hosted by liquidweb


Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : Web Hosting : Hosting Users - Rank Your Revenue
Reply

Forum Jump

Hosting Users - Rank Your Revenue

View Poll Results: Host USERS - Rank Your Revenue (not profit)
Personal site, no $ goals or for beer 12 19.35%
Charity / Not for profit 7 11.29%
< 1000$ per year 12 19.35%
1,001 - 5,000$ per year 7 11.29%
5,001 - 15,000$ per year 4 6.45%
15,001 - 50,000$ per year 2 3.23%
50,001 - 100,000$ per year 5 8.06%
100,001 - 500,000$ per year 2 3.23%
500,001 - 1,000,000$ per year 3 4.84%
> 1M$ and I hang here for kicks 8 12.90%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Post New Thread In Web Hosting Subscription
 
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-03-2002, 11:39 PM
mwatkins mwatkins is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,416
Lightbulb

Hosting USERS - Rank Yourself!!


PLEASE NOTE THIS POLL IS FOR Hosting Users (Not resellers or hosters themselves)

Rank your revenue (or lack thereof) from your web site. Maybe your web site(s) generate income, perhaps they are personal, but wouldn't it be interesting to see some stats on this?

Hey, no need to id yourself - and there are enough responses now that your identity will not be associated with revenue, if you are concerned about such stuff.

So go ahead, use the poll!


Last edited by mwatkins; 06-04-2002 at 12:24 PM.
Reply With Quote


Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 06-04-2002, 12:09 AM
mwatkins mwatkins is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,416
Other than simply being curious, I wonder how many revenue producing web sites are out there being hosted on services such as those provided by the web hosters / resellers that frequent WHT.

Or, are most users running sites offering free content? or Personal sites?

And is it lack of revenue that causes users to seek out budget hosters? Or is intense competition between hosters the only force driving prices down?

I'm asking because I assume that revenue producing sites care less about small cost differences and more about stability - yet so many comments on WHT are focussed ultimately on cheap deals and nothing but...

... leading one to conclude that the vast majority of sites are free / personal / non revenue producing ventures.

?

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-04-2002, 01:50 AM
Deb Deb is offline
WHT Forum Royalty
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Orlando FL USA
Posts: 1,316
<begin sarcasm>

I find these results shocking actually. Run another poll for hosts asking "How much revenue do your clients claim to be loosing every minute their web site is down?" I bet you'll see much higher numbers

</end sarcasm>
Quote:
And is it lack of revenue that causes users to seek out budget hosters? Or is intense competition between hosters the only force driving prices down?
I think it's probably a bit of both. There are MANY hobby and NFP web sites on the Internet that need to be hosted somewhere and there was a day they were willing to pay $20/month for that service. Today we have the "intense competition" mixed with many more NFP and personal web sites and that is what keeps forums like WHT booming

Ok..I'm going to go back to my hole now as I can see I'm too tired to be too serious tonight Feel free to flame me

__________________
FutureQuest.net
Quality Services & Professional Support Since 1998
Click Here To Visit the Community

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #4  
Old 06-04-2002, 01:53 AM
mwatkins mwatkins is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,416
Quote:
Run another poll for hosts asking "How much revenue do your clients claim to be loosing every minute their web site is down?" I bet you'll see much higher numbers
LOL I agree. I suspect that most of the whiners lose very little due to down time. I've seen this in other on-line ventures - take day trading - the failure stats are very high for day traders yet it would seem that when trading sites or software is down, *everyone* is missing out their daily big bonanza.

LOL

Real life just aint like that.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-04-2002, 02:15 AM
ozzie ozzie is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 10
Well my site is a personal site and I have no qualms about admitting that, that is why I want a low cost site that allows me www as well as POP3.

I wonder how many people are going to select the > $1M just for kicks.

Ozzie

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-04-2002, 02:19 AM
nuthin nuthin is offline
Freelance SEO Consultant
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,186
loss of revenue due to downtime from a host can be percieved in many ways.
If my host is down when googlebot hits my site? Therefor it won't get indexed in google's index, Then their is that potential to lose alot of revenue until googlebot happens to update there index again which has been happening every month.
And for my site which will be going up against lucrative terms like "wedding gifts" and "gifts" there's alot of money that will be lossed all because a web host was down when googlebot came crawling. So there's 1 month's potential revenue that will be lossed.
This aint just with google if you submit to yahoo and dmoz and editors finally get around to reviewing your site and your host is down then you will have to wait and re-submit again and wait another 3/6 months.
That's just one reason why 99.99% uptime is very important.
And probably that's why i am one of those "whiners" about hosts that guarantee 99.99% uptime then fall very short.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-04-2002, 02:25 AM
Deb Deb is offline
WHT Forum Royalty
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Orlando FL USA
Posts: 1,316
Quote:
And probably that's why i am one of those "whiners" about hosts that guarantee 99.99% uptime then fall very short.
"whining" about a host that has fallen short of their promises is a totally different topic all together and I'd like to note that that type of "whining" is not what my above sarcasm was referring to. There's a different type of 'whining' that pleads thousands per minute for sites that are not yet developed and are often still in propagation phases... The hosts are quite familiar with "those types" and it was meant as a joke

__________________
FutureQuest.net
Quality Services & Professional Support Since 1998
Click Here To Visit the Community

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-04-2002, 02:48 AM
mwatkins mwatkins is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,416
Down time complaints are legit, however fretting that you are missing the the few hours out of 2160 hours... seems a bit overboard to me.

