Results 1 to 16 of 16
Thread: Ezzi - London link slow
-
06-26-2005, 08:14 AM #1Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- London
- Posts
- 887
Ezzi - London link slow
I'm only just getting 150KB/s from my server in Ezzi to London, UK.
Why have the links suddenly got so slow to Europe?...loading
-
06-26-2005, 08:17 AM #2Eternal Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 10,710
Did you contact EZZI?
Thanks,MediaLayer, LLC - www.medialayer.com Learn how we can make your website load faster, translating to better conversion rates for your business!
The pioneers of optimized web hosting, featuring LiteSpeed Web Server & SSD Storage - Celebrating 10 Years in Business
-
06-26-2005, 08:22 AM #3Managed Hosting Expert
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- North Yorkshire, UK
- Posts
- 4,164
AFAIK, Ezzi do not have any London peering, so it'll be a problem with a transit provider you're going trough.
Can you post us a traceroute.
If I remember rightly, Ezzi have dropped NAC, so your London traffic will be taking a different route.
Dan█ Dan Kitchen | Technical Director | Razorblue
█ ddi: (+44) (0)1748 900 680 | e: dkitchen@razorblue.com
█ UK Intensive Managed Hosting, Clusters and Colocation.
█ HP Servers, Cisco/Juniper Powered BGP Network (AS15692).
-
06-26-2005, 08:23 AM #4Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- London
- Posts
- 887
Nope. I'm just wondering if everyone is experiencing this aswell?
I've noticed a deterioration of service quality over the last few months and am possibly thinking of moving provider....loading
-
06-26-2005, 08:24 AM #5Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- London
- Posts
- 887
Tracing route to mydomain [<my ip>]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 20 ms 19 ms 19 ms loopback1.ar1.gs1.systems.pipex.net [62.241.161.
247]
2 17 ms 19 ms 25 ms ge-0-0-0.cr1.gs1.systems.pipex.net [62.241.161.9
0]
3 19 ms 19 ms 17 ms ge1-0.mr02.ldn01.pccwbtn.net [217.79.160.127]
4 108 ms 111 ms 110 ms wvfiber.ge2-2.br01.atl01.pccwbtn.net [63.216.31.
138]
5 108 ms 109 ms 111 ms unknown63223008049.wvfiber.net [63.223.8.49]
6 110 ms 109 ms 111 ms c00.atl.pos1-36-1.wvfiber.net [63.223.8.57]
7 110 ms 152 ms 109 ms unknown632230110.wvfiber.net [63.223.1.10]
8 120 ms 117 ms 117 ms b0-00.nyc.pos1-26-1.wvfiber.net [63.223.2.58]
9 114 ms 115 ms 115 ms c00.ny2.pos4-0.wvfiber.net [63.223.28.10]
10 116 ms 114 ms 117 ms unknown63223028138.wvfiber.net [63.223.28.138]
11 116 ms 116 ms 117 ms 65.125.239.146
12 118 ms 117 ms 118 ms <my ip>
Trace complete.
---
This wvfiber route I am now taking sucks.
I'm 99% sure that I have never taken the wvfiber route before. It used to be something like peer1 or nac...loading
-
06-26-2005, 08:24 AM #6Eternal Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 10,710
The traceroute doesn't particulirly (SP) look bad.
Thanks,MediaLayer, LLC - www.medialayer.com Learn how we can make your website load faster, translating to better conversion rates for your business!
The pioneers of optimized web hosting, featuring LiteSpeed Web Server & SSD Storage - Celebrating 10 Years in Business
-
06-26-2005, 08:26 AM #7Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- London
- Posts
- 887
Yes, but the seems over the wvfiber link are not good at all.
Also ping yeilds around 115ms. before it used to be round 90ms....loading
-
06-26-2005, 08:35 AM #8Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 296
I wonder why it's not picking up Peer1 in London and going straight to NYC that way. The WVfiber link looks weird, going London, Atlanta then NYC.
