06-26-2006, 04:58 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Behind You.
Posts: 692
|
|
Apache 1.3.36, Apache 2.0.58 or Apache 2.2.2
Any thoughts my friends?
Anyone ran a benchmark against all three and found out which configuration provides for most efficient use?
People seem to have differing opinions all of a sudden with the latest updates since 1.3.33 and 2.0.54, back then it was 1.3 was 50% faster..... how about now?
Or other webservers, like lighttpd compared to these three?
~Mouse
|
06-26-2006, 06:24 PM
|
|
Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 15
|
|
Most of the servers I`ve seen still uses. httpd (1.3.36 (Unix))
|
06-26-2006, 09:22 PM
|
|
I like ice cream
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California USA
Posts: 11,565
|
|
I personally am a big fan of apache 2.2 right now.
|
06-26-2006, 10:02 PM
|
|
Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10
|
|
2nd vote for Apache22 but I haven't run any speed tests.
|
06-26-2006, 10:47 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Behind You.
Posts: 692
|
|
ah, i'm glad to see Steven's opinion here.... but no one has really ran tests or benchmarks against the three.....
Steven, is there any special reasons your a big fan of 2.2.x or just because it's the newest?
|
06-27-2006, 02:02 AM
|
|
I like ice cream
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California USA
Posts: 11,565
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mouseattack
ah, i'm glad to see Steven's opinion here.... but no one has really ran tests or benchmarks against the three.....
Steven, is there any special reasons your a big fan of 2.2.x or just because it's the newest?
|
I am currently using it to run a vbulletin forum that gets over 2000 conncurrent users. I saw a big improvement over 1.3 with it.
|
06-27-2006, 02:51 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Jose
Posts: 902
|
|
__________________
Specializing in MySQL and website tuning for high traffic sites. cmwsci.com/
|
06-27-2006, 02:58 AM
|
|
I like ice cream
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California USA
Posts: 11,565
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sailorFred
Which MPM are you using?
|
worker at the moment, but I saw good increases with prefork. been switching back and forth lately.
|
06-27-2006, 03:56 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Behind You.
Posts: 692
|
|
MPM ? lol, sorry for the newbie question....
|
06-27-2006, 10:55 AM
|
|
I like ice cream
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California USA
Posts: 11,565
|
|
|
06-27-2006, 01:16 PM
|
|
Aspiring Evangelist
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 368
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sailorFred
Which MPM are you using?
|
Note that PHP is not compatible with multi-threaded MPMs such as worker. So if you're using PHP as an Apache module (DSO), then prefork is the only supported/safe choice.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
| Postbit Selector |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Login: |
|
|
| Advertisement: |
|
|
| Web Hosting News: |
|
|
|
