Page 2 of 82 FirstFirst 123451252 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 2040
  1. #26
    Dual Xeon 2.4 w/HT 2G RAM 80G HDD (2mb)
    Fedora Core1 with CPanel

    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux serv4 2.4.22-1.2197.nptlsmp #1 SMP Thu Jul 1 15:05:23 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/hda2 77245668 8125776 65196016 12% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 12 19:31:59 GMT 2004
    19:31:59 up 12:14, 1 user, load average: 0.25, 0.11, 0.10

    End Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 12 19:42:18 GMT 2004
    19:42:18 up 12:24, 1 user, load average: 16.77, 6.80, 2.96


    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 7855982.8 208.5
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 546.3 65.7
    Execl Throughput 188.3 4814.8 255.7
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 29109.0 108.9
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 7372.0 68.4
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 522488.0 339.7
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 1082177.3 96.8
    Process Creation 569.3 15114.2 265.5
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 802.0 179.0
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 1056997.4 92.4
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 143.8
    Last edited by fhost; 08-12-2004 at 03:53 PM.
      0 Not allowed!

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    2,761
    Originally posted by pingles
    To be honest, I don't actually know. They're the standard 80gigs that LayeredTech put in
    Yeah, those drives seem to do very well on the tests. Our 2.8 LT machine was very fast for the HD test, as well. I'm having Matt run the new test and post it.

    -Josh
      0 Not allowed!

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    338
    NEMON - you're running FreeBSD 5.2.1, which is not tuned for production environment. I've read that its kernel has many debugging options turned on. Perhaps they are slowing down your server. Your benchmark is fine except for low score in new process spawning, which points to the kernel.
      0 Not allowed!

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    DC
    Posts
    3,643
    P4 2.8Ghz, 1GB RAM:
    Code:
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  4276167.9      113.5
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      796.0       95.8
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     3815.8      202.6
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    52244.0      195.5
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0    23872.0      221.7
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   257326.0      167.3
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6   223021.0      144.4
    Process Creation                               569.3    16825.4      295.5
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      510.0      113.8
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5   456131.9       39.9
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                     140.9
    P4 2.4 w/HT, 512MB RAM
    Code:
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  3707477.3       98.4
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      476.8       57.4
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     2417.3      128.4
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    35778.0      133.9
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     9645.0       89.6
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   593592.0      385.9
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   681399.8       60.9
    Process Creation                               569.3     5435.0       95.5
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      165.9       37.0
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5   472183.9       41.3
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                      88.6
    - Matt
      0 Not allowed!

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    338
    Matt - could you also post the few lines above the index scores that show your system load before and after the benchmark?
      0 Not allowed!

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    DC
    Posts
    3,643
    Originally posted by Yikes2000
    Matt - could you also post the few lines above the index scores that show your system load before and after the benchmark?
    Sorry about that, I already closed it down... starting loads were both roughly 0, I think final loads were about 16 or something... can't remember correctly though.

    Here's what I just ran on my PII 350Mhz with 384MB RAM:
    Code:
    Start Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 12 16:10:27 EDT 2004
     16:10:27  up 18 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.20, 0.05, 0.03
    
    End Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 12 16:21:55 EDT 2004
     16:21:55  up 30 min,  1 user,  load average: 16.14, 6.81, 3.04
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7   751655.7       19.9
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      200.7       24.2
    Execl Throughput                               188.3      610.0       32.4
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0     7054.0       26.4
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     2326.0       21.6
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0    57295.0       37.2
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   144797.8       12.9
    Process Creation                               569.3     1785.5       31.4
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8       75.9       16.9
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5   153239.2       13.4
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                      22.3
    - Matt
      0 Not allowed!

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    338
    Matt - thanks for posting your results. Is your P4 2.4 w/HT (512MB RAM) server by any chance running a lot of idle programs? They may take up memory space, which adversely affect new process creation and disk I/O (swapping). The score is lower than I expected for P4 2.4 w/HT.
      0 Not allowed!

