Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 57

Thread: Download Speeds

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    892

    Download Speeds

    What sort of download speeds do you get to your server. (ie downloading a file from a remote location to your server. ftp, wget...)

    My speeds are usually between 130-220K/s; slower than I would expect from a dedicated server.

    Is it slow? I have nothing to compare it to- what sort of speeds do you all experience?

    thanks for any input.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    180
    It really all depends on the connection that you have at your location there. The dedicated server could be on a 100mbit connection, but your cable provider probably caps you at 1.5mbps which equals approx 180K per sec.

    It's really hard to test unless your on a fast connection. For instance I am on a 5mbit adsl line and always max out on my server at approx 580k per sec.

    So if you would like I can test your box speed, drop me a e-mail if you would like..

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    892
    Thanks, Goose. I am not speaking of downloading a file from my server to my home computer.

    I am speaking of downloading a file with my server; No home connection is involved. (My home connection is 28.8 so downloading with it is pretty well useless.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    848
    RackShack Server Speed Incoming:
    wget ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z
    02:25:15 (764.26 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221/8520221]

    RackShack Server Speed Outgoing:
    wget http://mydomain.com/temp/uumap.tar.Z
    02:28:37 (556.78 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221/8520221]

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    746
    4150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 50% @ 649.35 KB/s
    4200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 51% @ 505.05 KB/s
    4250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 51% @ 549.45 KB/s
    4300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 52% @ 568.18 KB/s
    4350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 52% @ 641.03 KB/s
    4400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 53% @ 602.41 KB/s
    4450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 54% @ 549.45 KB/s
    4500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 54% @ 403.23 KB/s
    4550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 55% @ 526.32 KB/s
    4600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 55% @ 1.11 MB/s
    4650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 56% @ 561.80 KB/s
    4700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 57% @ 450.45 KB/s
    4750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 57% @ 568.18 KB/s
    4800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 58% @ 480.77 KB/s
    4850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 58% @ 1.11 MB/s
    4900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 59% @ 510.20 KB/s
    4950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 60% @ 467.29 KB/s
    5000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 60% @ 574.71 KB/s
    5050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 61% @ 490.20 KB/s
    5100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 61% @ 1.09 MB/s
    5150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 62% @ 495.05 KB/s
    5200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 63% @ 480.77 KB/s
    5250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 63% @ 595.24 KB/s
    5300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 64% @ 485.44 KB/s
    5350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 64% @ 1.11 MB/s
    5400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 65% @ 490.20 KB/s
    5450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 66% @ 490.20 KB/s
    5500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 66% @ 568.18 KB/s
    5550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 67% @ 515.46 KB/s
    5600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 67% @ 980.39 KB/s
    5650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 68% @ 505.05 KB/s
    5700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 69% @ 490.20 KB/s
    5750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 69% @ 561.80 KB/s
    5800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 70% @ 520.83 KB/s
    5850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 70% @ 961.54 KB/s
    5900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 71% @ 515.46 KB/s
    5950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 72% @ 490.20 KB/s
    6000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 72% @ 537.63 KB/s
    6050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 73% @ 555.56 KB/s
    6100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 73% @ 793.65 KB/s
    6150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 74% @ 561.80 KB/s
    6200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 75% @ 500.00 KB/s
    6250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 75% @ 537.63 KB/s
    6300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 76% @ 549.45 KB/s
    6350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 76% @ 769.23 KB/s
    6400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 77% @ 5.96 KB/s
    6450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 78% @ 151.52 KB/s
    6500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 78% @ 438.60 KB/s
    6550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 79% @ 471.70 KB/s
    6600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 79% @ 476.19 KB/s
    6650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 80% @ 480.77 KB/s
    6700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 81% @ 1.58 MB/s
    6750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 81% @ 543.48 KB/s
    6800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 82% @ 480.77 KB/s
    6850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 82% @ 476.19 KB/s
    6900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 83% @ 1.63 MB/s
    6950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 84% @ 476.19 KB/s
    7000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 84% @ 480.77 KB/s
    7050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 85% @ 515.46 KB/s
    7100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 85% @ 495.05 KB/s
    7150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 86% @ 1.63 MB/s
    7200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 87% @ 467.29 KB/s
    7250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 87% @ 495.05 KB/s
    7300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 88% @ 500.00 KB/s
    7350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 88% @ 520.83 KB/s
    7400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 89% @ 1.40 MB/s
    7450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 90% @ 485.44 KB/s
    7500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 90% @ 500.00 KB/s
    7550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 91% @ 505.05 KB/s
    7600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 91% @ 520.83 KB/s
    7650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 92% @ 4.55 KB/s
    7700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% @ 442.48 KB/s
    7750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% @ 4.07 MB/s
    7800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% @ 458.72 KB/s
    7850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% @ 471.70 KB/s
    7900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 95% @ 471.70 KB/s
    7950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% @ 495.05 KB/s
    8000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% @ 2.44 MB/s
    8050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% @ 467.29 KB/s
    8100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% @ 476.19 KB/s
    8150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 98% @ 490.20 KB/s
    8200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% @ 480.77 KB/s
    8250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% @ 2.03 MB/s
    8300K .......... .......... 100% @ 233.28 KB/s

