
10-19-2005, 11:02 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 624
|
|
I was just wondering what the pros/cons of using a software raid 1 setup or using a hardware raid 1 setup? Are there any big issues with either of them?
|

10-19-2005, 12:18 PM
|
|
Community Liaison
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,597
|
|
Do you mean comparing Software RAID to Hardware RAID?
Of course you'll get less performance issues by using (quality) hardware RAID setup.
Regards,
|

10-19-2005, 12:39 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 624
|
|
Yes comparing the two.
Are performance issues common with software raid?
|

10-19-2005, 12:59 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Evangelist
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 548
|
|
Yes, as the work is done by the processor instead of dedicated controller chip.
You also won't get features like hot-swap and hot-spare with software.
|

10-19-2005, 01:09 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,911
|
|
Con of hardware - Cost
other then that hardware is best
|

10-19-2005, 01:58 PM
|
|
Managed Hosting Expert
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 4,163
|
|
I would disagree with hardware being best, from my experience, I've seen many hardware cards crap out and screw up entire arrays, where data could not be recovered - NEVER seen that once with software.
And IMO the performance difference is negligible with RAID1.
__________________
█ Dan Kitchen | Technical Director | Razorblue
█ ddi: (+44) (0)1748 900 680 | e: dkitchen@razorblue.com
█ UK Intensive Managed Hosting, Clusters and Colocation.
█ HP Servers, Cisco/Juniper Powered BGP Network (AS15692).
|

10-19-2005, 02:50 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 951
|
|
Razorblue is right .. same experiences here .. adding a RAID card is raising the chances of hardware problems. You need to think about the pros and the cons in your specific situation and the pros and the cons are not limited to cost.
|

10-19-2005, 03:28 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 624
|
|
That is what I am looking for the pros/cons of both setups. I'm not really worried about the costs, to me thats not a con if it is a better setup. I am trying to figure out what method would be better for disk mirroring.
|

10-19-2005, 03:38 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 951
|
|
1- What hardware will you use and what will you use the server for?
2- Will you use IDE or SCSI hard disks?
3- Will there be a LOT of disk activity?
4- Is a 15 minute downtime to change a hard disk critical in your situation?
I would say that the pros and cons depend of your particular situation. I would say software for raid-1 solutions, hardware raid for raid-5 scsi or other advanced solutions. Personnal opinion based on my personnal experience.
Regards,
|

10-19-2005, 03:42 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 624
|
|
1) dual xeon, 2 GB ram, it will be a web/mysql server
2) IDE drives
3) most likely, it will be the only server I have
4) 15 minutes downtime is fine, more then that might start to have issues with that.
Thanks for your opinion.
|

10-19-2005, 03:49 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 951
|
|
I would choose software raid-1 ... the performance lost of software raid should not affect you, the cost is cheaper and you will avoid possible hardware raid adapter problems. Make sure that someone is available quickly to swap the drives if a drive fails. Also, do not forget to have an external backup because you cannot rely on your raid drive to be your only backup, if a data corruption occurs on your first drive there are chances that data will also be corrupted on the mirror drive.
|

10-19-2005, 04:30 PM
|
|
THE Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,542
|
|
What hardware RAID cards are people using that they're having problems with? We've been using a good numbers of 3ware cards for well over a year now and we have yet to see any issue with them.
|

10-19-2005, 04:37 PM
|
|
Community Liaison
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,654
|
|
I agree plus with most you can backup the raid config offline which means IF the card dies you can put a replacement in and have the raid config back.
In terms of hardware raid actually mangling the drives/contents no thats been very rare maybe happened once on an old DEC server where we put the wrong driver on and thats in about 16 years of working with hardware raid.
__________________
:: André Allen Communications, Community and Channel
:: iWeb.com - Dedicated, Cloud, Colocation
:: Managed, Guaranteed IOPS Cloud Servers, - Money back Guarantee http://www.iweb.com
|

10-20-2005, 05:16 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sheffield, South Yorks
Posts: 3,286
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by KarlZimmer
What hardware RAID cards are people using that they're having problems with? We've been using a good numbers of 3ware cards for well over a year now and we have yet to see any issue with them.
|
I was just thinking the same, we've been using RAID for coming up to 5 years now in our servers and certainly aren't seeing the issues many are pointing out. With the 3Ware cards, they store the RAID config on the drives, so if the card dies, you just put another one in and away you go.
|

10-20-2005, 05:31 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,040
|
|
I was just thinking the same, we've been using RAID for coming up to 5 years now in our servers and certainly aren't seeing the issues many are pointing out. With the 3Ware cards, they store the RAID config on the drives, so if the card dies, you just put another one in and away you go.
Ditto.
It's also very handy if another component fails in a server. Just swap out all the hard disks to your spare chassis, and the 3ware controller in that chassis picks up all of the array data off the hard disks.
If you're worried about extra redundancy or performance, look at using RAID5 or RAID10 instead.
Performance (particularly write, compared to the 9500) on the new 9550SX cards is pretty amazing as well.
__________________
Robin Balen
Gyron Internet Ltd - http://gyron.net/
UK colocation, managed hosting and connectivity services with 100% uptime SLAs
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
| Postbit Selector |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Login: |
|
|
| Advertisement: |
|
|
| Web Hosting News: |
|
|
|