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    DC
    Posts
    3,643
    Originally posted by Yikes2000
    Matt - thanks for posting your results. Is your P4 2.4 w/HT (512MB RAM) server by any chance running a lot of idle programs? They may take up memory space, which adversely affect new process creation and disk I/O (swapping). The score is lower than I expected for P4 2.4 w/HT.
    Nothing looks out of the ordinary on my server:

    4:51pm up 28 days, 17:27, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.05, 0.14
    144 processes: 143 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
    CPU0 states: 8.0% user, 3.2% system, 0.0% nice, 88.1% idle
    CPU1 states: 0.2% user, 1.0% system, 0.0% nice, 98.2% idle
    Mem: 511952K av, 482860K used, 29092K free, 0K shrd, 77220K buff
    Swap: 1052216K av, 115688K used, 936528K free 215444K cached

    Anybody else have a P4 2.4 w/HT and 512MB RAM to test?

    - Matt
      0 Not allowed!

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    PA, USA
    Posts
    5,143
    Will the score be affected by the OS it runs? Will similarly configured server running FreeBSD performs as well as if it were running RedHat?
    Fluid Hosting, LLC - Enterprise Cloud Infrastructure: Cloud Shared and Reseller, Cloud VPS, and Cloud Hybrid Server
      0 Not allowed!

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    338
    Yes, OS will affect the score. To what extend? That's open to debate. And let's not start a FreeBSD vs. ReHat thread here. I'd expect the scores to be comparable if the kernel and OS is fully utilizing the resources of a server.
      0 Not allowed!

  11. #36
    It is a good initiative but shouldn't all those servers be idle to get a relevant comparison ?
    That could mean a apachectl stop on dedicated server but that might not be enough on a vps as the host server might still be busy.
    Or am i mistaking and unixbench is eating over 90% of system resources and the test is relevant indeed ?
    Please coment on this.
      0 Not allowed!

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    338
    In the VPS environment, each VPS competes with other VPS's for CPU cycles and other system resources. Thus running UnixBench in one VPS will reveal how busy the server really is, and the level of performance to be expected for that particular VPS. Otherwise there is no way to tell. Despite the impressive server hardware and the guarantee on RAM and CPU MHz, VPS performance vary greatly as evident by these results. VPS clients could also use this benchmark periodically as "checkups".

    As for dedicated servers, you're correct. Ideally one would shutdown all services before running the benchmark. The result then measures the performance capability for that particular server. However, running the benchmark under normal load is also useful in fine tuning the server. When the benchmark score is significantly lower than another comparable server, one should consider these actions: (1) check program settings (Apache, MySQL), (2) upgrade the server (more RAM, faster HD, RAID0, or faster CPU).

    As long as these results are accompanied by descriptions of server states and hardware, they will be useful reference points.
      0 Not allowed!

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sofia
    Posts
    1,354
    [/somedir/unixbench-4.1.0-wht]# ./Run
    -bash: ./Run: /bin/sh: bad interpreter: Permission denied

    :-((((
      0 Not allowed!

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sofia
    Posts
    1,354
    Dual Xeon 2.8 HT, 2x120 HDD ATA, 1 GB RAM
    Code:
    Start Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 13 09:32:38 GMT 2004
     09:32:38  up 31 days,  2:42,  1 user,  load average: 0.53, 0.42, 0.28
    
    End Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 13 09:43:09 GMT 2004
     09:43:09  up 31 days,  2:53,  1 user,  load average: 18.57, 7.91, 3.62
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  8696751.9      230.8
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      564.1       67.9
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     4069.0      216.1
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    29327.0      109.8
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     7939.0       73.7
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   454278.0      295.3
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6  1175269.4      105.1
    Process Creation                               569.3     9728.9      170.9
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      467.1      104.3
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5  1104350.7       96.5
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                     130.8
    Run only once
      0 Not allowed!

  15. #40
    Result is a bit strange to me...

    Dual PIII 1 Ghz, 1 GB RAM, SCSI drives

    Code:
    Start Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 13 03:39:03 PDT 2004
      3:39am  up 161 days,  2:45,  1 user,  load average: 0.75, 0.71, 0.61
    
    End Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 13 03:50:21 PDT 2004
      3:50am  up 161 days,  2:56,  1 user,  load average: 16.37, 7.32, 3.64
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  3466882.2       92.0
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      547.7       65.9
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     1265.5       67.2
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    35125.0      131.5
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0    19808.0      183.9
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   151982.0       98.8
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   670041.3       59.9
    Process Creation                               569.3     4983.3       87.5
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      263.9       58.9
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5   751369.2       65.7
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                      85.0
      0 Not allowed!

