Results 1 to 18 of 18
Thread: 95th Percentile
-
04-27-2005, 01:39 PM #1Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 175
95th Percentile
if this is my typical day what would my 95th percentile look like?
www[dot]innersoul[dot]us/oneday.png
I can't seem to post a message to another site so let me give it a few....
-
04-27-2005, 02:01 PM #2Account Suspended
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Nevada
- Posts
- 887
I think you left out a subdirectory... I found this http://www.innersoul.us/images/oneday.png
If it is this one, then would guess around 160 kbps for 95th
-
04-27-2005, 02:14 PM #3Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 175
Originally posted by Dennis Nugent
I think you left out a subdirectory... I found this deleted
If it is this one, then would guess around 160 kbps for 95th
-
04-27-2005, 02:16 PM #4Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 175
I need to post this differently because it appears I can't edit my post. Are you sure you don't mean 160KBps? :whistles waiting for the timelimit to expire:
EDIT: Ah it appears I tried to edit the wrong post LOL
-
04-27-2005, 03:14 PM #5CISSP-ISSMP, CISA
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Seattle
- Posts
- 5,525
My guess would be around 150 kbps, and no I do not mean KBps as your max peak according to that graph is only 204 kbps.
-
04-27-2005, 04:19 PM #6Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2000
- Location
- Sheffield, South Yorks
- Posts
- 3,627
150KB/s if I had to guess from the looks of it.
Karl Austin :: KDAWS.com
The Agency Hosting Specialist :: 0800 5429 764
Partner with us and free-up more time for income generating tasks
-
04-27-2005, 04:40 PM #7Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 175
Originally posted by NSCNAP Jeff
My guess would be around 150 kbps, and no I do not mean KBps as your max peak according to that graph is only 204 kbps.
Read the scale on the left of the page. The mtrg graph is scaled in Bytes.
And actually my peak usage is about 300KBps because I have just as much outgoing as I have incoming. That is what I read but maybe I am reading it wrong. The server is running game servers so each connected player will send and receive about 3.5KBps of data.
-
04-27-2005, 05:01 PM #8Backup Guru
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- New York, NY
- Posts
- 4,618
Since your graph is in Bytes/s and not Bits/s, you're looking at about 1.3Mbps....slightly under the capcity of a T1.
Scott Burns, President
BQ Internet Corporation
Remote Rsync and FTP backup solutions
*** http://www.bqbackup.com/ ***
-
04-27-2005, 05:19 PM #9Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 175
Originally posted by bqinternet
Since your graph is in Bytes/s and not Bits/s, you're looking at about 1.3Mbps....slightly under the capcity of a T1.
-
04-27-2005, 05:28 PM #10Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 46
A t1 is 1.54Mbps full duplex.
-
04-27-2005, 05:54 PM #11Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 175
Ah. I always just thought it was 1.54Mbps maximum throughput.
-
04-27-2005, 05:58 PM #12Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 464
I think some people thought KBps was a typo. Normally you see "b" as in bits when talking speed (A T-1 is 1.54Kbps) and "B" when talking about storage or total transit (We offer 1000GB of transfer).
Oh no, some less than honest provider just got an idea to offer servers with 1000G of transfer, and say in the Terms and Conditions that it is 1000Gb, not GB.Looking for next opportunity
-
04-27-2005, 06:02 PM #13Junior Guru Wannabe
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 46
thats Mbps not Kbps
1.54 Mbps
-
04-27-2005, 06:08 PM #14Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 7
I always assumed that a T-1's worth of data was 1.544 mbps. But when my local CLEC provided the service to a local client the T-1 was on a ATM backbone and only provided around 1.3 mbps. You lose over 200k when provisioned over a ATM backbone.
Rick
-
04-27-2005, 06:23 PM #15Web Hosting Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2000
- Location
- Sheffield, South Yorks
- Posts
- 3,627
Yes, ATMs small cell size means there is a large percentage of overhead per cell, in relation to a typical Ethernet frame for example.
Karl Austin :: KDAWS.com
The Agency Hosting Specialist :: 0800 5429 764
Partner with us and free-up more time for income generating tasks
-
04-27-2005, 07:22 PM #16Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 175
Would seem like a decent deal for 149 a month if it wasnt for the large amount of packetloss I have during the day. If all I was doing was hosting this would be great. During the day however I have about 10 to 15% packetloss causing my cs servers to be unplayable. The maximum I have pushed through this connection is about 4.5MB per second.
-
04-27-2005, 10:55 PM #17Web Hosting Evangelist
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 464
I did say 1.54Kbps instead of Mbps. See, we all get sideways on this one.
DaSoul, you have to look at your needs in deciding if this is a good deal. I have many customers that cannot handle packet loss. For them 1% is too much. There are others that come to us wanting a cheap price for a lot of bandwidth, but they are okay with a little loss. If you are okay with 10-15% packet loss and they are providing it at a price point acceptable to you, then life is good.
$149 for 1.3Mbps with 10-15% packet loss seems a bit high to me. It all depends on your customers.Looking for next opportunity
-
04-27-2005, 11:32 PM #18Junior Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 175
Originally posted by pvanmeter
I did say 1.54Kbps instead of Mbps. See, we all get sideways on this one.
DaSoul, you have to look at your needs in deciding if this is a good deal. I have many customers that cannot handle packet loss. For them 1% is too much. There are others that come to us wanting a cheap price for a lot of bandwidth, but they are okay with a little loss. If you are okay with 10-15% packet loss and they are providing it at a price point acceptable to you, then life is good.
$149 for 1.3Mbps with 10-15% packet loss seems a bit high to me. It all depends on your customers.