hosted by liquidweb


Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : Dedicated Server : Download Speeds
Reply

Dedicated Server Current and past experiences with dedicated server providers, bandwidth, and server performance. Review managed and unmanaged dedicated web servers, discuss both Windows and Unix dedicated server solutions, and discuss dedicated hosting providers. If your service is unavailable, please click here.
Forum Jump

Download Speeds

Reply Post New Thread In Dedicated Server Subscription
 
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-18-2002, 01:41 AM
WoodShedd WoodShedd is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 892

Download Speeds


What sort of download speeds do you get to your server. (ie downloading a file from a remote location to your server. ftp, wget...)

My speeds are usually between 130-220K/s; slower than I would expect from a dedicated server.

Is it slow? I have nothing to compare it to- what sort of speeds do you all experience?

thanks for any input.

Reply With Quote


Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 06-18-2002, 02:05 AM
Goose Goose is offline
Junior Guru
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 180
It really all depends on the connection that you have at your location there. The dedicated server could be on a 100mbit connection, but your cable provider probably caps you at 1.5mbps which equals approx 180K per sec.

It's really hard to test unless your on a fast connection. For instance I am on a 5mbit adsl line and always max out on my server at approx 580k per sec.

So if you would like I can test your box speed, drop me a e-mail if you would like..

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-18-2002, 02:24 AM
WoodShedd WoodShedd is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 892
Thanks, Goose. I am not speaking of downloading a file from my server to my home computer.

I am speaking of downloading a file with my server; No home connection is involved. (My home connection is 28.8 so downloading with it is pretty well useless.

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #4  
Old 06-18-2002, 02:38 AM
panopticon panopticon is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 848
RackShack Server Speed Incoming:
wget ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z
02:25:15 (764.26 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221/8520221]

RackShack Server Speed Outgoing:
wget http://mydomain.com/temp/uumap.tar.Z
02:28:37 (556.78 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221/8520221]

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-18-2002, 03:06 AM
ClusterMania ClusterMania is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 746
4150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 50% @ 649.35 KB/s
4200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 51% @ 505.05 KB/s
4250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 51% @ 549.45 KB/s
4300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 52% @ 568.18 KB/s
4350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 52% @ 641.03 KB/s
4400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 53% @ 602.41 KB/s
4450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 54% @ 549.45 KB/s
4500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 54% @ 403.23 KB/s
4550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 55% @ 526.32 KB/s
4600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 55% @ 1.11 MB/s
4650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 56% @ 561.80 KB/s
4700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 57% @ 450.45 KB/s
4750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 57% @ 568.18 KB/s
4800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 58% @ 480.77 KB/s
4850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 58% @ 1.11 MB/s
4900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 59% @ 510.20 KB/s
4950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 60% @ 467.29 KB/s
5000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 60% @ 574.71 KB/s
5050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 61% @ 490.20 KB/s
5100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 61% @ 1.09 MB/s
5150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 62% @ 495.05 KB/s
5200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 63% @ 480.77 KB/s
5250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 63% @ 595.24 KB/s
5300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 64% @ 485.44 KB/s
5350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 64% @ 1.11 MB/s
5400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 65% @ 490.20 KB/s
5450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 66% @ 490.20 KB/s
5500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 66% @ 568.18 KB/s
5550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 67% @ 515.46 KB/s
5600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 67% @ 980.39 KB/s
5650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 68% @ 505.05 KB/s
5700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 69% @ 490.20 KB/s
5750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 69% @ 561.80 KB/s
5800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 70% @ 520.83 KB/s
5850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 70% @ 961.54 KB/s
5900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 71% @ 515.46 KB/s
5950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 72% @ 490.20 KB/s
6000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 72% @ 537.63 KB/s
6050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 73% @ 555.56 KB/s
6100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 73% @ 793.65 KB/s
6150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 74% @ 561.80 KB/s
6200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 75% @ 500.00 KB/s
6250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 75% @ 537.63 KB/s
6300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 76% @ 549.45 KB/s
6350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 76% @ 769.23 KB/s
6400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 77% @ 5.96 KB/s
6450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 78% @ 151.52 KB/s
6500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 78% @ 438.60 KB/s
6550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 79% @ 471.70 KB/s
6600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 79% @ 476.19 KB/s
6650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 80% @ 480.77 KB/s
6700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 81% @ 1.58 MB/s
6750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 81% @ 543.48 KB/s
6800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 82% @ 480.77 KB/s
6850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 82% @ 476.19 KB/s
6900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 83% @ 1.63 MB/s
6950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 84% @ 476.19 KB/s
7000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 84% @ 480.77 KB/s
7050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 85% @ 515.46 KB/s
7100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 85% @ 495.05 KB/s
7150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 86% @ 1.63 MB/s
7200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 87% @ 467.29 KB/s
7250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 87% @ 495.05 KB/s
7300K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 88% @ 500.00 KB/s
7350K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 88% @ 520.83 KB/s
7400K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 89% @ 1.40 MB/s
7450K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 90% @ 485.44 KB/s
7500K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 90% @ 500.00 KB/s
7550K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 91% @ 505.05 KB/s
7600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 91% @ 520.83 KB/s
7650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 92% @ 4.55 KB/s
7700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% @ 442.48 KB/s
7750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% @ 4.07 MB/s
7800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% @ 458.72 KB/s
7850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% @ 471.70 KB/s
7900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 95% @ 471.70 KB/s
7950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% @ 495.05 KB/s
8000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% @ 2.44 MB/s
8050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% @ 467.29 KB/s
8100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% @ 476.19 KB/s
8150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 98% @ 490.20 KB/s
8200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% @ 480.77 KB/s
8250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% @ 2.03 MB/s
8300K .......... .......... 100% @ 233.28 KB/s