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    338
    Originally posted by Walter
    Result is a bit strange to me...

    Dual PIII 1 Ghz, 1 GB RAM, SCSI drives[/code]
    How so strange? Your result is comparable to my Dual P3 1GHz (on page 1 of this thread). Your server is a bit busier than mine to start with, but made it up with faster SCSI drives.
      0 Not allowed!

  17. #42
    Originally posted by Yikes2000
    How so strange? Your result is comparable to my Dual P3 1GHz (on page 1 of this thread). Your server is a bit busier than mine to start with, but made it up with faster SCSI drives.
    Oh, sorry, I missed your Dual P3 on the 1st page
    I expected a bit more...
      0 Not allowed!

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    70
    Dual Xeon 2.8 with 2GB Ram with 2x73GB SCSI (non raid) with Cpanel

    All services idle and running.

    Code:
    Start Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 13 13:13:04 CDT 2004
     13:13:04  up  1:36,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
    
    End Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 13 13:23:17 CDT 2004
     13:23:17  up  1:46,  2 users,  load average: 14.81, 6.26, 2.70
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  9083303.6      241.1
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      557.2       67.1
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     4809.2      255.4
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    79986.0      299.3
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0    26236.0      243.6
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   440356.0      286.3
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6  1575489.9      140.9
    Process Creation                               569.3    15281.4      268.4
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      550.8      122.9
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5  1339028.6      117.0
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                     185.0
    Last edited by sungkim; 08-13-2004 at 02:31 PM.
      0 Not allowed!

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Barrington and Peoria, Illinois, USA
    Posts
    318
    Sorry if this is a stupid question, but is a higher score better? Also, is there any conclusion to VPS being able to hold its own against dedicated servers?
    Jeff Link - jeff.link@intrahost.com
    NewLinkOne.com - Resell Domains and we handle billing!
      0 Not allowed!

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    338
    Higher score is better. So far, VPS underperforms dedicated servers. But VPS makes it for it with managed support and backups. See the original benchmark thread (link on page 1) for more discussion.
      0 Not allowed!

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    72
    Would be interested in seeing the results from a couple differnet VPS hosts - I've done Adiungo... but what about Linode, Tektonic, Westhost (if there are any here that use them) etc.... just as a comparison between hosts.
      0 Not allowed!

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    52
    Different hardware node this time:

    Code:
    Fluid Hosting VPS "Starter" (166Mhz/192MB RAM guaranteed, 2.8Ghz/2GB RAM burst)
    Host server: Dual P3 1.4Ghz, 2GB RAM, SCSI
    ==============================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- Linux 2.4.20-020stab009.10.777-enterprise #1 SMP 
    Thu Feb 19 10:57:25 MSK 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    vzfs                   3072000    233916   2838084   8% /
    
    Start Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 13 18:33:43 EDT 2004
     18:33:43  up 22:21,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
    
    End Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 13 18:46:46 EDT 2004
     18:46:46  up 22:34,  1 user,  load average: 14.86, 6.16, 2.83
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES            
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  4597476.9      122.0
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      745.7       89.7
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     2109.5      112.0
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0     4632.0       17.3
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     2823.0       26.2
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   151985.0       98.8
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   307817.1       27.5
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6    79308.4       51.3
    Process Creation                               569.3     3091.8       54.3
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      340.8       76.1
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5   190008.9       16.6
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                      50.4
    Richard Park
      0 Not allowed!

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    338
    Wow... Hyperthreading makes FreeBSD 4.10 run slower!!!