That's a .02% chance of missing the prized bot if the downtime is 5 hours out of 2160 hours (3 months).

There are better ways of getting your site in the indexes than worrying about that .02%.

However being down for 5 hours, for a site that generates revenue, shouldn't be something you need to tolerate. Sure, there will be times when downtime is unavoidable, but your hoster should be able to mitigate most issues and recover faster than 5 hours on average.

WHT is replete with stories of one host down or another for extended periods of time. Its clear from reading a lot of these stories that some of these hosters have little redundancy or experience in planning for and dealing with downtime.

Contrast that to a big experienced provider:
http://pair.com/pair/support/notices/older.html

Notice how very few of the outages are for more than 10 - 15 minutes? And even for the truly serious outages, the hoster was able to deal with them in a straightforward professional manner?

Forget 99.9999% guarantees - nothing can be guaranteed with certainty. IMO its more important to see how hosters deal with problems than to rely on some arbitrary % of uptime.

I really believe that penny wise / pound foolish for a revenue generating site is a good rule of thumb when it comes to chosing a hosting partner. It costs real $ to have quality machines, network, spares, people etc.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-04-2002, 08:24 AM
dragonhawk dragonhawk is offline
WHT Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Aussie Land
Posts: 162
I think we can rule out the 1M plus

Edit: had to remove a part of my post, coz it's a bit embarrassing (didn't read the thread properly) :p

__________________
Arcade Online


Last edited by dragonhawk; 06-04-2002 at 09:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-04-2002, 09:31 AM
pmabraham pmabraham is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,221
Greetings:

Please deduct one vote from the "500,001 - 1,000,000$ per year" category.

I apologize, but didn't catch that this was for hosting customers only and not providers of hosting or managed services.

Thank you.

__________________
---
Peter M. Abraham
LinkedIn Profile


Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-04-2002, 09:43 AM
cperciva cperciva is offline
Retired Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,603
Does it count if people offer to give me money, but I refuse to accept it? In that case, count this as a vote in the $1M+ category.

Of course, that was just an absurd consequence of the overheated VC market a couple years back.

__________________
Dr. Colin Percival, FreeBSD Security Officer
Online backups for the truly paranoid: http://www.tarsnap.com/

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-04-2002, 12:13 PM
mwatkins mwatkins is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,416
So far 66% of web hosting users derive at least some revenue for their site. Lets keep this going!

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-05-2002, 11:37 AM
mwatkins mwatkins is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,416
More than 70% of respondents derive revenue from their web sites. And 43% generate more than 5,000$ per year in revenue.

Lets keep this going.

I wonder if we'll see anything like the 80/20 rule once enough numbers come in...

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-05-2002, 04:11 PM
UnkleMunky UnkleMunky is offline
Junior Guru Wannabe
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 34
Hmmm.....interesting poll. Not sure if my situation applies to others, but with a few sites in my nest now, not all are the same format, but my main site(s) do bring in some change($), so at least a little. A couple others sites are personal(no money intended) types, so decided to take an overall view and voted that way.

BTW.....for those folks checking the $1M+ option, umm......you looking to buy a few good sites?? That might put me in a higher bracket myself! heeehheeee.......


Take care....
Michael

Reply With Quote
Reply

Related posts from TheWhir.com
Title Type Date Posted
IBM Avoids Penalty as SEC Concludes Cloud Revenue Investigation Web Hosting News 2014-06-03 11:09:33
Microsoft Shows Strong Cloud and Server Revenue Growth in Quarterly Results Web Hosting News 2014-01-24 15:48:30
Wix.com Files Registration with SEC for US IPO Web Hosting News 2013-06-04 15:25:56
Domainchy Helps Web Hosts Tap iPhone Users with New White Label iOS App Web Hosting News 2014-05-09 12:41:02
iNET Interactive on Inc. 5000 Fastest Growing Company List for Fifth Consecutive Year Web Hosting News 2012-08-23 10:49:23


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Login:
Log in with your username and password
Username:
Password:



Forgot Password?
Advertisement:
Web Hosting News:



 

X

Welcome to WebHostingTalk.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

WebHostingTalk.com is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?