    23:56:58 (240.82 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

  6. #6
    Off of my T3 at work...

    wget ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z
    22:47:19 (399.86 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    746
    Hmm, is there a way to check max throughput of my Cogent line?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    892
    Why is my speed so slow compared to all of yours.

    I'm at exodus.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    746
    Hmm, maybe you should try again. Isn't exodus a ton more expensive than Cogent?

    Hmm, my numbers not always the same. Is there a way to do it ten times and get the average?

    7650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 92% @ 495.05 KB/s
    7700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% @ 485.44 KB/s
    7750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% @ 450.45 KB/s
    7800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% @ 500.00 KB/s
    7850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% @ 1.81 MB/s
    7900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 95% @ 476.19 KB/s
    7950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% @ 495.05 KB/s
    8000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% @ 480.77 KB/s
    8050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% @ 526.32 KB/s
    8100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% @ 1.32 MB/s
    8150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 98% @ 471.70 KB/s
    8200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% @ 27.50 KB/s
    8250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% @ 48.83 MB/s
    8300K .......... .......... 100% @ 93.31 KB/s

    00:13:14 (432.19 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]


    7600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 91% @ 531.91 KB/s
    7650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 92% @ 480.77 KB/s
    7700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% @ 543.48 KB/s
    7750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% @ 555.56 KB/s
    7800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% @ 781.25 KB/s
    7850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% @ 581.40 KB/s
    7900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 95% @ 490.20 KB/s
    7950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% @ 549.45 KB/s
    8000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% @ 537.63 KB/s
    8050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% @ 769.23 KB/s
    8100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% @ 574.71 KB/s
    8150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 98% @ 495.05 KB/s
    8200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% @ 543.48 KB/s
    8250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% @ 561.80 KB/s
    8300K .......... .......... 100% @ 641.51 KB/s

    00:14:17 (401.12 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved [8520221]

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    892
    i tried the uumap.tar.z and experienced better speeds ~450K/s

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    1,048
    e-servers
    07:03:53 (1.14 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

    rackshack
    20:59:50 (765.67 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

    fdcservers

    06:03:51 (893.43 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

    I really should set the time properly

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    1,048
    Here is some interesting results;

    fdcservers to rackshack

    21:10:47 (24.46 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved [8520221/8520221]


    fdcservers to e-servers

    07:15:47 (21.00 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved [8520221/8520221]


    e-servers to rackshack

    21:12:45 (938.79 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.2' saved [8520221/8520221]


    e-servers to fdcservers

    06:16:45 (669.55 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved [8520221/8520221]


    rackshack to e-servers

    07:18:51 (1.78 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.2' saved [8520221/8520221]


    rackshack to fdcservers

    06:18:14 (1.87 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.2' saved [8520221/8520221]

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    323
    fdcservers to rackshack
    21:10:47 (24.46 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved
    fdcservers to e-servers
    07:15:47 (21.00 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved
    e-servers to fdcservers
    06:16:45 (669.55 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved
    rackshack to fdcservers
    06:18:14 (1.87 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.2' saved
    Hmmm... this seems to confirm what was said elsewhere... fdc servers seem to be fast either coming in or going out. Never both.

    Rackshack & eservers both seem stable, and quick enough. That test was done in the morning?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    1,048
    done about 30 mins prior to you replying to post

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Silver Spring, Maryland
    Posts
    256
    From an OC3 in LA:
    (10:56:05 <~>) 0 $ wget ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z
    --10:56:08-- ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z
    => `uumap.tar.Z'
    Resolving ftp.uu.net... done.
    Connecting to ftp.uu.net[192.48.96.9]:21... connected.
    Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
    ==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.
    ==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD not needed.
    ==> PORT ... done. ==> RETR uumap.tar.Z ... done.
    Length: 8,520,221 (unauthoritative)

    100%[====================================================================================================================>] 8,520,221 665.16K/s ETA 00:00

    10:56:25 (665.16 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]
    Then w/ fetch a minute or so later:
    (10:58:19 <~>) 0 $ fetch ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z
    Receiving uumap.tar.Z (8520221 bytes): 100%
    8520221 bytes transferred in 11.0 seconds (759.66 kBps)
    I don't think the speed difference had anything to do with which program I used, I just tried using both for the hell of it When the server I just ordered from Webreseller.net gets setup I'll try it from there too.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    280

    I feel the power!!!

