What's the Difference Between Unix and Windows Web Hosting?

MikeyMells · #1 02-04-2007, 07:38 AM

So you're finally ready to publish your finished website and you're searching through the myriad of web hosting plans and providers. You may have noticed that most hosting companies use Linux or Unix operating systems on their web servers. Microsoft Windows is less commonly offered as a choice. So what's the difference?

Most people are familiar with Microsoft Windows having used it at home, work, or at school. It is very easy to use for novices and it doesn't require command-line knowledge. In Windows Home and advanced Server editions, you can simply point and click your way to a different folder using your mouse. Unix and Linux are open-source - meaning that the operating system is free and the source code is well documented and easily distributed. There are no major differences between Unix and Linux. Unix is much older and cannot run on x86-based personal computers (like the one you're using now). In contrast, Linux can run on both high-powered servers and x86-based computers.

Linux is available in many flavors, though most hosting companies use Red Hat Linux, or Mandrake Linux, which are proven workhorses able to handle hundreds of websites and millions of hits per day. FreeBSD and OpenBSD are versions of Unix which are also available. While ease-of-use is very important for a home or work computer, it is generally not a big issue when working with a web server. After all, you are doing most of your website design offline on your own computer. Unless you have very advanced programming or operating system-specific modules, you will not notice the difference between Windows and Unix servers.

Both Linux/Unix and Windows can handle high traffic websites and add-ons such as chat rooms, email and website statistics with ease. The biggest differences are price and software compatibility. Because Windows must be purchased and licenses renewed continuously, Windows hosting plans are usually more expensive than Unix-based plans. Also Unix-based plans often come with free email, databases (MySQL), statistic, and community programs. While Windows plans come with Microsoft software (MS SQL, for example) that must be purchased by the hosting company.

Both Linux and Windows platforms can run popular programming languages such as php, perl, or java. If your website uses active server pages, then it will be less risky hosting it on a Windows server. Well it still may function on a Unix server, there may be small glitches that are not immediately apparent. Similarly, if you are using with Microsoft SQL databases, these databases will be supported by most Windows plans. However, Linux or Unix plans often include MySQL which would require that your databases be converted to this format in order to function properly. If you are currently using any Microsoft programming (especially active server pages) or third-party applications (MS SQL 2000), you may want to play it safe and choose a Windows hosting plan.

From the average web designer's standpoint, there isn't much difference between hosting on Linux/Unix or Windows web servers. However, before signing up for a hosting plan, ensure that all facets of your site's design, programming, databases and the like will work with that plan. If you are unsure, ask the company's sales or technical staff before you commit.

lorem ipsum · #2 02-05-2007, 06:28 AM

Well, I really like Debian among all the rest of Linux distributions, as it has the package manager, you type apt-get install package, and debian will download and install that package for you.

lightasair · #3 02-28-2007, 01:01 AM

Can you run MySQL on a Windows server?

tanfwc · #4 02-28-2007, 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lightasair

Can you run MySQL on a Windows server?

Yes, MySQL is supported on Windows platform as well

dm_fw · #5 02-28-2007, 06:54 PM

I somewhat disagree about the design aspect. If you want to design a site with complex backend logic, then base ASP.net 2.x has an advantage over base PHP.

However, does a host provider need to pay a repeat fee for use MS Sql or Server 2003? If so, what are these fees?

gophp · #6 06-22-2007, 04:06 PM

I would like to add one important point: UNIX/Linux hosting plans often come with SSH (command line) access, and this is standard on VPS and "higher" plans. Command line access can be a big advantage if you (a webmaster) use dial-up Internet connection (for example, when travelling).

sussane · #7 09-26-2007, 12:14 AM

guys,
I made quota of 10mb to internet guest account(asp user) on windows 2003. Is it some security risk ?

calvynlee · #8 10-11-2007, 01:13 PM

thank for your tips, i just wonder to install a windows server 2003 in to my PC and test run with hosting environment

so to linux too, but i am not familiar with linux, it take time for me to research, any one can come out a topic on the DIY hosting server?

xpg5555 · #9 10-13-2007, 09:54 PM

thanks!guys!this article make me know more about Unix and Windows Web Hosting,i'll choose unix hosting next time!

flaviorodrigues · #10 11-17-2007, 03:27 PM

the best is that unix is open source

geekisp · #11 11-20-2007, 03:29 AM

I found windows to be less reliable across higher bandwidth sites or servers with alot of sites

supportmatrix · #12 12-29-2007, 12:48 PM

I will go for a Unix hosting. I think Unix is more reliable than windows in all means.

mikevasquez · #13 01-25-2008, 03:41 AM

Oh I personally experienced it first hand how fast Linux servers are over Windows. Most of our issues are coming from our Windows hosting accounts. Windows is slower and less stable for me.