Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 38 of 38
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    44
    Originally posted by KarlZimmer
    Though I wouldn't really jump to conclusions based on one trace.
    of course...

    3 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms montpellier-6k-1-a5.routers.proxad.net [213.228.12.62]
    4 7 ms 8 ms 9 ms marseille-6k-1-v802.intf.routers.proxad.net [212.27.50.94]
    5 12 ms 12 ms 12 ms lyon-6k-1-v804.intf.routers.proxad.net [212.27.50.102]
    6 18 ms 18 ms * th2-6k-2-v812.intf.routers.proxad.net [212.27.50.113]
    7 19 ms 21 ms 20 ms router.cogentco.com [212.27.38.190]
    8 31 ms 29 ms 30 ms p13-0.core01.lon02.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.1.121]
    9 100 ms 125 ms 107 ms p10-0.core01.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.0.46]
    10 123 ms 122 ms 123 ms p5-0.core01.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.110]
    11 122 ms 123 ms 123 ms p15-0.core02.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.62]
    12 153 ms 140 ms 144 ms p12-0.core01.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.33]
    13 147 ms 148 ms 147 ms p12-0.core01.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.105]
    14 153 ms 153 ms 154 ms Alpha.demarc.cogentco.com [38.112.4.158]
    15 157 ms 149 ms 180 ms 66.28.206.119




    3 6 ms 5 ms 5 ms montpellier-6k-1-a5.routers.proxad.net [213.228.12.62]
    4 12 ms 8 ms 8 ms marseille-6k-1-v802.intf.routers.proxad.net [212.27.50.94]
    5 12 ms 12 ms 12 ms lyon-6k-1-v804.intf.routers.proxad.net [212.27.50.102]
    6 19 ms 18 ms 19 ms th2-6k-2-v812.intf.routers.proxad.net [212.27.50.113]
    7 19 ms 31 ms 19 ms router.cogentco.com [212.27.38.190]
    8 31 ms 30 ms 30 ms p13-0.core01.lon02.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.1.121]
    9 101 ms 101 ms 101 ms p10-0.core01.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.0.46]
    10 123 ms 138 ms 122 ms p5-0.core01.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.110]
    11 122 ms 127 ms 124 ms p15-0.core02.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.62]
    12 140 ms 143 ms 168 ms p12-0.core01.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.33]
    13 147 ms 148 ms 167 ms p12-0.core01.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.105]
    14 148 ms 148 ms 147 ms Alpha.demarc.cogentco.com [38.112.4.158]
    15 172 ms 150 ms 155 ms 66.28.206.119
    not that bad...

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    6,957
    Originally posted by Phach
    of course...

    not that bad...
    Yeah, in general their traces seem fine, except the one Cogent Dallas issue, which I have noted on several traces:

    Qwest Dallas:
    1 dal-svcs-01 (205.171.25.196) 0.493 ms 0.302 ms 0.264 ms
    2 dal-core-01 (205.171.225.34) 0.352 ms 0.330 ms 9.251 ms
    3 dap-brdr-01 (205.171.225.49) 1.489 ms 1.467 ms 1.421 ms
    4 p9-0.core01.dfw03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.10.125) 26.307 ms 23.582 ms 21.897 ms
    5 p11-0.core01.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.189) 24.372 ms 24.690 ms 26.051 ms
    6 p13-0.core01.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.98) 31.813 ms 25.003 ms 24.598 ms
    7 Alpha.demarc.cogentco.com (38.112.4.158) 24.860 ms 24.705 ms 25.850 ms
    8 66.28.206.119 (66.28.206.119) 26.108 ms 26.045 ms 27.390 ms

    Level(3) Dallas:
    1 ae-1-51.bbr1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.122.1) 0 msec
    ae-1-55.bbr1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.122.129) 0 msec
    ae-1-53.bbr1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.122.65) 0 msec
    2 so-6-0-0.edge2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.96.118) 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
    3 cogent-level3-oc48.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.127.14) 0 msec 0 msec 4 msec
    4 p11-0.core01.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.189) [AS174 {COGENT}] 256 msec 112 msec 4 msec
    5 p13-0.core01.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.98) [AS174 {COGENT}] 4 msec 92 msec 92 msec
    6 Alpha.demarc.cogentco.com (38.112.12.246) [AS174 {COGENT}] 4 msec 8 msec 4 msec
    7 66.28.206.119 [AS174 {COGENT}] 8 msec 8 msec 8 msec


    Add in the Global Crossing trace from before and it seems pretty consistant.
    Karl Zimmerman - Founder & CEO of Steadfast
    VMware Virtual Data Center Platform

    karl @ steadfast.net - Sales/Support: 312-602-2689
    Cloud Hosting, Managed Dedicated Servers, Chicago Colocation, and New Jersey Colocation

  3. #28
    I've been speaking to one of their members of staff and they have an offer on the 2+2 20Mbps server. If I pay for 2months, I get 2 months free. If i pay for 6months, I get 6months free, so that $1000 for a years worth of Managed, dedicated, 20Mbps server.

    Surley theres something wrong there?

  4. #29
    200kbps from OF now, its getting better heh.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    6,957
    Originally posted by smoove.
    I've been speaking to one of their members of staff and they have an offer on the 2+2 20Mbps server. If I pay for 2months, I get 2 months free. If i pay for 6months, I get 6months free, so that $1000 for a years worth of Managed, dedicated, 20Mbps server.

    Surley theres something wrong there?
    Reminds me of the AngelNetworkz deals... If the company has a good track record and you feel good with them you might want to go for it long-term. If they are new or a reseller I'd likely stay away.
    Karl Zimmerman - Founder & CEO of Steadfast
    VMware Virtual Data Center Platform

    karl @ steadfast.net - Sales/Support: 312-602-2689
    Cloud Hosting, Managed Dedicated Servers, Chicago Colocation, and New Jersey Colocation

  6. #31
    In costs per GB, I haven't found anything even close to the 2+2, which is why I'm ordering it.

  7. #32
    They are new by the looks of things, it's only about 6months old.
    When ordering a server, it doesnt offer a proper payment method, just my outlook client to email them. Not very proffesional?

  8. #33
    They have no PAYMENT SYSTEM at this time. But it's ok, I only care about their NETWORK SYSTEM

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    296
    For those of you with really bad speed tests earlier today, go ahead and try out the same links again. They will be much better, which just proves that their links are completed saturated during the day. I really hope once they get more capacity in that they don't oversell this badly again.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Door County, Wisconsin
    Posts
    321
    We have a server pushing 120Mbps AVG, peaking during the day. The server never has packet loss or high pings. Buffers are just as fast during the day as they are during the night, it just seems that some switches may be saturated. Contacting OF would be your best bet to correct this problem.
    Christian Koehler
    Racked Hosting
    Web Hosting, Unmetered Dedicated Hosting and SHOUTcast Hosting
    +1.866.5RACKED (ext. 802)

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    296
    It's not the switch I can max out the 100mbit nic receiving or sending from other servers at OF.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Door County, Wisconsin
    Posts
    321
    At all times during the day? Are those other servers on the same switch as the problem server?
    Christian Koehler
    Racked Hosting
    Web Hosting, Unmetered Dedicated Hosting and SHOUTcast Hosting
    +1.866.5RACKED (ext. 802)

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    296
    Yep I can max out the nic from any other server on the OF network at all times during the day. Even when the speeds out of OF are bad during the day. The ones I've tested to are on different switches. You said you were doing 120mbit all the time? The only thing I can think of is they are giving priority to the people with gig nic's.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •