var sidebar_align = 'right';
var content_container_margin = parseInt('350px');
var sidebar_width = parseInt('330px');
Where did this email originate from?
Can anyone tell me where this email originated from?
It's confusing the way Cpanel sets Exim headers.
It is either:
>Return-Path: <[email protected] >
>Delivered-To: [email protected]
>Received: from psmtp.com ( exprod5mx148.postini.com [ 18.104.22.168])
> by mx1.nap.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 02C411975D1
> for < [email protected]>; Sat, 4 Nov 2006 09:22:49 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from source ([22.214.171.124 ]) (using TLSv1) by
>exprod5mx148.postini.com ([126.96.36.199 ]) with SMTP;
> Sat, 04 Nov 2006 10:09:48 MST
>Received: from [ 188.8.131.52] (helo= dsl85-102-53202.ttnet.net.tr )
> by ron.johnsmith.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
> id 1GgOyJ-00068J-4x
> for [email protected]; Sat, 04
> Nov 2006 12:05:57 -0500
>Received : from 184.108.40.206 (HELO pop3.camsocanon.com )
> by business.com with esmtp (UMT4Z5Y7P1F 5SXQF)
> id B4V4JN-8EQRS0-I6
> for [email protected]; Sat, 4 Nov
> 2006 17:06:18 -0120
>From : "Savannah Rouse" <[email protected] >
>To: < [email protected]>
>Subject: hi john.
>Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 17:06:18 -0120
>Message-ID: <[email protected] >
>X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
>X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it
>with any abuse report
>X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ron.johnsmith.com
>X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - business.com
>X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
>X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camsocanon.com
>X-pstn-levels: (S: 7.03902/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108
>M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
>X-pstn-settings: 5 (2.0000:2.0000) s gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
>X-pstn-addresses: from <[email protected] > [3825/162]
The email most likely 'originated' from dsl85-102-53202.ttnet.net.tr (220.127.116.11).
Actually I might have been wrong when I named the 3 choices.
I had another tech it was sent from: 18.104.22.168
Can anyone else weigh in on this?