
05-19-2004, 10:13 PM
|
|
WHT Addict
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 132
|
|
How to protect against DDoS flooding our uplink?
Is there anything we can do except waiting for upstream to cut our connections and block the aggressing IPs?
Hardware firewall doesn't work when the attack is targetted to saturate our uplink, please advice.
|

05-19-2004, 10:26 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London/Edinburgh
Posts: 1,132
|
|
Increase your upstream
Regards,
Thomas Currie
|

05-19-2004, 10:28 PM
|
|
WHT Addict
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 132
|
|
the problem is even if we buy 100Mbps of bandwidth, DC will still cut our connection when there is a DDoS.
|

05-19-2004, 10:29 PM
|
|
CISSP, CISA
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,046
|
|
Pretty much - You're going to want to find a provider with sufficient throughput to handle the attacks.
|

05-19-2004, 10:32 PM
|
|
WHT Addict
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 132
|
|
Change DC is not a good choice, it'll bring a huge downtime to us and our clients.
|

05-19-2004, 10:43 PM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 760
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nowisph
Change DC is not a good choice, it'll bring a huge downtime to us and our clients.
|
What you will want to do is stick an edge router (owned by you) on their end to prevent the DDOS from being able to saturate the line.
Example: If you have a router in their carrier building, you could in theory have it on a GIGE line to their core router, and then from your router it would go out over your pipe to your data center.

|

05-20-2004, 01:57 AM
|
|
CISSP, CISA
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,046
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by codywatkins
What you will want to do is stick an edge router (owned by you) on their end to prevent the DDOS from being able to saturate the line.
Example: If you have a router in their carrier building, you could in theory have it on a GIGE line to their core router, and then from your router it would go out over your pipe to your data center.
|
This will still saturate the line of the capacity is not present, not to mention that adding another device to the puzzle creates an additional potential point of failure and, more likely than not, performance issues (assuming that the device on the edge cannot perform at the same Mpps level).
Lets face it, most providers are not equipped to handle DDoS concerns, and trying to beat around the issue is a losing battle.
|

05-20-2004, 02:52 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 1,083
|
|
If you can live without specific IP addresses being globally reachable during attacks, I strongly recommend you work with your provider(s) on setting up a BGP black-hole mechanism. It is quite easy for your provider to do.
In addition, consider having your provider configure fixed filters to discard traffic that is typically associated with a DDoS event. For example, rate-limit non-tcp-established traffic to several mbits/sec. There are even more elegant solutions available to folks running Juniper routers.
Contact me if you have further questions.
|

05-20-2004, 03:49 AM
|
|
CISSP, CISA
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,046
|
|
jsw6:
My understanding has always been that non-established limiting was a terrible waste of resources.
Nonetheless, it definately seems as if you have some insight in these matters that I would be interested in speaking with you about. If you're up for a short discussion, please PM me your IM contact(s).
Thanks.
|

05-20-2004, 05:00 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,780
|
|
Juniper + Multi Gig uplinks!!
__________________
http://Ethr.net jay@ethr.net
West Coast AT&T / Level3 / Savvis Bandwidth, Colocation, Dedicated Server, Managed IP Service, Hardware Load Balancing Service, Transport Service, 365 Main St, SFO / 200 Paul Ave, SFO / PAIX, PAO / Market Post Tower, 55 S. Market, SJC / 11 Great Oaks, Equinix, SJC
|

05-20-2004, 05:23 AM
|
|
CISSP, CISA
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,046
|
|
His provider will not tolerate DDoS and he does not want to move -- so there's really not much we can do for him.
|

05-20-2004, 06:11 AM
|
|
WHT Addict
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 132
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by jsw6
If you can live without specific IP addresses being globally reachable during attacks, I strongly recommend you work with your provider(s) on setting up a BGP black-hole mechanism. It is quite easy for your provider to do.
|
Excuse me but what is the advantages of BGP black-hole? Is it a null-routing?
I afraid it will still cause us downtime? so how can we survive?
|

05-20-2004, 09:39 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 1,083
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nowisph
Excuse me but what is the advantages of BGP black-hole? Is it a null-routing?
I afraid it will still cause us downtime? so how can we survive?
|
It is null-routing. It will cause downtime for the IP addresses that you black-hole, but the attack will be filtered upstream and the rest of your services will operate normally.
Quote:
Originally posted by DeathNova
My understanding has always been that non-established limiting was a terrible waste of resources.
Nonetheless, it definately seems as if you have some insight in these matters that I would be interested in speaking with you about. If you're up for a short discussion, please PM me your IM contact(s).
|
If you've got the hardware resources for non-established rate-limiting, it is a big benefit to customers who are the target of DoS.
My AIM screen name is on my WHT profile.
|

05-20-2004, 09:41 AM
|
|
WHT Addict
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 132
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by jsw6
In addition, consider having your provider configure fixed filters to discard traffic that is typically associated with a DDoS event. For example, rate-limit non-tcp-established traffic to several mbits/sec.
|
I think it shouldn't work, DDoS now use real IPs instead of spoofed IPs and each one don't use more than 20 times in 3 mins. Every connection is established, it's even very hard to block at our hardware firewall.
|

05-20-2004, 09:48 AM
|
|
Web Hosting Master
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 1,083
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nowisph
I think it shouldn't work, DDoS now don't use spoofed IPs, but real IPs and each one don't use more than 20 times in 3 mins.
|
The source address is not a factor. You or your provider will simply discard all traffic destined for one or more IP addresses which are under attack.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
| Postbit Selector |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Login: |
|
|
| Advertisement: |
|
|
| Web Hosting News: |
|
|
|