    Test System: CalPOP P4 3.0 GHz, 1GB RAM, 3Ware SATA RAID1

    SMP Kernel with Hyperthreading turned on:
    Code:
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- T3-CalPOP
    /dev/twed0s1f 101976878 1011958 92806770     1%    /usr
    
    Start Benchmark Run: Sun Aug 15 01:06:23 PDT 2004
     1:06AM  up 26 mins, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.99, 1.31
    
    End Benchmark Run: Sun Aug 15 01:17:04 PDT 2004
     1:17AM  up 37 mins, 1 user, load averages: 13.68, 5.58, 3.14
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES            
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  4982586.1      132.2
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      686.3       82.6
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     1475.4       78.4
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    11652.0       43.6
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     7226.0       67.1
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   244805.0      159.2
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   639975.1       57.2
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6    68059.4       44.1
    Process Creation                               569.3     4214.5       74.0
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      604.8      135.0
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5   477307.2       41.7
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                      74.9
    UP Kernel without Hyperthreading
    Code:
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht)
    System -- T3-CalPOP
    /dev/twed0s1f 101976878 1011772 92806956     1%    /usr
    
    Start Benchmark Run: Sun Aug 15 01:25:34 PDT 2004
     1:25AM  up 1 min, 1 user, load averages: 0.06, 0.03, 0.01
    
    End Benchmark Run: Sun Aug 15 01:37:02 PDT 2004
     1:37AM  up 13 mins, 1 user, load averages: 13.58, 5.43, 2.51
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES            
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  4028271.1      106.9
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      921.2      110.9
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     2121.4      112.7
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0     9792.0       36.6
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0    14739.0      136.9
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   408951.0      265.9
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6   659658.3       59.0
    Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6   207631.1      134.4
    Process Creation                               569.3     8500.0      149.3
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      610.9      136.4
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5   433099.2       37.8
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                     100.8
    I research the issue in the FreeBSD-SMP Mailinglist. Apparently it is true... " There are also FreeBSD factors: FreeBSD 4 compiled with SMP, avoids a lot of locking code. FreeBSD 4 with SMP has a lot of extra locking code, and that code has cost associated with it. The cost of SMP locking in FreeBSD 4, may out way the benefit of HTT. With FreeBSD 5, the SMP locking is done quite differently, and it is done all the time anyhow (since FreeBSD 5 is SMP by default). So HTT on FreeBSD 5 is more likely to be beneficial than HTT on FreeBSD 4 (with a non SMP kernel)."
      0 Not allowed!

  24. #49
    Another two servers.
    Obviously the benchmark does not make use of more RAM

    Code:
    Dual Xeon 2.8 Ghz, 1 GB RAM, SCSI drives
    Start Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 16 03:24:33 CDT 2004
     03:24:33  up 17:43,  1 user,  load average: 0.06, 0.02, 0.00
    
    End Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 16 03:34:57 CDT 2004
     03:34:57  up 17:54,  1 user,  load average: 17.24, 6.79, 2.89
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  9274075.6      246.1
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      574.0       69.1
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     4571.9      242.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    25566.0       95.7
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     7069.0       65.6
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   338965.0      220.4
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6  1225956.0      109.6
    Process Creation                               569.3    10943.8      192.2
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      520.8      116.3
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5  1221342.4      106.7
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                     131.0

    Code:
    Dual Xeon 2.8 Ghz, 2 GB RAM, SCSI drives
    Start Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 16 03:25:43 CDT 2004
     03:25:43  up 1 day,  7:03,  1 user,  load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00
    
    End Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 16 03:36:05 CDT 2004
     03:36:05  up 1 day,  7:14,  1 user,  load average: 18.51, 7.27, 3.07
    
    
                         INDEX VALUES
    TEST                                        BASELINE     RESULT      INDEX
    
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7  9248307.6      245.5
    Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1      601.4       72.4
    Execl Throughput                               188.3     4580.5      243.3
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0    25269.0       94.6
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           1077.0     7110.0       66.0
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        15382.0   330047.0      214.6
    Pipe Throughput                             111814.6  1232795.4      110.3
    Process Creation                               569.3    10641.1      186.9
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8      521.7      116.5
    System Call Overhead                        114433.5  1218591.7      106.5
                                                                     =========
         FINAL SCORE                                                     130.9
      0 Not allowed!

  25. #50
    tektonic power VPS

    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 1588941.3 42.2
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 721.6 86.8
    Execl Throughput 188.3 699.8 37.2
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 8791.0 32.9
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 2865.0 26.6
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 95377.0 62.0
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 125551.5 11.2
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 34549.1 22.4
    Process Creation 569.3 1390.5 24.4
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 117.9 26.3
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 96803.4 8.5
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 28.5
    Web-HostUK
    Reliable Hosting At An Affordable Price.
      0 Not allowed!

Page 2 of 82 FirstFirst 123451252 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •