hosted by liquidweb


Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : Colocation and Data Centers : Jumbo Frames...
Reply

Forum Jump

Jumbo Frames...

Reply Post New Thread In Colocation and Data Centers Subscription
 
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6

Jumbo Frames...


Does anyone know of any providers offering jumbo frames?



Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 1,083
That's an unusual question, but probably not a useful one. Even if you configure your own infrastructure with jumbo frame support, and your provider does the same, chances are that the huge majority of end-users will not be able to receive jumbo frames. Transit circuits, peering exchanges, and end-customer interfaces are going to have smaller MTU sizes which will simply result in TCP PMTUd selecting an MSS that is substantially smaller than the frame size your wire supports.

If you disable PMTUd and simply transit jumbo frames, and TCP segments, with don't-fragment unset, you will just cause fragmentation somewhere in your upstream path; and this can harm performance for end-users when, for example, a fragment is discarded and whole IP packet cannot be reassembled at the far-end. The entire TCP segment must be retransmitted. Supporting jumbo frames can be a big headache for virtually no gain.

What is your application? Have you logged advertised TCP MSS value on sessions from your user base to determine if jumbo frames can be a benefit even under ideal transit network circumstance?

__________________
Jeff at Innovative Network Concepts / 212-981-0607 x8579 / AIM: jeffsw6
Expert IP network consultation and operation at affordable rates
95th Percentile Explained Rate-Limiting on Cisco IOS switches

  #3  
Old
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
Well I believe it to be very useful for me. Since the application is ftp, it matters not what the MTU is at the end point. I want to get data off my box/boxes as quickly and efficiently as possible. Since PCs do not have ASIC chips that do fragmentation in hardware, I want the upstream routers to do this. I can easily save 30-50% overhead on my box/boxes with high one way traffic (HTTP, FTP, etc) using jumbo frames.

Still, my question remains...

Sponsored Links
  #4  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 1,083
I suspect you'll find that most hosting companies with knowledgable network operations staff will be able to support mini-jumbo frames with relative ease; but it doesn't sound like that would give you the performance benefit you're looking for. Getting into the 9KB range may be challenging depending on the hardware they use to terminate your ethernet circuit.

I've evaluated this on some of my clients' networks, and those I've looked at in detail could not accomodate your need unless you were to commit enough traffic to warrant landing your circuit on a rather expensive layer 3 interface. I suspect you'll find that to be the case with most vendors that you contact.

I understand your desire to both reduce the number of transmitted segments and ACKs that must be processed by your server(s); however I can't imagine this being such a large benefit that it would motivate you to choose certain service providers based on their ability to provide a jumbo-capable handoff.

Have you considered offloading the fragmentation duties onto another box of your own, for example an additional PC, layer 3 switch, or router that can bear your traffic? I don't see this as being a cost/performance win, either; I'm just throwing an option out.

__________________
Jeff at Innovative Network Concepts / 212-981-0607 x8579 / AIM: jeffsw6
Expert IP network consultation and operation at affordable rates
95th Percentile Explained Rate-Limiting on Cisco IOS switches

  #5  
Old
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,780
It's doable. But Jeff is correct, you're going to get a port charge for this simply because your drop would be provision directly from the router or the core. Both tends to have expensive per port cost.

__________________
http://Ethr.net jay@ethr.net
West Coast AT&T / Level3 / Savvis Bandwidth, Colocation, Dedicated Server, Managed IP Service, Hardware Load Balancing Service, Transport Service, 365 Main St, SFO / 200 Paul Ave, SFO / PAIX, PAO / Market Post Tower, 55 S. Market, SJC / 11 Great Oaks, Equinix, SJC

Reply

Related posts from TheWhir.com
Title Type Date Posted
Square Enix to Create On-Demand Cloud Gaming Platform Web Hosting News 2013-11-06 10:00:55
New Moves in Multi-Player Online Game Hosting Web Hosting News 2014-05-09 12:40:24
Mozilla Firefox 23 Will Block Mix SSL Content by Default Web Hosting News 2013-04-12 11:39:07


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Login:
Log in with your username and password
Username:
Password:



Forgot Password?
WHT Host Brief Email:

We respect your privacy. We will never sell, rent, or give away your address to any outside party, ever.

Advertisement:
Web Hosting News:
WHT Membership
WHT Membership



 

X

Welcome to WebHostingTalk.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

WebHostingTalk.com is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?