Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    RTP, NC

    * Celeron 3.2 vs Pentium 4 2.4

    I am in the process of purchasing a new dedicated server, I need to know the basic cons & pros of choosing either a

    Pentium 4 2.4GHZ or a Celeron 3.2

    Also I need to know the limitations of CentOS4 vs Redhat Linux
    The general public has been manufactured as a Nation of ventriloquist dummies.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Pentium 4 2.4 celerons are rubbish in my opinion. i had one it was nothing but bad news (not mentioning the company as they quickly rectified the problem).

    P4 all the way

    I suggest CentOS as its the most stable of all linux systems and most providers reccomend it

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    here and there
    Quote Originally Posted by XHIServices
    I suggest CentOS as its the most stable of all linux systems and most providers reccomend it

    I just love when a customer running CentOS or Fedora pages me at 3 in the morning because they enabled SElinux or the 'firewall' and now the box is inaccessible from the internet.

    Install whatever you're familiar with. If the celeron is cheaper than the P4 and it's just a personal box for a few things, go that route. Otherwise the P4 would offer more advantages in a 'server' role. It also depends on what model Celeron and what model P4 - there are faster/slower chips in each family released at different times - bus speed, cache size, etc.

    Awknet - DDoS Mitigation, Upstream ACLs/Filtering, Unmanaged Dedicated Servers, BGP IP Transit & More!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2006
    yep p4 all the way, celerons just do not cut it for a server, well if you have a real non-busy server it might suffice but I done been that route, it dont work and I didnt even have that many busy sites.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Jacksonville, FL
    I'm going to take the contrarian point of view and recommend the Celeron over the P4. Both have the same FSB (533Mhz); the basic difference is cache. That particular chip has 256kb; the P4 has 512. Even so, I would think the increased clock frequency would make for a faster machine.

    As for CentOS, it really has no "limitations" compared to RedHat Linux (I assume you mean their Enterprise Linux product). The only tangible difference I'm aware of is that it says CentOS and not RedHat, as CentOS is just RHEL compiled by someone else and given away free.

    Now selling BigVPS's!
    Jacksonville Colocation and dedicated servers by colo4jax
    We are *not* a reseller. We own our servers, switches, routers and racks.

  6. #6
    Just like tical said, Celerons have 256kb of cache, Pentium4's have 512kb. Believe me this is a big difference and you will notice it if your server gets crowded. So I would go with the P4. Celerons aren't even good for desktop systems. (They are if you only use office applications, still... don't try to load a big xls file on it!)

    Both CentOS and RedHat are great linux distros with plenty of users around to help you out when you need.
    » Oxyte Communications, LLC - "Superior, that's the term."
    » Reseller Hosting at extremely affordable rates backed up by our ultra protective Service Level Agreement.
    » Includes: Billing System, eNom Domain Reseller Account, Branded cPanel Theme, RVSkin (23 languages), Private Nameservers & more!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Is the P4 is a 400 MHz or 533 MHz FSB?
    [QuickPacket™] [AS46261]
    Located in Atlanta, GA and Los Angeles, CA
    Dedicated Servers, KVM, Xen & OpenVZ VPS, Co-location, R1Soft Data Backup, Shared & Reseller Hosting

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts