hosted by liquidweb


Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : Dedicated Server : Number of people using Colo vs Dedicated
Reply

Forum Jump

Number of people using Colo vs Dedicated

View Poll Results: Colo vs Dedicated
I co-locate more than 5 servers 15 44.12%
I co-locate less than 5 servers 9 26.47%
I have more than 5 dedicated servers 7 20.59%
I have less than 5 dedicated servers 12 35.29%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Post New Thread In Dedicated Server Subscription
 
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-13-2007, 03:03 PM
x86brandon x86brandon is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 947

Number of people using Colo vs Dedicated


There have been a number of discussions recently about co-locate vs dedicated.

Got me thinking, how many of you co-locate? How many of you are using dedicated servers?

__________________
I <3 Linux Clusters

Reply With Quote


Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 04-13-2007, 03:52 PM
Archbob Archbob is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 755
Dedicated, 1 server. COLO lacks support.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-13-2007, 04:04 PM
RayWomack RayWomack is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,833
People that generally colocate have over 5 boxes. You have to be either a volume customer or a custom high-end build type client to make sense to do it.

But, colocation is a good way to start your own business.

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #4  
Old 04-13-2007, 04:11 PM
Chris_M Chris_M is online now
Community Liaison
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,601
I have 5 dedicated boxes and 2 colo boxes (all in the same rack).
Its a nice little mix for me and works out really well.

__________________
WebNX.com - Professional Hosting Solutions Premium Los Angeles Servers and Colo
Quality Dedicated Servers in Los Angeles From single core to 64 core servers 2GB ram to 512GB Ram
1 hard drive to 45+ drive setups. sales @ webnx.com

Facebook only Specials https://www.facebook.com/WebNX


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-13-2007, 04:12 PM
DeltaAnime DeltaAnime is offline
Poooooonnyyy :*
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,337
It depends how costly the box is.

For our higher end boxes, it was cheaper by a long shot to simply just buy the boxes and the colocate them (cost was down by over 50%), so we did that.

For $50 boxes that we use for IRC and the likes we see no reason, so we just rent them.

~Francisco

__________________
BuyVM - OpenVZ & KVM Based VPS Servers - Chat with us
- All popular VPN methods supported
- Affordable offloaded MySQL & DDoS protection
- 5GB backup space, unmetered private LAN bandwidth & native IPv6 included. All with a strong serving of pony

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-13-2007, 04:19 PM
RayWomack RayWomack is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,833
We do something similar. When we know up front that a guy is going to be a 2,000, 3,000 or 4,000 GB customer we send them lease them over to our completion so it will be a GUARANTEED LOSS for them and a PROFITABLE ACCOUNT for us.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-13-2007, 05:10 PM
ikeo ikeo is offline
Junior Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 203
I started with 1 colocated server and a couple of dedicated servers. Now we have a couple dozen server all colocated and we're phazing out the dedicated stuff. Dedicated makes sense to test the market to see if you can make a profit with the business. Once ya start making money though and have staff, colocation offers better visibility into overall network management and its cheaper to run high end equipment via colocation. In dedicated scenario you pay ~400 / mo for a high end box and in 10mo. you could've built it with that same pricing.

__________________
Share Camera phone pictures & video in Real-Time
www.flukiest.com
Buy, Sell, & Trade Internet Traffic
http://www.etology.com

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-13-2007, 05:46 PM
peruviantalk peruviantalk is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,634
I have one colo server and I am not really sure how many servers I got honestly there is just too many

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-13-2007, 06:17 PM
Chrysalis Chrysalis is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,031
I always buy dedicated mainly due to the fact I dont live near a datacentre, but with dedicated I have found you are subject to the datacentre using bad low quality hardware.

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-13-2007, 07:33 PM
ATLDedicated ATLDedicated is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,025
Colo all the way!

I many of the businesses on WHT would not be possible without colo as a cost effective solution for hosting large amounts of hardware.

__________________
Matt Armour
OpenReaction

Reply With Quote
Reply

Related posts from TheWhir.com
Title Type Date Posted
DL Host Listing 2014-07-24 10:27:24
DL Host Listing 2014-07-24 10:27:24
DL Host Listing 2014-07-24 10:27:24
DL Host Listing 2014-07-24 10:26:36
Colocation America Launches Colocation Service for Mac Mini Users Web Hosting News 2013-02-27 16:42:41


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Login:
Log in with your username and password
Username:
Password:



Forgot Password?
Advertisement:
Web Hosting News:



 

X

Welcome to WebHostingTalk.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

WebHostingTalk.com is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?