Results 1 to 25 of 28
Thread: Which OS to Pick
-
12-04-2005, 04:04 PM #1WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 114
Which OS to Pick
I was looking into a server from Layered Tech. They have a bunch of OS's I can choose from. Which one would you recommend and why?
FreeBSD 4.x
FreeBSD 5.x
Fedora Core 3
Fedora Core 3
Debian Stable
Debian Sarge
OpenBSD 3.x
NetBSD 2.x
CentOS 3.x
CentOS 4.x
Red Hat Enterprise Server 3 - Extra $27/mo - what makes this one worth more?
Regards,
Dave
-
12-04-2005, 04:09 PM #2Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Maryland
- Posts
- 562
It depends what you want to do with this server. I know that Red Hat is a top line OS, it is something that the community trusts. I think it is also really good if you want to use Oracle.
-
12-04-2005, 04:12 PM #3WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 114
Well it will be for web hosting, just not sure why it costs more from LT but places like theplanet and servermatrix offer it for free.
-
12-04-2005, 04:12 PM #4Retired Moderator
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- Flint, Michigan
- Posts
- 5,766
I'd pick that one
█ Mike from Zoodia.com
█ Professional web design and development services.
█ In need of a fresh hosting design? See what premade designs we have in stock!
█ Web design tips, tricks, and more at MichaelPruitt.com
-
12-04-2005, 05:34 PM #5WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 114
Originally Posted by justadollarhostin
-
12-04-2005, 05:36 PM #6WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- New Orleans, LA
- Posts
- 155
I <3 CentOS 4.x for hosting
-
12-04-2005, 05:41 PM #7WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 114
Originally Posted by Tebow
-
12-04-2005, 05:47 PM #8Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 1,032
Oh wow my wonderful techie has already posted lol
I'll have to second his vote for CentOS 4.x (4.2 actually)
Let me list some reasons:
First, you dont have to pay the extra $27 per month that you do with Red Hat Enterprise, yet it's the same exact thing (minus the support from redhat).
To our extent of testing the O.S. it had one little hiccup with the SCSI drives on one of the machines, when compiling the kernel for 4.2 you NEED to have a thing or two compiled into it (thanks rack911). CentOS 4.2 is a fairly flexible and stable operating system that provides what Red Hat Enterprise does without the cost. I also like the fact that the performance on it is very good (40% faster from fedora core 3, tested using same machine encoding/decoding files)Webair Internet Development Inc.
Shared Hosting • Managed Dedicated Servers • SEO
1.866.WEBAIR.1 • www.webair.com • 24/7/365 Support • Adult Friendly
My comments do not reflect the views of the company or its management.
-
12-04-2005, 06:12 PM #9Retired Moderator
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- Flint, Michigan
- Posts
- 5,766
Originally Posted by Jako
I hope you can start to see the point of my posts There is no perfect operating system. All you are getting is what everybody else likes to run, and this is not their machine. Instead look to what you are familiar with and what runs best with your application set. If you don't have experience with any of them, then you should look to whatever company is going to be taking care of your machine to what they work best with.
If I created a "favorite pizza topping thread", the winner most likely would not match what is right for me.█ Mike from Zoodia.com
█ Professional web design and development services.
█ In need of a fresh hosting design? See what premade designs we have in stock!
█ Web design tips, tricks, and more at MichaelPruitt.com
-
12-04-2005, 06:51 PM #10WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 114
I've heard a lot of good things about centOS, looks like I will go with that. If you guys have any other suggestions, let me know.
-
12-04-2005, 07:01 PM #11Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Surrey BC
- Posts
- 1,343
Slackware! Oh wait its not on the list
-
12-04-2005, 07:13 PM #12ThirtySx Bits Forever!
- Join Date
- Jul 2001
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,284
More Unix-like
OpenBSD for maximum security at perhaps some reduction in user friendliness
FreeBSD for good stability and performance under load
NetBSD if you are already used to using it
Linux solutions
Debian stable for a very stable platform with good user-friendly but with generally slightly older versions of software packages
Debian sarge if you want to perhaps give up a bit of stability for more current applications.
Red Hat Enterprise Server 3 - Extra $27/mo - what makes this one worth more?
If you are already used to using RedHat. Stable commercial version costs more because there is support directly from RedHat and the licence costs the host a fee, which they pass on.
CentOS if you want most of the RedHat features and way of doing things in a free no licence version
I would not use Fedora on a production machine (though many do) as it remains a test bed/experimentation distribution.
In the end it depends what you are used to using and your needs. Any are reasonable choices. Realize that if you want cPanel/WHM it works better on Linux than BSD."Obsolesence is just a lack of imagination."
-
12-04-2005, 07:13 PM #13Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 9,264
CentOS 4.X+
It's RHEL (red hat enterprise) but free!