23:56:58 (240.82 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-18-2002, 03:09 AM
ARETNA ARETNA is offline
Disabled
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 103
Off of my T3 at work...

wget ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z
22:47:19 (399.86 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-18-2002, 03:12 AM
ClusterMania ClusterMania is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 746
Hmm, is there a way to check max throughput of my Cogent line?

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-18-2002, 03:17 AM
WoodShedd WoodShedd is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 892
Why is my speed so slow compared to all of yours.

I'm at exodus.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-18-2002, 03:20 AM
ClusterMania ClusterMania is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 746
Hmm, maybe you should try again. Isn't exodus a ton more expensive than Cogent?

Hmm, my numbers not always the same. Is there a way to do it ten times and get the average?

7650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 92% @ 495.05 KB/s
7700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% @ 485.44 KB/s
7750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% @ 450.45 KB/s
7800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% @ 500.00 KB/s
7850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% @ 1.81 MB/s
7900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 95% @ 476.19 KB/s
7950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% @ 495.05 KB/s
8000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% @ 480.77 KB/s
8050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% @ 526.32 KB/s
8100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% @ 1.32 MB/s
8150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 98% @ 471.70 KB/s
8200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% @ 27.50 KB/s
8250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% @ 48.83 MB/s
8300K .......... .......... 100% @ 93.31 KB/s

00:13:14 (432.19 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]


7600K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 91% @ 531.91 KB/s
7650K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 92% @ 480.77 KB/s
7700K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% @ 543.48 KB/s
7750K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 93% @ 555.56 KB/s
7800K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% @ 781.25 KB/s
7850K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 94% @ 581.40 KB/s
7900K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 95% @ 490.20 KB/s
7950K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% @ 549.45 KB/s
8000K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 96% @ 537.63 KB/s
8050K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% @ 769.23 KB/s
8100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 97% @ 574.71 KB/s
8150K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 98% @ 495.05 KB/s
8200K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% @ 543.48 KB/s
8250K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 99% @ 561.80 KB/s
8300K .......... .......... 100% @ 641.51 KB/s

