Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : Hosting Software and Control Panels : control panles which is the BEST?

[mrkanitkar]

hi all,
I am mahesh,
working with ISP in INDIA.
we are builting new webserver on Linux 7.0.
I have seen some control panels.
But I need controlpanel which is fully user friendly for our customers as well as customisible also, with all features.
it should have http interface as well as commandline interface. also,
It should have webbased mail interface inbuilt.
I am searching for such control panel which is a better than cobalt raq control panel.
Pl.be in detail with experience .
Price is not a issue.
I hope I will get best help here.
regards,
mahehswar.
ICQ.25139532

[sodapopinski]

Hi,

Try http://www.cpanel.net

Thx.
Soda

[cbaker17]

We like http://www.plesk.com
but cpanel.net is good as well, although we have yet to test it.

[yadnum]

We use CPANEL (cpanel.net) and received nothing but praise from our customers. The ease of use and extensive features make it a neat little package.

[syanet]

Is CPanel something I could put on a RaQ to allw user access to their account?

[cbaker17]

No you cant put cpanel on a raq and why would you want to?

[syanet]

To allow customers to set up their own things.

[Chicken]

This doesn't make sense. I'm sure Charles is scratching his head at the recent posts about putting CP's on RaQs.

Point is, if you were to get *any* linux server, you could add cpanel and it would work fine. There is no reason to get a RaQ if you intend on using software like cpanel.

[syanet]

I'm scratching my head as well being new to this and such. I guess the naswer was more obvious then I though. Nevermind.

[Chicken]

Well, a RaQ is nothing more than a modified linux server (Cobalt's OS). It is kinda of like asking, "If I buy a MAC, can I load MS Windows on it?".

If you wanted Windows, you'd be better off just getting a Windows machine. Know what I mean?

Most people get the RaQ for the OS and the control panel, etc. You can get *any* server and put cpanel on it. You don't need both (nor would want both due to possible conflicts).

[syanet]

Makes sense now. Thanks.