Perfect, updated quickly by developers and flawless: Enjoy!
-
12-04-2005, 07:14 PM #14WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 101
It wouldn't be smart taking the advice of anyone here -- you should use the one that fits your technical abilities the best.
I personally recommend FreeBSD just because that's the one I'm the most comfortable with. If you're using apackaging system that you aren't intimately familiar with, you're begging to be exploited sooner or later!
Btw, RedHat Enterprise is more because it isn't free. They've got to pass along the cost of offering that to you -- nothing wrong with that, but it probably isn't necessary for you.
-
12-04-2005, 07:26 PM #15Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 9,264
HostingEnthusiast,
If he had already known his own flavour/technical abilities: He wouldn't be here asking.
-
12-04-2005, 07:30 PM #16WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Fort Collins, CO
- Posts
- 151
CentOS for sure!
NEW Hosting solution coming soon....
-
12-04-2005, 07:39 PM #17WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 114
Originally Posted by David
-
12-04-2005, 07:42 PM #18Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 9,264
And before I go off looking like a retard or anything: Just remember that just about every package retrieval system (apt-get, yum, etc.) can be installed on everything.
If you're comfortable with apt-get - get it!
If you're comfortable with yum - get it!
//Note: I'm level1 but my beating stick is level3!
-
12-04-2005, 07:45 PM #19Retired Moderator
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- Flint, Michigan
- Posts
- 5,766
I still stand by the simple answer of: Pick the one that's best for you.
He has not given us anything to actually go by in deciding what type of OS he should choose. What if I told you all of a suddent that he wanted to do streaming WMV's? Wouldn't everybody then start saying Windows!!! What if I told you he wanted to run a LiveJournal.com clone? Well Debian would be the way to go.
Actually guys, he is going to be offering shell services (anybody who knows LT knows this won't be the case, but if it was) I'm sure we'd hear many people, even Linux lovers, saying *BSD is the way to go.
Nevermind, he is looking to run such and such control panel that doesn't support BSD, well time for CentOS!
The list could go on and on and on.
Here's how you choose the best OS (notice they are in an order, but not a specific order. The position on the order has no weight in my post).
1. What your applications are going to run best on.
2. What you like/have experience with.
3*. What your admin likes/has experience with.
* = Replaces number 2 if it does not apply.
edit:I'm level1 but my beating stick is level3!█ Mike from Zoodia.com
█ Professional web design and development services.
█ In need of a fresh hosting design? See what premade designs we have in stock!
█ Web design tips, tricks, and more at MichaelPruitt.com
-
12-04-2005, 08:12 PM #20Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Posts
- 9,264
doublep,
I'm afraid your post made little sense.
Care to elaborate?
-
12-04-2005, 08:27 PM #21Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 1,032
he said his custom freebsd kernel is stuck in his duh.
he's just accumilating posts so he can spamWebair Internet Development Inc.
Shared Hosting • Managed Dedicated Servers • SEO
1.866.WEBAIR.1 • www.webair.com • 24/7/365 Support • Adult Friendly
My comments do not reflect the views of the company or its management.
-
12-04-2005, 10:05 PM #22WHT Addict
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 101
Well, I think my post had some content beside the slight cynicism, although I doubt many of you agree with my choice of FreeBSD
Honestly, do any of you here believe that posting on a message board is the best way to gain insight into which OS you would like the most? I think every technical board that I've seen that question asked on was specifically made as a troll and/or caused a huge flame war.
When I'm truly interested in learning about something, I do a search to find existing resources that are worth looking at (such as previous forum posts or someone's personal rants on the subject), then I look to technical docs from the ones that seem suited best. If there are any questions left, of course posting on a message board is a great way to not only learn a lot more but also have the replies there for anyone who posts in the future.
But, either way, I guess as long as there aren't any flamewars started because of it, it can't be too bad, and I can continue to suggest that he bow before the might that is FreeBSD
-
12-04-2005, 11:09 PM #23Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Southern NYS
- Posts
- 535
CentOS would be my choice.
PacketAce
Because packets were meant to be delivered.
Premium Mzima Bandwith at Equinix - Secaucus, NJ
-
12-05-2005, 01:10 PM #24ThirtySx Bits Forever!
- Join Date
- Jul 2001
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,284
As an addendum, if you are not sufficiently informed to chose the OS for your server, I'd advise hirring a systems administrator who is knowledgeable and acapable and discussing it with them as they are likely going to be the one managing your server.
HostingEnthusiast said: It wouldn't be smart taking the advice of anyone here -- you should use the one that fits your technical abilities the best."Obsolesence is just a lack of imagination."
-
12-05-2005, 01:17 PM #25Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Essex, England
- Posts
- 548
For generic webhosting, with cPanel, CentOS 4.x is probably the best.
RHEL costs more because RH give you support for the price. CentOS is RHEL, but without the support.