hosted by liquidweb


Go Back   Web Hosting Talk : Web Hosting Main Forums : Dedicated Server : How much is too much for server resources?
Reply

Dedicated Server Current and past experiences with dedicated server providers, bandwidth, and server performance. Review managed and unmanaged dedicated web servers, discuss both Windows and Unix dedicated server solutions, and discuss dedicated hosting providers. If your service is unavailable, please click here.
Forum Jump

How much is too much for server resources?

Reply Post New Thread In Dedicated Server Subscription
 
Send news tip View All Posts Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-31-2000, 02:19 PM
Rehan Rehan is offline
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 279
Hi, folks.

One more question before my foray into dedicated hosting:

How much memory/drive space should I get for the server?


I've narrowed the choice down to two of the Red Hat servers from catalog.com:
1) Celeron 500, 128MB RAM, 10 GB EIDE HD - $219 per month
and
2) Celeron 600, 256MB RAM, 20 GB EIDE HD - $259 per month

There will be a mix of web sites on the server -- about 20-30 small ones (hopefully growing to 50-100 or more), plus a few that have some fairly CPU-intensive scripts (nothing outrageous, though), and one site with 4-5 GB of realaudio/realvideo files that currently gets about 10 GB/month of traffic on its current server.


So... Would it be overkill to go with the server with more RAM and bigger HD? It's only $40/month more, and if I chose to upgrade later it would end up being $80/month more (forever, I guess?).


Thanks again.
Rehan

Reply With Quote


Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 10-31-2000, 03:39 PM
Chicken Chicken is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Southern California
Posts: 12,121
My vote is for #2, but it is easier to decide when it isn't my money

__________________
HostHideout.com - Where professionals discuss web hosting.

• Chicken

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-31-2000, 03:58 PM
alchiba alchiba is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,167
It's not my money either, but since you asked. . .
If you already have one site that would consume 50% of the drive on plan #1 and you're counting on many more sites to host, then I'd say go with #2. The additional memory is a big factor too.

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #4  
Old 10-31-2000, 04:04 PM
Rehan Rehan is offline
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 279
So 128 MB wouldn't be "enough"?

One of my sites is with phpwebhosting.com right now -- virtual hosting... (I think they're with DialtoneInternet.) The server I'm on has over 200 accounts, and 128 MB of memory; I don't know about the processor. I haven't had any CPU or memory related problems with my site there (although disk space and MySQL have been another story!).

128 MB seems to be good enough for 200 web sites, so would it not be okay for 100 sites plus a RealAudio download server?

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-31-2000, 04:18 PM
Chicken Chicken is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Southern California
Posts: 12,121
I'd think it would be fine for now, but just because one server has 128 and works fine, it doesn't relate to your server and what you'll be running on it. You can always get the cheaper one and upgrade as needed.

__________________
HostHideout.com - Where professionals discuss web hosting.

• Chicken

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-31-2000, 08:21 PM
JTY JTY is offline
Community Guide
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Washington, USA
Posts: 5,976
Cool

Vote for #2.

No such thing as too much ram.

__________________
John T. Yocum -- Fluid Hosting
Shared - VPS - Dedicated - Colocation

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-31-2000, 09:12 PM
BC BC is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: 80,000 feet under the sur
Posts: 2,736
Seconded. The more RAM the better it will run, and it's worth the extra $40/month.

__________________
My 2 Cents.... (or is that 2.2 cents inc. GST...?)

Have a think about this : Programming is like sex. Make a single little mistake, and you'll be supporting it for the rest of your life.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-31-2000, 09:15 PM
Rehan Rehan is offline
Web Hosting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 279
Thanks, guys.

I went with option #2...Not only for the RAM but also for the storage space. :-)

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-02-2000, 10:18 PM
cbaker17 cbaker17 is offline
Web Hosting Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Wichita, Ks, USA
Posts: 1,984
better idea

That was a better idea, its usually cheaper to lease a nicer system then to upgrade...

__________________
affordablecolo.com carrier grade colocation at a affordable price!
Charles Baker - Company Operations
1-866-316-HOST

Reply With Quote
Reply

Related posts from TheWhir.com
Title Type Date Posted
123-reg Launches New Cloud Server Range Web Hosting News 2013-04-19 13:01:21
VIDEO: CloudLinux CEO Igor Seletskiy on Hosting Platform Software Whir Tv 2012-11-09 09:36:01
Web Host CoolHandle Uses CloudLinux to Improve Server Performance Web Hosting News 2011-08-19 16:27:55
Web Host ServInt Upgrades VPS Resources, Adds New VPS Plan Web Hosting News 2011-07-19 14:05:32
Web Host Netcetera Launches Managed Windows Cloud Server Web Hosting News 2011-06-13 22:06:29


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Postbit Selector

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Login:
Log in with your username and password
Username:
Password:



Forgot Password?
Advertisement:
Web Hosting News:



 

X

Welcome to WebHostingTalk.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

WebHostingTalk.com is the largest, most influentual web hosting community on the Internet. Join us by filling in the form below.


(4 digit year)

Already a member?