
05-03-2007, 09:51 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hanoi
Posts: 4,292
|
|
dual opteron 252 or core2duo E6400
Which one do you prefer?
- dual opteron 252 / 2GB RAM DDR / 15K rpm SCSI disk
- core2duo E6400 / 2GB RAM DDR2 / raid-1 sata (raid-edition) disks
It will be used for a big vBulletin forum. Price is around $200 different, core2duo a bit more expensive. Please share your idea
thanks,
__________________
Clustered CloudLinux Hosting | WordPress Hosting | Advanced Antispam | Managed Xen VPS
in US West coast and Asia datacenters with Asia-Pacific friendly networks
Free migration to our servers. Contact us now on Twitter @vietnap
|

05-03-2007, 09:54 PM
|
|
Performance Specialist
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 10,349
|
|
I'd take the Dual Opteron due to the SCSI disk. It seems as if it may offer more value in this case, especially since it is the cheaper box.
Last edited by layer0; 05-03-2007 at 10:04 PM.
|

05-03-2007, 10:30 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,289
|
|
dual opteron 252 / 2GB RAM DDR / 15K rpm SCSI disk
add another hard drive and do raid 0... it will be a lot faster for any sites with heavy mysql.
__________________
P4HOST.COM -- Specialize in quality Web Hosting solutions.
Affordable -- Prices are very comparative
Reliable -- Very low load average guaranteed. 60 day money back. Fast Support -- Support Forum -- Providing hosting since 2003
|

05-03-2007, 10:38 PM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 154
|
|
dual opteron obviously. 
|

05-03-2007, 11:30 PM
|
|
COLOCATE LIKE A BOSS
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 5,534
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by inteltechs
dual opteron 252 / 2GB RAM DDR / 15K rpm SCSI disk
add another hard drive and do raid 0... it will be a lot faster for any sites with heavy mysql.
|
DO NOT do raid-0, thats like pointing a loaded gun with a hair trigger at your data
__________________
Ryan DiRocco
██ COLO@ Colocation. Perfected.
██ Atlanta - Chicago - Dallas - Phoenix - Clifton - Los Angeles
Total Server Solutions - Servers - US Based Support - Server Management
|

05-03-2007, 11:36 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 802
|
|
Lets say these machines had the same hds in them...which processor would win?
|

05-04-2007, 12:30 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 733
|
|
against the E6400? I'd say the 252 opteron's.
|

05-04-2007, 07:23 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,648
|
|
nowadays, e6600 costs only ~$50 more than e6400, then you can get dual 2.4G cores and 2M L2 per core. I will think the raw power of dual 2.4G conroe cores will outperforms dual op252 on DB/forum apps.
there is no reason why you can't put 15K SCSI drive on conroe server. also, conroe platform will draws at least 1amp/110v less than dual 252.
|

05-04-2007, 07:31 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Guru
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 307
|
|
But putting 15K SCSI into conroe server will take me lot of money. Currently, E6400 is more than $200 already. Adding another $50 for E660, is it worth to get it? $250 difference!
__________________
Traditional music traveling
|

05-04-2007, 11:15 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,648
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by linktome
But putting 15K SCSI into conroe server will take me lot of money. Currently, E6400 is more than $200 already. Adding another $50 for E660, is it worth to get it? $250 difference!
|
I'm a bit puzzled. how comes a dual op252 1U server with 15K SCSI can be cheaper?! by my calculation, it should be a few hundreds higher than E6400 1U server with SATA RAID1.
|

05-05-2007, 02:24 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 733
|
|
I'm guessing that the provider already rented the 252 machine out for a bit, lost the client and is trying to recoup some costs by renting it out cheap?
E6600 is a great cpu...
|

05-05-2007, 01:33 PM
|
|
Managed Hosting Expert
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 4,163
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WireSix
DO NOT do raid-0, thats like pointing a loaded gun with a hair trigger at your data
|
Seconded.
The Opteron will easily outperform here IMHO on both CPU alone and CPU + I/O.
Dan
__________________
█ Dan Kitchen | Technical Director | Razorblue
█ ddi: (+44) (0)1748 900 680 | e: dkitchen@razorblue.com
█ UK Intensive Managed Hosting, Clusters and Colocation.
█ HP Servers, Cisco/Juniper Powered BGP Network (AS15692).
|

05-05-2007, 02:32 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Evangelist
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 483
|
|
I'm a huge fan of the new Xeon processors and SCSI hard drives. In this case, I think you should go with the dual Opteron, especially considering it is cheaper.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
| Postbit Selector |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Login: |
|
|
| Advertisement: |
|
|
| Web Hosting News: |
|
|
|