hosted by liquidweb

Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : Specialty Hosting and Markets : VOIP etc : VOIP reviews/rants

Forum Jump

VOIP reviews/rants

Reply Post New Thread In VOIP etc Subscription
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
WHT Addict
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 123

VOIP reviews/rants

I've been checking out some voip networks:, inphonex,, and

Here's how I break it down:

Inphonex: Good luck working any kind of custom deal with inphonex. They refuse to allow you to spoof, or to set your callerid to anything that isn't a dummy number that they own. You can only attach the number of your DID to 1 of your virtual lines. It's amazing that they actually have businesses on board when they only have DIDs with two voip channels.

No asterisk support and no insights beyond what was available on the website.

PING ( 56 data bytes
64 bytes from icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=80.758 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=81.133 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=93.139 ms
64 bytes from icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=84.449 ms
--- ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 80.758/84.870/93.139/4.986 ms
You see that inphonex? It's called a ping. Quit telling your users that your SIP server doesn't respond to pings.

The SIP proxy server no longer accepts or returns ICMP packets. This is normal and does not indicate that the service is down. The sales people at Packet 8 have no clue what a channel is. I tried using the "virtual line" terminology to no avail. They don't have any prepay plans which is important for those of us who will use the service until the provider terminates us. I also wanted a prepay plan because I wanted more than one channel. They still don't understand. I'm starting to wonder if packet 8 is run as a real company. Generally knowledgeable. It took longer, and it was often unpredictable, for a call to go through. I assume this is because of their routing scheme. The interface for placing calls was less cryptic than and more usable than Inphonex. Complete opposite of the others. This service is clearly for expert users. After a few back and forth replies tech support stops. Sometimes you won't even get a response back.

I did have an issue where connecting to a box on the server beach network was failing. Server Beach took about 1week+ to resolve the issue and denied that the issue was there all along, despite the fact that it was replicable. The point of contention was that Server Beach refuses to talk to anyone about their network without a customer paying for a premium price for a trouble ticket.

Sponsored Links

Related posts from
Title Type Date Posted
US Phone Customers Move from Incumbent Carriers to VoIP: FCC Report Web Hosting News 2014-07-21 17:19:53
Otelco Acquires Maine Web Hosting Provider Reliable Networks to Grow VoIP, Managed Services Web Hosting News 2014-01-06 11:46:12
Telefonica-Owned VoIP Service Jajah to Shut Down in January Web Hosting News 2013-12-02 13:33:15
Vonage Acquires VoIP Services Provider Vocalocity for $130M Web Hosting News 2013-10-11 10:46:29
8x8 VoIP Service Adds HIPAA, HITECH Compliance Web Hosting News 2013-05-08 12:10:54

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Log in with your username and password

Forgot Password?
WHT Host Brief Email:

We respect your privacy. We will never sell, rent, or give away your address to any outside party, ever.

Web Hosting News:
WHT Membership
WHT Membership



Welcome to

Create your username to jump into the discussion! is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.

(4 digit year)

Already a member?