-
06-26-2005, 08:36 AM #9Managed Hosting Expert
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- North Yorkshire, UK
- Posts
- 4,164
Doesn't look too bad although they do seem to have a lot more routers (rather than MPLS tunnels).
Only bad thing I can see here is that it's going Atlanta > NY ... so going further then coming back again.
My trace:
Code:H:\>tracert www.ezzi.net Tracing route to www.ezzi.net [66.199.230.23] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms fe3-2-ac1.dur.uk.razorblue.com [82.163.169.81] 2 1 ms 2 ms 1 ms fe2-1-cr1.dur.uk.razorblue.com [82.163.169.99] 3 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms london-access-fe1.uk.razorblue.com [82.163.175.85] 4 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms 82.163.0.1 5 18 ms 18 ms 18 ms ge-3-5.a01.londen03.uk.ra.verio.net [213.130.48.5] 6 19 ms 19 ms 19 ms ge-1-0-0-4.r20.londen03.uk.bb.verio.net [213.130.47.65] 7 88 ms 89 ms 89 ms p16-0-0-0.r81.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.2.134] 8 88 ms 91 ms 92 ms p16-1-1-3.r21.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.5.36] 9 89 ms 92 ms 92 ms p16-7-0-0.r04.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net [129.250.3.49] 10 99 ms 99 ms 96 ms 129.250.9.210 11 96 ms 96 ms 95 ms jfk-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.230.22] 12 98 ms 97 ms 96 ms jfk-edge-19.inet.qwest.net [205.171.30.181] 13 97 ms 99 ms 99 ms mail.bpa-mcs.com [63.237.128.98] 14 99 ms 99 ms 99 ms ezzi.net [66.199.230.23] Trace complete.
█ Dan Kitchen | Technical Director | Razorblue
█ ddi: (+44) (0)1748 900 680 | e: dkitchen@razorblue.com
█ UK Intensive Managed Hosting, Clusters and Colocation.
█ HP Servers, Cisco/Juniper Powered BGP Network (AS15692).
-
06-26-2005, 11:08 AM #10Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 325
Originally posted by Georgecooldude
Yes, but the seems over the wvfiber link are not good at all..
-
06-26-2005, 01:15 PM #11Disabled
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 491
On another thread, Take-It-Ezzi noted that NAC is only used as backup now. That is probably why you experienced a service deterioration since you're now going over WVFiber rather then NAC, who I believe has a POP in London. Take-It-Ezzi did note that if you used to go over NAC, and are now experiencing problems, to open up a ticket. Perhaps if they get enough complaints from overseers, they will put NAC back up.
-
06-26-2005, 01:52 PM #12Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- Kirkland, WA
- Posts
- 4,448
Yep - the lack of NAC in their network will definitely hurt their routes across the pond.
-
06-26-2005, 03:22 PM #13Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Location
- Manchester, UK
- Posts
- 289
that trace doesnt look that bad
is it just 1 specific server in London thats slowed down for you or have you tried a few over here?
whats your trace like to www.openhosting.co.uk?Technical Director, M247
Premium web and Internet infrastructure services from M247.com
M247 is actively buying Helm3 customer base - cash waiting.
-
06-26-2005, 05:57 PM #14Web Hosting Guru
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 296
Peer1 one has a pop in London too though you'd think that would help minimized any issues.
-
06-26-2005, 06:07 PM #15Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Posts
- 1,769
Originally posted by Georgecooldude
Nope. I'm just wondering if everyone is experiencing this aswell?
I've noticed a deterioration of service quality over the last few months and am possibly thinking of moving provider.[QuickPacket™] [AS46261]
Located in Ashburn, VA, Los Angeles, CA, Chicago, IL, and Manchester, UK
Since 2003 - 20+ Years! Dedicated Servers, Co-location, DDoS Filtering, Data Backup & More!
-
06-26-2005, 08:38 PM #16Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Posts
- 4,980
Yea, this is not support forum for Ezzi, try contact them through the official mean.