
07-23-2005, 01:37 AM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 109
|
|
Which AMD compares to or beats Intel
Celeron 2.4Ghz --- > AMD SEMPRON 2200
Pentium 4 2.4 Ghz --- > AMD SEMPRON 2300
Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz --- > AMD SEMPRON 2800
I think it would be this order, what you say?
|

07-23-2005, 01:39 AM
|
|
I LOVE Cogent!
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 1,999
|
|
You're comparing the P4's to the Sempron's? The Sempron's are supposed to be the equivelent of Celeron's, not the P4's....
__________________
I wish all my traffic went through AS174.
|

07-23-2005, 01:55 AM
|
|
WebHostingTalk Lover
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 7,393
|
|
Definitely P4 2.8 
__________________
█• CirtexHosting • Providing Affordable and Quality Web Hosting & Reseller Hosting since 2003
█• LINUX based cPANEL/WHM Shared and Reseller Web Hosting with Fantastico
█• HostV VPS • Premium Virtual Private Servers & Dedicated Servers powered by cPanel/WHM
█• We transfer your sites over quickly! • I eat penguins for breakfast ...
|

07-23-2005, 02:00 AM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 520
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by SolidJoe
You're comparing the P4's to the Sempron's? The Sempron's are supposed to be the equivelent of Celeron's, not the P4's....
|
That is not entirely true, in some case the semprons actually crush comperably priced P4's
The sempron may be a "value" processor but they are extremely fast. The sempron 2xxx -> 3000 are based on the older amd XP core just with less cache and some are actually rebranded xps all together. Performance is great (on some)
Begining with the socket 754 semprons they are "handicapped" amd 64s, we run sempron 3100+ (paris core 800mhz) and these things are insanely fast, price/performance is amazing.
I just built a new PC for my wife, picked up a retail sempron 3100+ for $108, built the entire system for her for under $400 and it's one heck of a box
|

07-23-2005, 02:07 AM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 109
|
|
I found that 2800 Sempron beat P4 2.8 or are equal with them
|

07-23-2005, 02:08 AM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 520
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by RajH
I found that 2800 Sempron beat P4 2.8 or are equal with them
|
what core p4 2.8? w/ht or non-ht...
|

07-23-2005, 09:01 PM
|
|
Aspiring Evangelist
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Montreal, PQ
Posts: 355
|
|
|

07-23-2005, 09:22 PM
|
|
Community Guide
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Washington, USA
Posts: 5,978
|
|
It really depends on what Sempron cores you are referring to. Below 3000 there are both A64, and AXP based chips.
__________________
John T. Yocum -- Fluid Hosting
Shared - VPS - Dedicated - Colocation
|

07-23-2005, 10:18 PM
|
|
Carpe Diem
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,038
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TulipSystems
That is not entirely true, in some case the semprons actually crush comperably priced P4's
The sempron may be a "value" processor but they are extremely fast. The sempron 2xxx -> 3000 are based on the older amd XP core just with less cache and some are actually rebranded xps all together. Performance is great (on some)
Begining with the socket 754 semprons they are "handicapped" amd 64s, we run sempron 3100+ (paris core 800mhz) and these things are insanely fast, price/performance is amazing.
I just built a new PC for my wife, picked up a retail sempron 3100+ for $108, built the entire system for her for under $400 and it's one heck of a box
|
I would assume since the OP is posting in the Dedicated Server forum he/she is inquiring about server systems not desktops.
|

07-23-2005, 10:25 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Indiana, US
Posts: 1,354
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by X-Gaming
I would assume since the OP is posting in the Dedicated Server forum he/she is inquiring about server systems not desktops.
|
He didn't inquire about servers, he inquired about CPUs. And last time I checked, they run at the same performance regardless of what kind of case it's in.
|

07-23-2005, 10:30 PM
|
|
Carpe Diem
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,038
|
|
That was more towards TulipSystems making a comparison of his wife's desktop system which If his wife is anything like mine she doesn't run databases and websites off her desktop either
Point being of course it may run fast at home but in a work enviroment it won't act the same. So the comparison is a moot point. 
|

07-24-2005, 12:21 AM
|
|
Disabled
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 520
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by X-Gaming
That was more towards TulipSystems making a comparison of his wife's desktop system which If his wife is anything like mine she doesn't run databases and websites off her desktop either 
Point being of course it may run fast at home but in a work enviroment it won't act the same. So the comparison is a moot point.
|
We use systems of the exact same specs for our low end boxes (semprons) and I'll tell you they perform extremely well in that application as well. Since the OP wasn't specifically asking about their perf in any specific situation I just gave one example, if anyone would like to see some benchmarks of a sempron 3100+ give me what you'd like run on one and I'll have a box put up for benchmarking.
|

07-24-2005, 03:46 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 656
|
|
I have to agree with Ryan, we do often use the seti@home client to benchmark CPUs and we've found amazing results on AMD boxes.
We recently set up a small sempron 2600 as a development server in our LAN and it performed better than the Celeron 2.4 that we were using (this development server is used to test VoIP applications).
__________________
Fabio A. Calderon
C.E.O.
SEATi
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
| Postbit Selector |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Login: |
|
|
| Advertisement: |
|
|
| Web Hosting News: |
|
|
|