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2001
- Posts
- 960
That's weird. I just tried again with even worse result:
12:38:49 (182.13 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]
If we're on the same network, how could the speed be different???
-
07-14-2002, 01:22 PM #13WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Aug 2000
- Posts
- 111
I just tried with my server:
20:15:39 (86.30 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved [8520221]
I guess they still need to fine tune the connection a 'little' ... Far from the 4 MB/s + we're used to seeing...
Download speed seems to be great, though...
-
07-14-2002, 01:57 PM #14Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Posts
- 2,120
maybe your bandwidth us capped?
-
07-14-2002, 01:58 PM #15Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 1,262
13:53:36 (3.34 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]
mines doing fine
and mine has'nt been moved its still got the same uptime how about you guys have you been moved yet?
-
07-14-2002, 02:46 PM #16Disabled
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 25
ncftpget ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z
uumap.tar.Z: 8.13 MB 151.09 kB/s
-
07-14-2002, 02:48 PM #17WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Aug 2000
- Posts
- 111
No, mine hasn't been moved yet.
-
07-14-2002, 02:51 PM #18Nerf Herder
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Internet / Colorado
- Posts
- 1,660
mine hasn't been moved yet either
uumap.tar.Z: 8.13 MB 145.60 kB/sLike passive recurring revenue you can retire on?
You focus on building your brand, we handle all support, billing, and more.
Pressed.net - Start your own Managed WordPress Hosting Company
-
07-14-2002, 03:17 PM #19Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 1,262
wierd why if both my server and yours hasnt moved yet would mine be running fine and yours not?
maybe different switches or somthing?
-
07-14-2002, 03:26 PM #20Nerf Herder
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Internet / Colorado
- Posts
- 1,660
heh, i have no idea, i wish they would give us an update on whats going on
Like passive recurring revenue you can retire on?
You focus on building your brand, we handle all support, billing, and more.
Pressed.net - Start your own Managed WordPress Hosting Company
-
07-14-2002, 03:43 PM #21Disabled
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 25
Im not moved either..
Is anyone on this board moved?
-
07-14-2002, 04:52 PM #22Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 1,211
I don't think that they have moved any of the servers as of yet, as they were preparing the network switch. I wish however, that they would notify us when they do in fact intend to move the servers so we can in turn notify our clients of the downtime in advance.
Here are my results
14:45:42 (113.90 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]
-Stevenhttps://www.ihnetworks.com
BGP Blend of Telia, GTT, Zayo, and Tata in One Wilshire, Los Angeles! Enterprise Datacenters around the world, including Amsterdam, Singapore, London, and the United States.
True Definition of Managed Hosting
Proudly Offering Shared Hosting, Reseller Hosting, VPS, Dedicated Servers, and Co-location
-
07-14-2002, 06:31 PM #23Newbie
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA
- Posts
- 19
Update on the move
Hello,
The server move did begin as originally scheduled on Saturday June 29th. We have moved hundreds of servers and only have a couple hundred left to move. There will be many inconsistencies in the download performance on all servers until the move is finalized. We are aiming for Tues. or Wed. of this week to have the move finalized. After this point the network will be back to normal operations. We apologize for the inconvenience that this move has caused, but would like to assure you that we don't plan on moving again.
To give you a brief run down of our continued plan of action, the first things to get moved on Monday will be the remaining IBM x300 series servers. We will then continue with the remaining Multitenant servers (the reseller VPS accounts). Then will then leave us with only the P4 servers and a few of the P3 specials. I hope this update helps to answer any questions that you may have.
-Paul Rice
CTO- WebReseller.Net
-
07-14-2002, 06:57 PM #24Nerf Herder
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Internet / Colorado
- Posts
- 1,660
ok great!! Thanks for the update!! that is very good news to hear!
Like passive recurring revenue you can retire on?
You focus on building your brand, we handle all support, billing, and more.
Pressed.net - Start your own Managed WordPress Hosting Company
-
07-14-2002, 08:33 PM #25Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Posts
- 1,262
yes it is
so any et on how long a server will be down once its taken offline?
hopefully 10-15 mins max?
thanks for the update btw.