    From webreseller to uunet

    14:00:16 (4.71 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

    From webreseller to pair

    14:01:44 (1.03 MB/s) - `test.rar' saved [30918892/30918892]

    From webreseller to Nac

    14:14:34 (1.33 MB/s) - `test.rar' saved [6457597/6457597]

    I will get more boxes later time for lunch ...
    WCSWEB.NETWORKS - 24x7 Support We're here to help anytime, day or night!
    WCSHOST.Net <- Call us (800) 590-0017 ->
    Linux based Cpanel Shared and Reseller premium Hosting with Fantastico & rvskin
    Windows based Helm Shared Premium Hosting / Remote Backup solutions

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    PA, USA
    Posts
    5,137
    Downloading ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z

    Code:
    8520221 bytes received in 2.54 seconds (3.19 MB/s)
    Hm... that makes me the 2nd fastest so far ... and it's 4:15 pm EST ... But considering I'm further away to ftp.uu.net than webreseller is, I consider myself still faster

    regards,
    -dave
    Fluid Hosting, LLC - HSphere Shared and Reseller hosting - Now with HIGH AVAILABILITY
    Fluid VPS - Linux and Windows Virtuozzo VPS - Enterprise VPS with up to 2 GB guaranteed memory!
    Get your N+1 High Availability Enterprise Cloud
    Equinix Secaucus NY2 (NYC Metro)

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    960
    Same here from my Webreseller server to UUNet:

    16:17:28 (4.66 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    892
    I am a little disappointed with my results, but I suppose there is not a lot i can do about it.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    124
    Originally posted by prime


    Hmmm... this seems to confirm what was said elsewhere... fdc servers seem to be fast either coming in or going out. Never both.

    Rackshack & eservers both seem stable, and quick enough. That test was done in the morning?
    Oh man... that's really really bad... you're saying that fdcservers are something like : 10Mbit / 256Kbps speed !! ?? ...
    If you get 256Kbps for upload... it's bad... but no sooo sooo bad... but what if you get 256Kbps for download??????? I mean... your clients will upload to server at 1Mb/seg. and all the world will download from the server at 25Kb/seg ?? ... BAD BAD BAD....

    Can someone please "expand" about this issue...
    I'm buying a server in the next 2 weeks... and...hrm.... I was thinking in fdcservers.... but now.....

    I dunno... maybe will go to eservers (at 40 usd more...)
    or RS ... if I can get a no setup server... (my budget is reduced... )

    Anyway.
    Thanks in advance.
    CAS Networks SL | Businesss Solutions Provider
    -> www.cascompany.com, IT Related B2B since 1997.
    -> Premium Dedicated Servers & Private Reseller Accounts
    -> Web Design, Corporate Image Design, Graphic Design

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Silver Spring, Maryland
    Posts
    256
    Good to hear webreseller is quick! I just ordered a box from them, because, from what I could tell, they're the quickest for their prices, at least on the east coast. (For what I'm doing I need lots of speed )

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    77
    uunet to fdc
    18:09:15 (569.28 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]
    ----------------------------------------------------
    uunet to rackshack
    ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z

    File Size = 8320K
    Total bytes received = 8320.5K (100.00%)
    Current speed = 6103.57Kb/s, Average D/L speed = 4160.26Kb/s
    Time remaining 0 seconds

    Resume Supported
    Up and Down Arrow keys to scroll display
    Ctrl-R to exit and resume later
    Ctrl-X to exit without resuming later
    Ctrl-L to repaint the screen

    Deleting the unwanted files
    ----------------------------------------------------
    fdc to rackshack
    680 KB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------
    rackshack to fdc
    18:15:01 (1.53 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221/8520221]


    fdc is on basic service so on 10 mbit camed port with few other servers

    i would say pretty good

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    chicago
    Posts
    717
    as far as I know there`ve been couple customers with VERY slow upload speeds but those problems are hardware related as they opted for our lowend boxes which had old deffective network card.

    Even if tested on LAN their upload speeds were 20-30Kb .....]





    we are currently working on replacing their machines

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    746
    How do you test the throughput of your line? I want to see if you really get 100 Mbit if you get a line from Cogent. I never really got to test this puppy.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    1,048
    Bummer,

    Mine isn't a low-end machine - wanna replace mine too?