00:14:17 (401.12 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved [8520221]

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-18-2002, 03:27 AM
WoodShedd WoodShedd is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 892
i tried the uumap.tar.z and experienced better speeds ~450K/s

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-18-2002, 07:12 AM
seg fault seg fault is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: AU
Posts: 1,044
e-servers
07:03:53 (1.14 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

rackshack
20:59:50 (765.67 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

fdcservers

06:03:51 (893.43 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]

I really should set the time properly

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-18-2002, 07:25 AM
seg fault seg fault is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: AU
Posts: 1,044
Here is some interesting results;

fdcservers to rackshack

21:10:47 (24.46 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved [8520221/8520221]


fdcservers to e-servers

07:15:47 (21.00 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved [8520221/8520221]


e-servers to rackshack

21:12:45 (938.79 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.2' saved [8520221/8520221]


e-servers to fdcservers

06:16:45 (669.55 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved [8520221/8520221]


rackshack to e-servers

07:18:51 (1.78 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.2' saved [8520221/8520221]


rackshack to fdcservers

06:18:14 (1.87 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.2' saved [8520221/8520221]

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-18-2002, 07:58 AM
prime prime is offline
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 323
Quote:
fdcservers to rackshack
21:10:47 (24.46 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved
fdcservers to e-servers
07:15:47 (21.00 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved
e-servers to fdcservers
06:16:45 (669.55 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.1' saved
rackshack to fdcservers
06:18:14 (1.87 MB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z.2' saved
Hmmm... this seems to confirm what was said elsewhere... fdc servers seem to be fast either coming in or going out. Never both.

Rackshack & eservers both seem stable, and quick enough. That test was done in the morning?

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-18-2002, 08:16 AM
seg fault seg fault is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: AU
Posts: 1,044
done about 30 mins prior to you replying to post

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-18-2002, 02:11 PM
no1v2 no1v2 is offline
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland
Posts: 256
From an OC3 in LA:
Quote:
(10:56:05 <~>) 0 $ wget ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z
--10:56:08-- ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z
=> `uumap.tar.Z'
Resolving ftp.uu.net... done.
Connecting to ftp.uu.net[192.48.96.9]:21... connected.
Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.
==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD not needed.
==> PORT ... done. ==> RETR uumap.tar.Z ... done.
Length: 8,520,221 (unauthoritative)

100%[====================================================================================================================>] 8,520,221 665.16K/s ETA 00:00

10:56:25 (665.16 KB/s) - `uumap.tar.Z' saved [8520221]
Then w/ fetch a minute or so later:
Quote:
(10:58:19 <~>) 0 $ fetch ftp://ftp.uu.net/uumap.tar.Z
Receiving uumap.tar.Z (8520221 bytes): 100%
8520221 bytes transferred in 11.0 seconds (759.66 kBps)
I don't think the speed difference had anything to do with which program I used, I just tried using both for the hell of it When the server I just ordered from Webreseller.net gets setup I'll try it from there too.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Related posts from TheWhir.com
Title Type Date Posted
Mega Firefox Extension Speeds Up Downloads, Removes File Size Limits Web Hosting News 2013-02-11 11:43:22
PlusServer Launches Unmetered.com Hosting Service for Streaming, Download Web Hosting News 2013-01-10 09:11:41
Wireless Symposium 2013 Web Hosting Events 2012-12-05 13:41:13
File Sharing Service RapidShare Changes Traffic Model to Deter Piracy Web Hosting News 2012-11-09 12:16:35
Web Host Webair Improves Cloud Hosting Disk Speeds with Fusion-io Web Hosting News 2012-02-22 11:27:07


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Login:
Log in with your username and password
Username:
Password:



Forgot Password?
Advertisement:
Web Hosting News:



 

X

Welcome to WebHostingTalk.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

WebHostingTalk.com is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?