hosted by liquidweb


Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : VPS Hosting : :fail: vs :fail: no such address here
Reply

VPS Hosting Virtual private server discussion and vps hosting solutions. Review VPS hosting providers and offer advice on virtual web hosting solutions. If your service is unavailable, please click here.
Forum Jump

:fail: vs :fail: no such address here

Reply Post New Thread In VPS Hosting Subscription
 
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-15-2006, 08:16 PM
mealto mealto is offline
Web Hosting Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 452

:fail: vs :fail: no such address here


:fail: vs :fail: no such address here

What is the major difference. In particualr to the system resources that gets used and implications to deal with spammers. TIA!

Reply With Quote


Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 10-15-2006, 08:31 PM
ffeingol ffeingol is offline
Community Guide
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,247
As far as I know they both do exactly the same thing. The second one simply (also) returns the message "no such address here" back to the originating SMTP server.

Frank

__________________
Umbra Hosting
cPanel | Softaculous | CloudLinux | R1Soft | Ksplice
Web Hosting, Reseller Hosting, VPS, Dedicated Servers, Colocation
UmbraHosting.com

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-15-2006, 08:55 PM
mealto mealto is offline
Web Hosting Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 452
So if there is a a physical bonce message, would that not cause more "usage" on the server.

With resources aside, most spammers are probably using some system to do their spamming and a bounce message would not bother them.

Which one do others use? with or without the message?

Come to think of it, would using :backhole: log all activity for future investigating?

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #4  
Old 10-15-2006, 09:20 PM
ffeingol ffeingol is offline
Community Guide
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,247
:fail: is not a bounce. I'm not a SMTP expert, but :fail: causes the mail to be rejected before your server actually accepts it. You really don't want to use :blackhole". :blackhole" accepts the message, runs it through all your spam/av filtering, then dumps it. Why would anyone want to do all that processing?

Frank

__________________
Umbra Hosting
cPanel | Softaculous | CloudLinux | R1Soft | Ksplice
Web Hosting, Reseller Hosting, VPS, Dedicated Servers, Colocation
UmbraHosting.com

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-16-2006, 04:43 PM
mealto mealto is offline
Web Hosting Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 452
So what is the difference bewteen:

:fail:
:fail: no such address here

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-16-2006, 04:56 PM
Harmolodic Harmolodic is offline
WHT Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 126
I believe ffeingol gave an exhaustive answer to your question:

Quote:
Originally Posted by ffeingol
As far as I know they both do exactly the same thing. The second one simply (also) returns the message "no such address here" back to the originating SMTP server.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-16-2006, 05:30 PM
mealto mealto is offline
Web Hosting Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 452
My bad, how did I miss that one? Sorry about that.

So that leads to my next question, which one should I use considering there is lots of spammers using our domain in the "reply to" field?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-16-2006, 05:40 PM
Harmolodic Harmolodic is offline
WHT Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 126
That's quite a different issue. You should add an SPF record to your domain's DNS zone in order to cut down on email spoofing: http://www.openspf.org/

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-16-2006, 05:50 PM
mealto mealto is offline
Web Hosting Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 452
H Harmolodic,

Thanks for the tip. Our VPS host did that for us already. Just wondering if there is anything that we can do to decrease spam. We see a list of emails in the queue and it was not sent out by us! Darn spammers.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Related posts from TheWhir.com
Title Type Date Posted
50ed3a2c-4d18-434d-9f5f-38d545a799de Listing 2013-03-05 18:25:20
50bcfd6d-bbf4-495f-ba51-785545a79962 Listing 2013-03-05 18:26:33
50a15ecd-cdbc-420c-9336-53a745a799a0 Listing 2013-03-05 18:23:08
50a15ecc-1614-4555-8734-539945a799a0 Listing 2013-03-05 18:26:35
5080711f-1760-48fc-84de-325345a799de Listing 2013-03-05 18:26:30


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Login:
Log in with your username and password
Username:
Password:



Forgot Password?
Advertisement:
Web Hosting News:



 

X

Welcome to WebHostingTalk.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

WebHostingTalk.com is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?