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    chicago
    Posts
    717
    you need to email us if you have a problem we don`t monitor your speeds so I don`t how much you`re getting

    you can measure throughput with MRTG or different networking tools

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    1,048
    My speeds are overpage

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    124
    Originally posted by hosticle
    [B]Here is some interesting results;

    fdcservers to rackshack

    21:10:47 (24.46 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved [8520221/8520221]


    fdcservers to e-servers

    07:15:47 (21.00 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved [8520221/8520221]
    mm... like fdcserver to the world is even below 256Kbps....
    maybe it's only this server... maybe a lot... who knows...
    bummer... If I get a server.... what's the minimun speed I'll get ?
    UPload/DOWNload ... any guaranty on this ?

    And please... fix hosticle server ... I can get faster speed serving from my own PC

    Regards.
    CAS Networks SL | Businesss Solutions Provider
    -> www.cascompany.com, IT Related B2B since 1997.
    -> Premium Dedicated Servers & Private Reseller Accounts
    -> Web Design, Corporate Image Design, Graphic Design

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    chicago
    Posts
    717
    Originally posted by hosticle
    My speeds are overpage
    the problem is hosticle that I don`t know who you are hosticle , so please kindly contact our support with your IP adress and the problem you`re experincing and I am positive you`ll be helped promtly :-)

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    chicago
    Posts
    717
    Originally posted by cascompany


    mm... like fdcserver to the world is even below 256Kbps....
    maybe it's only this server... maybe a lot... who knows...
    bummer... If I get a server.... what's the minimun speed I'll get ?
    UPload/DOWNload ... any guaranty on this ?

    And please... fix hosticle server ... I can get faster speed serving from my own PC

    Regards.

    our clients get 1-3Mbit on averrage ...some people peaked up to 30Mbit
    monthly transffer is 600GB and more on our standard machines

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    892
    I know my users get quick speeds; I have sustained a rate of 16megabit for awhile (untill my server went offline )

    MRTG is a helpful tool and when used with php net-analyzer it is excellent
    Last edited by WoodShedd; 06-19-2002 at 01:36 AM.

  32. #32
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    323
    fdc is on basic service so on 10 mbit camed port with few other servers

    i would say pretty good
    Unfortunately, I do get an average 8% packet loss when I test, sometimes going up to 40%... even after contacting support and having some changes made

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Clifton Park, NY
    Posts
    925
    ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z

    I got from from a RackFast box

    23:36:09 (3.35 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

    -Brendan

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    2,416
    %fetch ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z
    Receiving uumap.tar.Z (8520221 bytes): 100%
    8520221 bytes transferred in 2.6 seconds (3.10 MBps)

    (I'm 13 hops away, through alternet among others, to the source. From NAC)

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    2,416
    I would be interested in seeing what transfer rates you get from this box:

    ftp://64.21.147.32/uumap.tar.Z

    servers / desktops whatever. The machine is at NAC.

    I'll leave it up for the day.

    Thanks
    “Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under
    considerable economic stress at this period in history.”

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    280
    From: ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z

    15:09:52 (4.75 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

    From: ftp://64.21.147.32/uumap.tar.Z

    15:06:21 (98.57 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

    The speed kept going up and down...
    WCSWEB.NETWORKS - 24x7 Support We're here to help anytime, day or night!
    WCSHOST.Net <- Call us (800) 590-0017 ->
    Linux based Cpanel Shared and Reseller premium Hosting with Fantastico & rvskin
    Windows based Helm Shared Premium Hosting / Remote Backup solutions

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    2,416
    Very strange. I think the port I'm on may have a cap on it and it should not. I get 3.10MBPS from uunet inbound to that machine.

    Thanks Willy... will look at this further.

    PS - was that from a server or a desktop? Never mind, I see you've done it from a server...
    “Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under
    considerable economic stress at this period in history.”

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    892
    from ftp://64.21.147.32/uumap.tar.Z 45.76K/s

    from uunet: (1.17 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved [8520221]

  39. #39
    question, anyone know how to set wget to show the speed as well as the %?

    IE:

    8150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 98% @ 495.05 KB/s
    8200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% @ 543.48 KB/s
    8250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% @ 561.80 KB/s

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    848
    Someone said you need to update wget to a newer version to get the incremental KB/s
    Dedicated Servers at Steadfast Networks and Softlayer : Virutal Hosting at FutureQuest : VPS at FutureHosting

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •