Results 1 to 14 of 14
-
07-23-2005, 01:37 AM #1Disabled
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 109
Which AMD compares to or beats Intel
Celeron 2.4Ghz --- > AMD SEMPRON 2200
Pentium 4 2.4 Ghz --- > AMD SEMPRON 2300
Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz --- > AMD SEMPRON 2800
I think it would be this order, what you say?
-
07-23-2005, 01:39 AM #2I LOVE Cogent!
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 2,005
You're comparing the P4's to the Sempron's? The Sempron's are supposed to be the equivelent of Celeron's, not the P4's....
I wish all my traffic went through AS174.
-
07-23-2005, 01:55 AM #3WebHostingTalk Lover
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- New York City
- Posts
- 7,406
Definitely P4 2.8
█• Taskade - To-Do List & Tasks • All-in-One To-Do List & Mind Map App for Remote Teams
█• Simple and shareable to-do lists for web, mobile, and desktop
█• To-Do List Templates • 300+ shareable templates and productivity workflows
█• Get things done, faster and smarter! • I eat penguins for breakfast ...
-
07-23-2005, 02:00 AM #4Disabled
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Atlanta, Georgia
- Posts
- 521
Originally posted by SolidJoe
You're comparing the P4's to the Sempron's? The Sempron's are supposed to be the equivelent of Celeron's, not the P4's....
That is not entirely true, in some case the semprons actually crush comperably priced P4's
The sempron may be a "value" processor but they are extremely fast. The sempron 2xxx -> 3000 are based on the older amd XP core just with less cache and some are actually rebranded xps all together. Performance is great (on some)
Begining with the socket 754 semprons they are "handicapped" amd 64s, we run sempron 3100+ (paris core 800mhz) and these things are insanely fast, price/performance is amazing.
I just built a new PC for my wife, picked up a retail sempron 3100+ for $108, built the entire system for her for under $400 and it's one heck of a box
-
07-23-2005, 02:07 AM #5Disabled
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 109
I found that 2800 Sempron beat P4 2.8 or are equal with them
-
07-23-2005, 02:08 AM #6Disabled
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Atlanta, Georgia
- Posts
- 521
Originally posted by RajH
I found that 2800 Sempron beat P4 2.8 or are equal with them
-
07-23-2005, 09:01 PM #7Aspiring Evangelist
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Montreal, PQ
- Posts
- 355
Definately non-HT...
-
07-23-2005, 09:22 PM #8Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2000
- Location
- Washington, USA
- Posts
- 5,990
It really depends on what Sempron cores you are referring to. Below 3000 there are both A64, and AXP based chips.
-
07-23-2005, 10:18 PM #9Carpe Diem
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Connecticut
- Posts
- 3,038
Originally posted by TulipSystems
That is not entirely true, in some case the semprons actually crush comperably priced P4's
The sempron may be a "value" processor but they are extremely fast. The sempron 2xxx -> 3000 are based on the older amd XP core just with less cache and some are actually rebranded xps all together. Performance is great (on some)
Begining with the socket 754 semprons they are "handicapped" amd 64s, we run sempron 3100+ (paris core 800mhz) and these things are insanely fast, price/performance is amazing.
I just built a new PC for my wife, picked up a retail sempron 3100+ for $108, built the entire system for her for under $400 and it's one heck of a box
I would assume since the OP is posting in the Dedicated Server forum he/she is inquiring about server systems not desktops.
-
07-23-2005, 10:25 PM #10Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- Indiana, US
- Posts
- 1,355
Originally posted by X-Gaming
I would assume since the OP is posting in the Dedicated Server forum he/she is inquiring about server systems not desktops.
-
07-23-2005, 10:30 PM #11Carpe Diem
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Connecticut
- Posts
- 3,038
That was more towards TulipSystems making a comparison of his wife's desktop system which If his wife is anything like mine she doesn't run databases and websites off her desktop either
Point being of course it may run fast at home but in a work enviroment it won't act the same. So the comparison is a moot point.
-
07-23-2005, 11:35 PM #12Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Posts
- 3,374
here is a chart on AMD cpu and the difference between different core
http://www.c627627.com/AMD/Athlon64/
-
07-24-2005, 12:21 AM #13Disabled
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Atlanta, Georgia
- Posts
- 521
Originally posted by X-Gaming
That was more towards TulipSystems making a comparison of his wife's desktop system which If his wife is anything like mine she doesn't run databases and websites off her desktop either
Point being of course it may run fast at home but in a work enviroment it won't act the same. So the comparison is a moot point.
We use systems of the exact same specs for our low end boxes (semprons) and I'll tell you they perform extremely well in that application as well. Since the OP wasn't specifically asking about their perf in any specific situation I just gave one example, if anyone would like to see some benchmarks of a sempron 3100+ give me what you'd like run on one and I'll have a box put up for benchmarking.
-
07-24-2005, 03:46 AM #14Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Posts
- 662
I have to agree with Ryan, we do often use the seti@home client to benchmark CPUs and we've found amazing results on AMD boxes.
We recently set up a small sempron 2600 as a development server in our LAN and it performed better than the Celeron 2.4 that we were using (this development server is used to test VoIP applications).